/resilience/
- Original Message -
From: Sean Donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, November 18, 2002 0:55 am
Subject: Re: Simulated disaster exercise? Re: PAIX
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
The usual response was it only affected the public exchange
fabric
In the 1990's the MAEs and Gigaswitches would give us an unscheduled
failure of a major exchange point on a regular basis, which let us
demostrate our disaster recovery capabilities. With the improved
reliability, i.e. the PAIXes haven't had a catastrophic failure, we
haven't had as many
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:10:43AM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 10:00:07PM -0500, Sean Donelan wrote:
The usual response was it only affected the public exchange fabric, not
any private point-to-point circuits between providers through the same
facility.
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 08:45:07PM -0500, Sean Donelan wrote:
In the 1990's the MAEs and Gigaswitches would give us an unscheduled
failure of a major exchange point on a regular basis, which let us
demostrate our disaster recovery capabilities. With the improved
reliability, i.e. the PAIXes
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
The usual response was it only affected the public exchange fabric, not
any private point-to-point circuits between providers through the same
facility.
But if we're going to compare this to MAE Gigaswitch failures, shouldn't
we be
In the 1990's the MAEs and Gigaswitches would give us an unscheduled
failure of a major exchange point on a regular basis, which let us
demostrate our disaster recovery capabilities. With the improved
reliability, i.e. the PAIXes haven't had a catastrophic failure, we
haven't had as many
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Sean Donelan wrote:
In the 1990's the MAEs and Gigaswitches would give us an unscheduled
failure of a major exchange point on a regular basis, which let us
demostrate our disaster recovery capabilities. With the improved
reliability, i.e. the PAIXes haven't had a
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 08:45:07PM -0500, Sean Donelan wrote:
With the improved reliability, i.e. the PAIXes haven't had a
catastrophic failure, we haven't had as many opportunities to
demonstrate how well we can handle a disaster at those locations.
July 31st 2002, this list:
2121 Jul
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
July 31st 2002, this list:
2121 Jul 31 Herb Leong ( 4) Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump?
How quickly we forget. :)
The usual response was it only affected the public exchange fabric, not
any private point-to-point circuits
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 10:00:07PM -0500, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
July 31st 2002, this list:
2121 Jul 31 Herb Leong ( 4) Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump?
How quickly we forget. :)
The usual response was it only affected
10 matches
Mail list logo
