I'm willing to reply on-list, but obviously any business or legal
contacts have to be off-list. For those, I can point you to the
product manager for the technology, but it would frankly be better
for one to go through one's account team, for scaling reasons.
Yes, the vendors are aware
On 6/20/2006 1:33 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
Yes, the vendors are aware of this. Our legal people track it pretty
closely, and we have been dealing with the issues in Europe,
Australia, and a number of other places for quite a while. We talk
directly with legislators, regulators, and
On 6/20/2006 2:57 PM, Hoffpauir, Dusty wrote:
The FCC/FBI have left it up the industry to define a standard, they are
not defining it themselves.
Right. But they do have veto power, and they do not appear to have given
approval yet. Meanwhile the deadline continues to close. This is an
USTelecom has put on a free webinar about this, with guests from VeriSign.
It might be on interest.
http://www.ustelecom.org/events.php?urh=home.events.web2006_0615
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
A. Hall
Sent: Tuesday, June
On Jun 20, 2006, at 11:44 AM, Eric A. Hall wrote:
This is interesting approach. For one, it seems to cover a lot more
technology than CALEA requires. I suppose that is an artifact of
trying to
serve multiple countries' requiresments in a single architecture.
Actually, no.
IANAL
US laws
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Frank Bulk
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:14 PM
To: nanog list
Subject: RE: voip calea interfaces
USTelecom has put on a free webinar about this, with guests from VeriSign.
It might be on interest.
http://www.ustelecom.org
