This is quite something. From Judge Lamberth's order, additional
insight into the behavior of a contractor we know well:
It is unfortunate, therefore, that Interior proposes that
[e]ach bureau or office for which reconnection is intended
will take steps to verify its representation that
Mike Lewinski [3/16/2004 8:17 AM] :
I know that CW was supposed to close their US ops, and then it went to
re-org and became CW America or something of the sort, but does anyone
here have a clue as to their new support info? Because just a week or so
ago 800-486-9932 got me to a real human
ok, power is back on.
There's a big stinky charred mess in the street, but nothing too horrible.
This is in San Francisco for those of you that missed that heh.
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote:
Apparently there's some PGE problem, and a possible electrical fire. It
appears that
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote:
Certianly the point central to your arguement is that with the right
abuse-desk to customer ratio AND the right customer base, things could be
kept clean for smtp/web/ftp/blah 'hosting'.
I'll take the right customer
Can anyone suggest a good replacement for an
Extreme Black Diamond 6808 switch, we use it for aggregation, however their
support is abhorrant and every time we have an issue they require us to
unconfigure the switch, reset it to defaults and manually reconfigure it, no
matter what the
Burton, Chris wrote:
I spoke with their NOC about 3 days ago @800.663.9932.
Thanks to everyone for the fast responses... we did finally find a
functional number (the above had a recording to call 800-486- which
got the goods).
Mike
Rick Adams and Mike O'Dell had an idea in 1987.
How is this any different?
actually rick had the idea by himself in 1987. mike came a bit later.
Their idea, if I got it right, was 'ip everywhere'.
in that most other companies still thought ISO/OSI was going to be the
commercial protocol
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And then there's the newer high-density rackmount units like
http://www.rlx.com/products/serverblades/dense.php. This product puts
up to 24 server blades in a 3U chassis which basically means you can put
8 times as many servers in a rack.
sadly, the blade vendors
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, John Kristoff wrote:
There are certain environments where it would be nice for people to have
spent some time. Working at a university would be one good experience for
many people, particularly in this field, to have had.
I fully agree...This is the one environment
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andrew Dorsett
Sent: March 15, 2004 11:17 PM
To: John Kristoff
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo?
I'm not referring to the time required to implement. I'm
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Vivien M. wrote:
You must be talking about a different Netreg system that the one everyone
else has used. The one we're talking about involves you logging in when you
connect with an unknown MAC - once you've used the system to match your MAC
to your student
Please see inline.
Yakov Rekhter wrote:
Mark,
i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
service without needing to run label switching in the
core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS).
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-townsley-l2tpv3-mpls-01.txt
See also Mark's
Mark,
Please see inline.
in-line...
i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
service without needing to run label switching in the
core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS).
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-townsley-l2tpv3-mpls-0
1.txt
See
Yakov Rekhter wrote:
No, I was *not* referring to draft-raggarwa-ppvpn-tunnel-encap-sig-03.txt.
Redback's implementation that does not require manual provisioning of
point-to-point GRE tunnels between MPLS networks and to each and every
IP-only reachable PE is *purely* an implementation
Mark,
[clipped...]
Enabling MPLS over any type of IP tunnel changes the security characteristi
cs
of your 2547 deployment, in particular with respect to packet spoofing
attacks. The L2TPv3 encapsulation used with the extension defined above
provides anti-spoofing protection for blind
101 - 115 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
