Mark Radabaugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously you can't keep leaving big 'reserved' holes in your
allocations to downstreams for potential growth.
I've seen RIPE allocate /20s under the proviso that the customer use
the first /23 now and apply to use the rest of the space as they grow.
--
the large quantity of /24 announcements is, I suspect, from comapnies just
large enough to want the benefits of multihoming. You know, 2 t1s on a
small router, and stuff like that..
Bri
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
I've a feeling that the fact that everyone shares
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 03:35:19PM -0700, Brian wrote:
the large quantity of /24 announcements is, I suspect, from comapnies just
large enough to want the benefits of multihoming. You know, 2 t1s on a
small router, and stuff like that..
Everyone and their mother says they suspect that,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
If someone has done an actual study of where these /24s (and probably /23s
too) come from, please point it out. Until then, my money is on clueless
redist connected/statics, large cable/dsl providers who announce a /24 per
Until then, my money is
on clueless
redist connected/statics, large cable/dsl providers who
announce a /24 per
pop/city/whatever to their single transit provider, and
general ignorance.
Why attribute to functionality what can easily be explained by
incomptence. :)
--
Richard A
Now the question is, of that 70% figure, how much of that is
aggregateable?
--Phil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Paul Schultz
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 10:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: routing table size
On Mon, 29
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
If the size of the global routing table is really an important issue, why
not start filtering /24 announcements?
By all means, go ahead. You don't need anyone's permission. Report back with
your results.
I have more of a legal right to use my
Off your network, your legal rights are pretty limited. I (and I'm sure
lots of other admins) block at the /24 boundry. Anything you announce
from /25 to /32 will be ignored on my network. Some providers choose to
block according to RIR allocation sizes. To me, that's not worth the
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002 23:04:02 +0100 (BST), Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
I've a feeling that the fact that everyone shares at least the view that a
/24
is minimum helps to contain the routing table. (even if there are still
thousands of /24 announcements)
If a significant number of providers
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, David Schwartz wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002 23:04:02 +0100 (BST), Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
I've a feeling that the fact that everyone shares at least the view that a
/24
is minimum helps to contain the routing table. (even if there are still
thousands of /24
10 matches
Mail list logo
