On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Brandon Galbraith wrote:
True :) I'd also think (read: hope) if an organization was located in an
area where multi-homing was not possible, then that organization and its
customers would not be doing things that are mission critical, i.e.
business stops if there is no
Almost ALL providers should be multihomed.
--Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
virendra rode //
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:26 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)
-BEGIN PGP
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
virendra rode //
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:26 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frank Bulk wrote:
http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn
: Friday, March 16, 2007 6:56 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)
Almost ALL?
Any company, or any person for that matter, that relies on their
Internet connectivity for their lively hood should be multihomed.
-wil
On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:42 PM
On 16-Mar-2007, at 19:56, Wil Schultz wrote:
Almost ALL?
Surely all those except those who are competing with you for the same
customers should multi-home. :-)
Joe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 16, 2007, at 6:59 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Some locations are just too cost prohibitive to multihome, but that
really
is a select few.
It isn't just cost but can be path diversity (or lack thereof). We
used to be headquartered 210
, as a business requirement.
Frank
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 8:54 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)
Almost ALL?
Any company, or any person for that matter, that relies on their
Internet connectivity for their lively
Joe Abley wrote:
On 16-Mar-2007, at 19:56, Wil Schultz wrote:
Almost ALL?
Surely all those except those who are competing with you for the same
customers should multi-home. :-)
To the NANOG T-shirt Committee: Please consider this as the slogan for the
next design.
On 3/16/07, Justin M. Streiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Joe Abley wrote:
Almost ALL?
Surely all those except those who are competing with you for the same
customers should multi-home. :-)
True :) I'd also think (read: hope) if an organization was located in an
area
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frank Bulk wrote:
http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/articlePrint.cfm?id=1310151
Is this a normal thing for Level 3 to do, cut off small, responsive
providers?
Frank
-
Just curious, should small responsive providers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
virendra rode // wrote:
Frank Bulk wrote:
http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/articlePrint.cfm?id=1310151
Is this a normal thing for Level 3 to do, cut off small, responsive
providers?
Frank
Just curious, should small
my 2 cents)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Frank Bulk
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 10:30 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)
http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/articlePrint.cfm?id
Not knowing anything about the case other than what I read in the
article, my hang up is that a transit provider can make a phone call
and destroy a customer's business with 30 minutes notice. On a DS3
that has actual real lead time to replace, that's a business killer.
The argument of
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Frank Bulk wrote:
http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/articlePrint.cfm?id=1310151
Is this a normal thing for Level 3 to do, cut off small, responsive
providers?
Even from that one-sided account, I have serious problems with:
Siwert said the Colorado-based Level 3 cited
On Mar 15, 2007, at 8:25 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Frank Bulk wrote:
http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/articlePrint.cfm?id=1310151
Is this a normal thing for Level 3 to do, cut off small, responsive
providers?
Even from that one-sided account, I have serious problems with:
http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/articlePrint.cfm?id=1310151
Is this a normal thing for Level 3 to do, cut off small, responsive
providers?
Frank
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Frank Bulk wrote:
http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/articlePrint.cfm?id=1310151
Is this a normal thing for Level 3 to do, cut off small, responsive
providers?
I heard from a few folks working for TelCove that they were under order to
do whatever it took to disconnect
On 3/14/07, david raistrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I heard from a few folks working for TelCove that they were under order to
do whatever it took to disconnect customers under certian levels in my
local area (not philly).
Related? Dunno.
Level3 recently stiffed us on a colo contract
18 matches
Mail list logo
