On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 05:17:17 -, Paul Vixie said:
i suspect it's not the number of RR's or even the obscurity of those RR's,
but rather the fact that the RR's keep changing in number, kind, and name,
Well, That RR looked totally different last month certainly qualifies said RR
as weird ;)
Edward,
DAU I don't think SPF is worthless [1] but it isn't a drop-in
DAU solution and the impact on infrastructure will be
DAU significant if it becomes widely adopted.
EBD When an architecture is maxed out, it's difficult to make
EBD significant improvents that are drop-in.
On the theory
DC Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:08:12 -0700
DC From: Dave Crocker
DC DAU I don't think SPF is worthless [1] but it isn't a drop-in
DC DAU solution and the impact on infrastructure will be
DC DAU significant if it becomes widely adopted.
DC EBD When an architecture is maxed out, it's difficult to
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 04:00:56 -, Edward B. Dreger said:
Without new code/libs to parse the TXT RR, SPF doesn't work. As
long as new code is being written, it seems logical to have
another RRTYPE assigned -- that's one less thing to change later.
On the other hand, having to deploy a new
Without new code/libs to parse the TXT RR, SPF doesn't work. ...
that could be one of the reasons why, two years before the advent of SPF,
i wrote up and circulated jim miller's idea from 1998. if you want to
know about the paths not taken, see http://sa.vix.com/~vixie/mailfrom.txt.
On the
DAU Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 14:46:02 -0700
DAU From: David A. Ulevitch
DAU I don't think SPF is worthless [1] but it isn't a drop-in
DAU solution and the impact on infrastructure will be
DAU significant if it becomes widely adopted.
When an architecture is maxed out, it's difficult to make
On Aug 4, 2004, at 3:23 PM, Edward B. Dreger wrote:
DAU I think people will realize that if we're remodeling the
DAU boat that much we should have at least made sure we were
DAU fixing something in the process...
Indeed.
[snip]
Running something DNS-based that requires simple parsing is
hardly an
DAU Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 15:46:17 -0700
DAU From: David A. Ulevitch
DAU SPF's use of TXT records doesn't bother me so much. It's
Perhaps some other technology would like to use TXT RRs. If
something hogs an entire RRTYPE at a given scope, it really
should have its own RRTYPE. An acceptable
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, David A.Ulevitch wrote:
SPF's use of TXT records doesn't bother me so much. It's more that
people are (blindly) clamoring for it.
Maybe you should -- draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy
Edward B. Dreger wrote:
DAU Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 15:46:17 -0700
DAU From: David A. Ulevitch
DAU SPF's use of TXT records doesn't bother me so much. It's
Perhaps some other technology would like to use TXT RRs. If
something hogs an entire RRTYPE at a given scope, it really
should have its own
10 matches
Mail list logo
