In the referenced message, Roy said:
Registering is not bad, its just not beneficial. Given that the routes I want
to announce are within my assigned range, why is it a good thing to register
them? If the transit provider always add entries when I ask for them, it seems
to be very little
## On 2002-04-12 17:27 -0700 Mark Kent typed:
MK
MK To address Sean's point about mistakes turning one /16 into a zillion
MK entries, is there any way to allow only some specified maximum number
MK of routes from a bgp neighbor? I know that I'ld be happy if my
MK upstreams gave me a buffer
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 04:53:38PM +0100, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
Genuity - first class provider, I would recommend them
What transit provider doesnt use prefixes? Do you think they're mad
enough to accept anything you send them?
And yes, they update the filter within minutes of you
Two bad experiences for me:
1) Their BGP polices are not as good as others. They force you to register
each route you want to advertise rather than allowing you to advertise any
reasonable route for your prefixes. According to one of their top people,
prefix-lists were unreliable new
on
their circut due to an issue on their end.
-Eric
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, matthew zeier wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:16:57 -0700
From: matthew zeier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: genuity - any good?
I've gotten attractive pricing from Genuity but I haven't used
Quick correct, they are extended access-lists
-Original Message-
From: Kris Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:02 AM
To: 'Roy'; matthew zeier; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: genuity - any good?
reasonable route for your prefixes. According
'; matthew zeier; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: genuity - any good?
reasonable route for your prefixes. According to one of
their top people,
prefix-lists were unreliable new technology. We gave up and
canceled the
circuit.
Genuity does use prefix lists (at least
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 04:16:57PM -0700, matthew zeier wrote:
I've gotten attractive pricing from Genuity but I haven't used them in a
couple years. Is there any reason I wouldn't want to use them as a third
upstream OC3 provider?
Genuity has a slightly backwards philosophy on delivering
On 2002-04-11-19:16:57, matthew zeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've gotten attractive pricing from Genuity but I haven't used them
in a couple years. Is there any reason I wouldn't want to use them
as a third upstream OC3 provider?
From a customer service prospective, Genuity is excellent.
.
chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: genuity - any good?
1) Their BGP polices are not as good as others. They force you to
register
Pricing is a bit on the high side compared to other providers in their
league, at least when I've had things quoted out recently. If you're
looking for quality over quantity, I'd have no qualms recommending
them.
I found that quite the opposite. I was amazed that they matched my Internap
, Christian
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:31 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: genuity - any good?
I think the argument is not about route filtering - it is the
implementation
method.
Genuity uses ip extended access-lists
MAY be
announced from their customers, which I suppose has its merits.
chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: genuity - any good
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Roy wrote:
1) Their BGP polices are not as good as others. They force you to register
each route you want to advertise rather than allowing you to advertise any
reasonable route for your prefixes.
One of our upstreams wanted this so we just ended up sending them every
In the referenced message, Roy said:
Two bad experiences for me:
1) Their BGP polices are not as good as others. They force you to register
each route you want to advertise rather than allowing you to advertise any
reasonable route for your prefixes. According to one of their top
Registering is not bad, its just not beneficial. Given that the routes I want
to announce are within my assigned range, why is it a good thing to register
them? If the transit provider always add entries when I ask for them, it seems
to be very little benefit..
This is the case of transit so
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 04:50:20PM -0700, Roy wrote:
Registering is not bad, its just not beneficial. Given that the routes I want
to announce are within my assigned range, why is it a good thing to register
them? If the transit provider always add entries when I ask for them, it seems
to
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Roy wrote:
Registering is not bad, its just not beneficial. Given that the routes I want
to announce are within my assigned range, why is it a good thing to register
them? If the transit provider always add entries when I ask for them, it seems
to be very little
I've gotten attractive pricing from Genuity but I haven't used them
in a couple years. Is there any reason I wouldn't want to use them
as a third upstream OC3 provider?
I think they are outstanding. After using a bunch-o'nsps from 1994 to
1998, including 5 at a time, we picked Genuity when
19 matches
Mail list logo
