Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards)

2003-09-23 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) Hello Paul , Am I correct in the understanding that the below tells me that 9.2.2p2 does NOT contain the ablility to do root-delegation-only ? Tia , JimL

Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards)

2003-09-23 Thread Paul Vixie
Hello Paul , All , Is there a url listing the TLD's that officially use wild cards in their deployment ? nope. right now you just have to know. we're trying to keep a list of places that either use wildcards and have been accepted by the community, or don't use wildcards but run

bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards)

2003-09-20 Thread Paul Vixie
if you installed the first isc wildcard patch you probably want the second. see www.isc.org/products/BIND/delegation-only.html for details. the first patch didn't handle NS lookups (which don't occur in nature but it's sort of unnerving when they don't work in dig). in addition to the type

Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards)

2003-09-20 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello Paul , Am I correct in the understanding that the below tells me that 9.2.2p2 does NOT contain the ablility to do root-delegation-only ? Tia , JimL On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Paul Vixie wrote: if you installed the first isc wildcard patch you probably want the second.

Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards)

2003-09-20 Thread Paul Vixie
-0400 (EDT) From: Mr. James W. Laferriere [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Paul Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards) Hello Paul , Am I correct in the understanding that the below tells me that 9.2.2p2 does NOT contain the ablility to do