Paul wrote:
this part, on the other hand...
he's put
*.*.*.* in, he's asking people not to use it anymore.
...mystifies me. anyone who has read rfc1034 or rfc1035, even
if they did not also read rfc2181 or rfc2136 or rfc2308, knows
that in a
returning 127.0.0.2 for everything would be an ugly way to bow out.
yes, but it's been done before.
Someone has been in contact with Joe via phone and posted
to another mailing list That Zhall Not Be Named that
exactly that is happening. The zone is dead, he's put
*.*.*.* in, he's asking
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 20:59:22 -0400 (EDT) Mark Jeftovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Returning 127.0.0.2 on everything would indeed be an ugly way to bow
out, but its been done before. Another RBL went out the same way
previously, can't remember which one (was it orbz?)
it was more complicated
ok so this part does not mystify me...
Someone has been in contact with Joe via phone and posted
to another mailing list That Zhall Not Be Named that
exactly that is happening. The zone is dead, ...
...because running blackhole lists is surprisingly more hard
than most people think.
--On Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:53 AM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mail was delayed (and servers put under heavy load waiting for DNS
queries to time out) when MAPS finally shut off free access
without warning (a week or more after they originally had warned
they'd do it, but gave
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:36:54 -0400 Nathan J. Mehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the immortal words of Richard Welty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Gary E. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
returning 127.0.0.2 for everything would be an ugly way to bow out.
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Gary E. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
returning 127.0.0.2 for everything would be an ugly way to bow out.
yes, but it's been done before.
I am just seeing timeouts for XXX.relays.osirusoft.com now.
there has been a heavy DOS in progress against a
