Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-22 Thread W. Mark Townsley
Enke Chen wrote: Hi, Mark: I was no vacation and just became aware of this thread. Lucky you! I have some clarifications here: (1) The relevant implementation is Encapsulating MPLS in IP or Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) for L3VPN (draft-ietf-mpls-in-ip-or-gre-xx.txt) This draft

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-22 Thread Enke Chen
: iMPLS benefit References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Enke Chen wrote: Hi, Mark: I was no vacation and just became aware of this thread. Lucky you! I have some clarifications here: (1) The relevant implementation is Encapsulating MPLS in IP or Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-15 Thread Yakov Rekhter
Mark, i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) service without needing to run label switching in the core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS). ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-townsley-l2tpv3-mpls-01.txt See also Mark's talk from the last NANOG

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-15 Thread W. Mark Townsley
Please see inline. Yakov Rekhter wrote: Mark, i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) service without needing to run label switching in the core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS). ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-townsley-l2tpv3-mpls-01.txt See also Mark's

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-15 Thread Yakov Rekhter
Mark, Please see inline. in-line... i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) service without needing to run label switching in the core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS). ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-townsley-l2tpv3-mpls-0 1.txt See

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-15 Thread W. Mark Townsley
Yakov Rekhter wrote: No, I was *not* referring to draft-raggarwa-ppvpn-tunnel-encap-sig-03.txt. Redback's implementation that does not require manual provisioning of point-to-point GRE tunnels between MPLS networks and to each and every IP-only reachable PE is *purely* an implementation

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-15 Thread Yakov Rekhter
Mark, [clipped...] Enabling MPLS over any type of IP tunnel changes the security characteristi cs of your 2547 deployment, in particular with respect to packet spoofing attacks. The L2TPv3 encapsulation used with the extension defined above provides anti-spoofing protection for blind

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-06 Thread W. Mark Townsley
David Meyer wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:02:10AM -0800, Yakov Rekhter wrote: Dave, Hey Suki, On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote: Hello, i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) service without needing to run label switching in the

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-05 Thread Yakov Rekhter
Dave, Hey Suki, On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote: Hello, i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) service without needing to run label switching in the core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS).

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-05 Thread David Meyer
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:02:10AM -0800, Yakov Rekhter wrote: Dave, Hey Suki, On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote: Hello, i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) service without needing to run label switching in the

iMPLS benefit

2004-03-04 Thread sonet twister
Hello, i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) service without needing to run label switching in the core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) butstraight IP (aka iMPLS). Anyone runningthis in a live network yet? Thanks in advance for any information. Suki Lim Blacksburg, VA ee.VA.TECH Do you Yahoo!?

Re: iMPLS benefit

2004-03-04 Thread David Meyer
Hey Suki, On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote: Hello, i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) service without needing to run label switching in the core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS).