On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
I wouldn't recommend this. If you have two DNS servers on different
addresses, everyone can talk to #2 if #1 doesn't answer.
I noticed that many Windoze mail servers don't bother to check the second
server if the primary's dead.
--vadim
Paul wrote:
this part, on the other hand...
he's put
*.*.*.* in, he's asking people not to use it anymore.
...mystifies me. anyone who has read rfc1034 or rfc1035, even
if they did not also read rfc2181 or rfc2136 or rfc2308, knows
that in a
Hello
; DiG 9.2.0 relays.osirusoft.com txt
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 39308
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;relays.osirusoft.com. IN TXT
;; ANSWER SECTION
returning 127.0.0.2 for everything would be an ugly way to bow out.
yes, but it's been done before.
Someone has been in contact with Joe via phone and posted
to another mailing list That Zhall Not Be Named that
exactly that is happening. The zone is dead, he's put
*.*.*.* in, he's asking
George William Herbert wrote:
Yes, this is due to a massive DDOS. At least three
of the spamfilter BLs have been so attacked this week.
Some of the networks represented here have not been
as timely about helping the BL providers with the
DDOSes as they could be. Please keep in mind that
without
On 8/26/03 4:45 PM, Matthew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
George William Herbert wrote:
Yes, this is due to a massive DDOS. At least three
of the spamfilter BLs have been so attacked this week.
Some of the networks represented here have not been
as timely about helping the BL
although this has to do with spam, i think folks will agree that there's
operational content here:
relays.osirusoft.com is down, it's history, stop using it.
it is currently returning 127.0.0.2 for everything, so if you're using it,
you won't receive this, but at least those who don't use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Richard Welty wrote:
relays.osirusoft.com is down, it's history, stop using it.
it is currently returning 127.0.0.2 for everything, so if you're using it,
you won't receive this, but at least those who
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 20:59:22 -0400 (EDT) Mark Jeftovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Returning 127.0.0.2 on everything would indeed be an ugly way to bow
out, but its been done before. Another RBL went out the same way
previously, can't remember which one (was it orbz?)
it was more complicated
ok so this part does not mystify me...
Someone has been in contact with Joe via phone and posted
to another mailing list That Zhall Not Be Named that
exactly that is happening. The zone is dead, ...
...because running blackhole lists is surprisingly more hard
than most people think.
On woensdag, aug 27, 2003, at 13:54 Europe/Amsterdam, Matthew Sullivan
wrote:
Someone has suggested 'anycasting' what do people (particually you
Paul)
think of using anycasting for a DNSbl? (- AS112 anyone?) I think it
may
work well... however I am a novice in terms of BGP... As far as I can
--On Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:53 AM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mail was delayed (and servers put under heavy load waiting for DNS
queries to time out) when MAPS finally shut off free access
without warning (a week or more after they originally had warned
they'd do it, but gave
Someone has suggested 'anycasting' what do people (particually you
Paul) think of using anycasting for a DNSbl? (- AS112 anyone?)
unowned anycast, such as that used in as112, is only possible when the
replies have no value (and thus need not be synchronized or centrally
authorized.)
In the immortal words of Richard Welty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Gary E. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
returning 127.0.0.2 for everything would be an ugly way to bow out.
yes, but it's been done before.
And oddly enough, it was a terrible idea the
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:36:54 -0400 Nathan J. Mehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the immortal words of Richard Welty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Gary E. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
returning 127.0.0.2 for everything would be an ugly way to bow out.
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Gary E. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
returning 127.0.0.2 for everything would be an ugly way to bow out.
yes, but it's been done before.
I am just seeing timeouts for XXX.relays.osirusoft.com now.
there has been a heavy DOS in progress against a
]: [ID 866145 daemon.info] lame server resolving
'130.38.76.211.relays.osirusoft.com' (in 'relays.osirusoft.COM'?): 127.0.0.1#53
(That's PDT), and in my cache I see,
$ dig relays.osirusoft.com ns
; DiG 9.2.2 relays.osirusoft.com ns
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer
17 matches
Mail list logo
