> On May 18, 2024, at 11:55, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2024 at 10:38, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>> So, yes, I think having an open peering policy should be a requirement for
>> operating a root nameserver. I don’t think there’s any defensible rationale
>>
> On May 18, 2024, at 19:30, Ray Bellis wrote:
> According to their PeeringDB entry, at all of the 23 IXPs listed they only
> peer via route servers and not bilaterally.
> As such I don't think it's entirely fair to call them out on this.
I’m not “calling them out,” I’m merely repeating
> On May 18, 2024, at 08:56, Saku Ytti wrote:
> What are we asking in terms of your proposed policy change of allowing
> host a root DNS? You must peer with everyone and anyone, at any terms?
Well, putting aside Cogent per se, and focusing on this much more interesting
issue, I would suggest
> On Fri, May 17, 2024, 6:05 PM William Herrin wrote:
> For those who haven't been around long enough, this isn't Cogent's
> first depeering argument. Nor their second.
They’re also still in the middle of one with NTT.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogent_Communications#Peering_disputes
> On May 18, 2024, at 02:30, William Herrin wrote:
> So Cogent operates a root server because they bought PSI who ran a
> root server and ICANN has never chosen to throw down the gauntlet.
As John said, ICANN has nothing to do with who runs root servers. Last I knew,
NTIA still believed
> On May 18, 2024, at 03:53, John R. Levine wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2024, William Herrin wrote:
>> That said, ICANN generates the root zone including the servers
>> declared authoritative for the zone.
> Nope.
>
>> So they do have an ability to
>> say: nope, you've crossed the line to any of the
> On Apr 6, 2024, at 10:30, Ray Bellis wrote:
> On 27/02/2024 18:47, William Herrin wrote:
>> Then I'd write a script to monitor the local tftp server and stop frr if it
>> detects any problems with the tftp server.
> There are other ways to achieve this without actually stopping the routing
https://pleroma.pch.net/media/59934e723985a9d0eb476eda11ca090f602091190d11d181c5d0dd7523755768.png
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
> On Feb 27, 2024, at 08:54, Dave Taht wrote:
> One of the things I learned today was that starlink has published an
> extensive guide as to how existing BGP AS holders can peer with them to get
> better service.
Yes, essentially every AS does this. The ones that follow best-practices tend
> On Feb 27, 2024, at 08:54, Dave Taht wrote:
> One of the things I learned today was that starlink has published an
> extensive guide as to how existing BGP AS holders can peer with them to get
> better service.
Yes, essentially every AS does this. The ones that follow best-practices tend
The system Ask is describing is the traditional method of using anycast to
geographically load-balance long-lived flows. The first time I did that was
with FTP servers in Berkeley and Santa Cruz, in 1989.
I did a bigger system, also load balancing FTP servers for Oracle, their
public-facing
>>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 8:11 AM Bill Woodcock wrote:
>>> Not exactly down… they just busted their DNSSEC, or their domain got
>>> hijacked or something. Bad DNSKEY records.
>>
>> On Jan 31, 2024, at 06:34, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>> Not ne
> On Jan 30, 2024, at 17:00, Dmitry Sherman wrote:
>
> ru tld down?
Not exactly down… they just busted their DNSSEC, or their domain got hijacked
or something. Bad DNSKEY records.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
I just checked with NASA DNS ops, and they said that it was a DNSSEC issue with
the delegation from .GOV, which has since been resolved.
-Bill
> On Dec 22, 2023, at 15:43, Leato, Gary via NANOG wrote:
>
> Are there any admins on list from nasa? Looks like
Got it, thank you.
> On Dec 19, 2023, at 15:57, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> p { margin: 0; }
> I responded offlist.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> Midwest-IX
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
> F
> On Dec 19, 2023, at 15:22, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Has something happened at PCH to reduce their responsiveness? They used to be
> really good, but it's been tough hearing back from them this year.
