Enke Chen wrote:
Hi, Mark:
I was no vacation and just became aware of this thread.
Lucky you!
I have some clarifications here:
(1) The relevant implementation is Encapsulating MPLS in IP or Generic
Routing Encapsulation (GRE) for L3VPN (draft-ietf-mpls-in-ip-or-gre-xx.txt)
This draft
: iMPLS benefit
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enke Chen wrote:
Hi, Mark:
I was no vacation and just became aware of this thread.
Lucky you!
I have some clarifications here:
(1) The relevant implementation is Encapsulating MPLS in IP or Generic
Routing Encapsulation (GRE
Mark,
i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
service without needing to run label switching in the
core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS).
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-townsley-l2tpv3-mpls-01.txt
See also Mark's talk from the last NANOG
Please see inline.
Yakov Rekhter wrote:
Mark,
i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
service without needing to run label switching in the
core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS).
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-townsley-l2tpv3-mpls-01.txt
See also Mark's
Mark,
Please see inline.
in-line...
i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
service without needing to run label switching in the
core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS).
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-townsley-l2tpv3-mpls-0
1.txt
See
Yakov Rekhter wrote:
No, I was *not* referring to draft-raggarwa-ppvpn-tunnel-encap-sig-03.txt.
Redback's implementation that does not require manual provisioning of
point-to-point GRE tunnels between MPLS networks and to each and every
IP-only reachable PE is *purely* an implementation
Mark,
[clipped...]
Enabling MPLS over any type of IP tunnel changes the security characteristi
cs
of your 2547 deployment, in particular with respect to packet spoofing
attacks. The L2TPv3 encapsulation used with the extension defined above
provides anti-spoofing protection for blind
David Meyer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:02:10AM -0800, Yakov Rekhter wrote:
Dave,
Hey Suki,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote:
Hello,
i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
service without needing to run label switching in the
Dave,
Hey Suki,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote:
Hello,
i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
service without needing to run label switching in the
core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS).
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:02:10AM -0800, Yakov Rekhter wrote:
Dave,
Hey Suki,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote:
Hello,
i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
service without needing to run label switching in the
Hello,
i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547) service without needing to run label switching in the core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) butstraight IP (aka iMPLS). Anyone runningthis in a live network yet? Thanks in advance for any information.
Suki Lim
Blacksburg, VA
ee.VA.TECH
Do you Yahoo!?
Hey Suki,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote:
Hello,
i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
service without needing to run label switching in the
core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS).
12 matches
Mail list logo