Offhand, I’m not able to see any tickets with your name on them… Can you give
me a specific
Exactly. Speed x distance = cost. This is _exactly_ why IXPs get set up. To
avoid backhauling bandwidth from Dallas, or wherever. Loss, latency,
out-of-order delivery, and jitter. All lower when you source your bandwidth
closer.
-Bill
> On Oct 15, 2023,
> On Oct 15, 2023, at 01:01, Dave Taht wrote:
> I am under the impression that many IXPs remain very successful,
I know of 760 active IXPs, out of 1,148 total, so, over 31 years, two-thirds
are still successful now. Obviously they didn’t all start 31 years ago, they
started on a
> On Aug 22, 2023, at 10:39, Thomas Beer wrote:
> to make an (intermediate) summary so far, it's 2023 and there are no tools
> available
> for BGP, ASN and IX interconnection visualization static or dynamic?!
No, that is not at all correct. People have tools that solve their actual
needs. Do
The ASN really isn’t a big deal. There’s no scarcity of them, you can get a
16-bit one by asking.
The legacy IPv4 space, well, if there’s a clear chain of custody to the current
holder, and the current holder is responsive, they can use it or transfer it.
But also, IPv4 space isn’t scarce…
> On Apr 21, 2023, at 11:38 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account)
> wrote:
> What's the current thinking around reverse DNS on IPs used by typical
> residential/ small business customers?
> I'm not talking about reverse dns for infrastructure/router IPs here, as I
> still feel those need to
> On Apr 4, 2023, at 5:39 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> Can someone who is familiar with the fiber assets around the union square
> area in SF ping me off-list?
Heh. Somewhere, I have photos that Steve Feldman and I took while spelunking
around under there trying to find fiber for the NANOG that
Forwarded to the maintainers.
-Bill
> On Feb 4, 2023, at 6:44 PM, David Bass wrote:
>
> Anyone on here run it? The URL to sign up on the website doesn’t seem to
> work at the moment.
> On Oct 14, 2022, at 12:40 AM, George Toma wrote:
> Does anybody know if it possible to create ARIN ORG ID for non-ARIN region
> company?
I just forwarded this to an appropriate person at ARIN to give you an official
answer.
-Bill
signature.asc
> On Apr 1, 2022, at 12:15 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> …in a run-of-the-mill web hoster?
> I’m happy to take private replies and summarize/anonymize back to the list,
> if people prefer.
I asked the same question on Twitter, and got quite a lot of answers in both
places pretty qu
…in a run-of-the-mill web hoster?
This is really a question specifically for folks with web-site-hosting
businesses.
If you had, say, ten million web site customers, each with their own unique
domain name, how many IPv4 addresses would you think was a reasonable number to
host those on? HTTP
> On Mar 12, 2022, at 11:47 AM, Patrick Bryant wrote:
> Unlike Layer 3 disruptions, dropping or disrupting support for the .ru TLD
> can be accomplished without disrupting the Russian population's ability to
> access information and services in the West.
Quoting from
> On Mar 10, 2022, at 5:42 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
> I don’t understand your comment. I don’t think our statements are the same at
> all.
Perhaps not. My goal is to minimize Internet disconnection. Maybe that’s not
your goal. I was trying to give what you wrote the most generous possible
> On Mar 10, 2022, at 4:25 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
> In my view, there is a core problematic statement in this document:
> I think it is a colossal mistake to weaponize the Internet. The potential for
> unintended consequences is huge.
It sounds like your problem statement and ours are the
> On Mar 10, 2022, at 1:24 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> while i abhor the russian invasion of the ukraine, and have put my money
> where my mouth is
(As an aside to others, our friends at the .UA ccTLD have recommended this as a
useful place to donate: https://www.comebackalive.in.ua/donate It’s
I very much thank all of you who participated in this drafting effort, and I’m
really happy that the document is out:
https://www.pch.net/resources/Papers/Multistakeholder-Imposition-of-Internet-Sanctions.pdf
Now we can focus on operationalization. Mailing list, web site, etc. are in
the
r 7, 2022, at 8:55 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
> Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
>
> > This applies exclusively to Russian federal government networks, not ISPs
> > or telecom operators.
>
>
> https://twitter.com/krisnova/status/1500590779047170048?s=12
>
> says otherwise.
>
>
> -Hank
>
> On Mar 7, 2022, at 9:02 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 11:49:54PM +0100,
> Bill Woodcock wrote
> a message of 62 lines which said:
>
>> This applies exclusively to Russian federal government networks, not
>> ISPs or telecom opera
>> According to Nexta (Belorussian media outlet: https://nexta.tv ,
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nexta ) Russia has begun active preparations
>> to disconnection from the global Internet.
>>
>> No later than March 11, all servers and domains must be transferred to the
>> Russian zone. In
> On Feb 28, 2022, at 3:29 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Any recommendations for a CA with a published policy allowing an IP
> address SAN (Subject Alternative Name)?
> Both Quad9 got their certificate from DigiCert:
>
>Issuer: C = US, O = DigiCert Inc, CN = DigiCert TLS Hybrid ECC SHA384
>
> On Feb 26, 2022, at 12:07 AM, Jeroen Massar via NANOG wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 20220225, at 23:45, Matt Harris wrote:
>>
>> Hey folks,
>> I'm looking at an ASN 394183 and I can't find any whois or other contact
>> data.
Yeah, in the wake of our peering survey, we’ve been looking into this…
> On Jan 31, 2022, at 8:02 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
>
>
> Are you talking about an SFP28 module that can link at 25Gb, but also 1Gb?
>
> We just put 1Gb SFPs in the SFP28 ports and they work fine. I have not seen a
> single module that does both, but admittedly, I have not looked too
Hey, does anyone know of an SFP28 capable of rate-adapting down from 25G on the
cage side down to 1G on the line side? Can be copper or fiber on the line
side, I don’t care, my interest is in the chip inside.
Thanks,
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message
> On Nov 13, 2021, at 5:02 PM, Glenn McGurrin via NANOG wrote:
>
> I had a bit of an odd one this morning
It’s this:
https://www.engadget.com/fbi-email-server-hack-221052368.html
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
> On Oct 29, 2021, at 6:55 PM, Denis Fondras wrote:
> Le Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Bill Woodcock a écrit :
>> If you’re peering with an MLPA route-server, you’re welcome to include just
>> the route-server’s ASN, if that’s easiest, rather than trying to include e
the results to the community.
-Bill Woodcock
Executive Director
Packet Clearing House
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
> On Oct 9, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Masataka Ohta
> wrote:
> It may be that facebook uses all the four name server IP addresses
> in each edge node. But, it effectively kills essential redundancy
> of DNS to have two or more name servers (at separate locations)
> and the natural consequence is, as
> On Oct 7, 2021, at 6:25 PM, Jean St-Laurent via NANOG wrote:
>
> Nice document.
>
> In section 2.5 Routing, this is written:
>
> Distributing Authoritative Name Servers via Shared Unicast Addresses...
>
> organizations implementing these practices should
> always provide at least one
Ok, I lied, I’m still awake.
I got my first successful Facebook main page load at 23:13 UTC, for an overall
duration of 8:33, or 513 minutes. Multiplied by three billion users, that’s
1.54 trillion person-minutes.
That’s a tera-lapse!
Have we had one of those before?
> On Oct 5, 2021, at 12:16 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Oct 4, 2021, at 11:41 PM, Baldur Norddahl
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> man. 4. okt. 2021 23.33 skrev Bill Woodcock :
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 4, 2021, at 11:21 PM,
> On Oct 4, 2021, at 11:41 PM, Baldur Norddahl
> wrote:
>
>
>
> man. 4. okt. 2021 23.33 skrev Bill Woodcock :
>
>
> > On Oct 4, 2021, at 11:21 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Oct 4, 2021, at 11:10 PM, Bill Woodcock
> On Oct 4, 2021, at 11:50 PM, Ryan Brooks wrote:
> DNS was a victim in this outage, not the cause.
You are absolutely correct. However, people who don’t have this problem avoid
having this problem by not putting all their DNS eggs in one basket.
And then forgetting where they put the
> On Oct 4, 2021, at 11:21 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Oct 4, 2021, at 11:10 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>>
>> They’re starting to pick themselves back up off the floor in the last two or
>> three minutes. A few answers getting out. I imagine
> On Oct 4, 2021, at 11:10 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
> They’re starting to pick themselves back up off the floor in the last two or
> three minutes. A few answers getting out. I imagine it’ll take a while
> before things stabilize, though.
nd we’re back:
WoodyNet-2:
They’re starting to pick themselves back up off the floor in the last two or
three minutes. A few answers getting out. I imagine it’ll take a while before
things stabilize, though.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
We did not use an NTA, but we did flush our cache immediately once Slack had
fixed their problem. I think that’s the right balance of carrot and stick.
-Bill
> On Oct 2, 2021, at 7:30 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> So, that wasn't fun, yesterday:
>
>
>
> On Sep 8, 2021, at 10:24 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> The next thought was SMTP
I assume someone’s tried using MX record precedence to do this? record
references with lower values than A record references, and see what happens?
Anyone have any results to share there?
> and authoritative
> On Sep 2, 2021, at 9:14 AM, Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG
> wrote:
> OmniGraffle seems to have some traction.
Yep, that’s what I’ve always used. If I need to really clean something up, I
save it out of Omnigraffle as a PDF, and clean it up in Illustrator.
> On Aug 28, 2021, at 12:48 AM, Baldur Norddahl
> wrote:
> just to point out it is not just one guy but a whole region doing business
> like that.
You’re saying a whole region consists of parties who don’t route IP traffic?
If not, you’re making a false equivalency.
> In the RIPE region we
> On Aug 27, 2021, at 10:07 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:
> I’d expect that for a court to freeze assets of AFRINIC there must be a very
> strong argument.
You know what’s funny? There are a bunch of other people copying-and-pasting
that same expectation on the AfriNIC and APNIC mailing lists,
> On Aug 27, 2021, at 11:49 PM, Baldur Norddahl
> wrote:
> Let's pretend that I am talking about a completely different case.
>
> A guy is profiting from leasing out addresses. This is clearly unfair as he
> lied to get them back then. However this means the addresses are actually in
> use
As many of you are aware, AfriNIC is under legal attack by Heng Lu / “Cloud
Innovation.”
John Curran just posted an excellent summary of the current state of affairs
here:
https://teamarin.net/2021/08/27/afrinic-and-the-stability-of-the-internet-number-registry-system/
If, like me, you
> On Aug 19, 2021, at 4:05 PM, Pirawat WATANAPONGSE via NANOG
> wrote:
> Background Information Part:
> We rent an IP Address Block and a DNS zone.
> [We have to pay the annual fees, so they are renting, yes? :-) ]
We don’t have enough information to know whether you’re renting or are the
> On Jul 28, 2021, at 3:21 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On 7/28/21 01:16, Daniel Corbe wrote:
>
>>> This is interesting... I wonder whether Anycast will still have some
>>> failure modes and break TCP connections if routing (configuration) were to
>>> chang
> On Jul 27, 2021, at 6:15 PM, Vimal wrote:
>
> AWS Global Accelerator gives anycast IPs that's good for ingress, but my
> original question was about having predictable egress IPs.
>
> It looks like having a few EIPs/a contiguous network block is the way to go.
Yes. Predictable and
> On Jul 27, 2021, at 10:54 AM, Vimal wrote:
>
> (Unsure if this is the right forum to ask this question
Sure, why not… There isn’t anywhere more appropriate, really.
> From what I understand, IP Anycast can be used to steer traffic into a server
> that's close to the client.
That’s the
> On Jun 28, 2021, at 5:19 AM, Scott Aldrich wrote:
>
> Anyone have an idea how to get HE/ShadowServer,org servers to stop
> attempting to penetrate the comcast drop at my house?
> Their website claims altruism.. but my logs dont support that claim.
I have no connection with Shadowserver, and
> On May 15, 2021, at 9:05 PM, Tom Daly wrote:
>
> Hello NANOG'ers!
>
> I'm observing a near global outage of DNS services from d.nic.so. This
> appears to be an AfriNIC anycast DNS service.
>
> Does anyone have contacts at AfriNIC for their DNS systems available?
>
> e.nic.so seems to be
> On Apr 25, 2021, at 9:40 AM, Mel Beckman wrote:
> It’s a direct militarization of a civilian utility.
I think I’d characterize it, rather, as a possible privatization of public
property.
If someone builds a house in the middle of a public park, it’s not _what
they’re doing in the house_
> On Feb 17, 2021, at 7:41 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> Statistics suck, until you attempt to produce your own.
I don’t even know what word you replace “suck” with, when you’re doing it
yourself. What’s suck cubed?
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message
Are all y’all allergic to Wikipedia or something?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_recursive_name_server
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
> On Jan 10, 2021, at 4:56 PM, Mark Seiden wrote:
>
> at the risk of providing more heat than light, trump violated the
> Presidential Records Act repeatedly by later taking down (aka destroying) his
> own unwise tweets. this repeated violation of law using twitter itself would
> have been
> On Jan 10, 2021, at 4:03 PM, sro...@ronan-online.com wrote:
> Another interesting angle here is that it as ruled President couldn’t block
> people, because his Tweets were government communication.
Right, the _government_ can’t discriminate in which of its citizens it
communicates with, and
> On Jan 7, 2021, at 7:31 PM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
> NOC tours seem like a very 1990's thing
Cough, cough *Terremark* cough, cough *disco lights* cough cough.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
> On Dec 25, 2020, at 9:16 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>> I Have an RB4011 and while it does work very well for the price it is not
>> really practical for the sort of people who don't reside on this list.
> Which says what about 10Gbps-in-the-home practicality?
Mark is right, you’re wrong. 10G
> On Nov 10, 2020, at 5:05 PM, Kate Gerry wrote:
> I am running on a huge assumption here, but I think Phoenix-IX runs on
> donated infrastructure.
I believe that’s the case.
> I also wonder how the other Ninja-IX exchanges are running, I haven't heard
> anything about them, is there the
> On Sep 14, 2020, at 9:31 PM, Kate Gerry wrote:
>
> Does anybody have a contact who works at Phoenix-IX? I have been attempting
> to reach somebody there for a while now without any luck.
>
> Attempts to each out to peer...@phoenix-ix.net as well as Ninja-IX have been
> without any luck.
>> On Sun, Aug 30, 2020, 6:02 PM Ross Tajvar wrote:
>> Other than lack of options, why would anyone use them?
>>
> On Aug 30, 2020, at 6:41 PM, Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
> Connectivity and latency (of Level3 which was acquired).
Yeah. What I think a lot of us liked was Global Crossing. When
> On Jun 18, 2020, at 2:28 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> No one needs strict priority queues anymore, which was absolutely
> needed at one point in time.
What time was that?
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
> On May 27, 2020, at 2:42 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> I have had problems with OSP construction ostensibly delayed by closed
> permitting agencies.
Several people have said this, now, both back to the NANOG list and to me
privately, so I’ve conveyed that back. Having more specific anecdotes,
> On May 27, 2020, at 3:40 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> I have not heard of any problems with access for ISP and communications
> workers in any U.S. state or locality during the pandemic.
> Did I miss a big problem requiring the FCC chairman and CISA Director send a
> letter?
That was one of
> On 2020-05-13 11:00, Mark Delany wrote:
>> On 13May20, Denys Fedoryshchenko allegedly wrote:
>>> What about introducing some cache offloading, like CDN doing? (Google,
>>> Facebook, Netflix, Akamai, etc)
>>> Maybe some opensource communities can help as well
>> Surely someone has already thought
> On May 1, 2020, at 1:19 PM, Lee wrote:
> On 5/1/20, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>>
>>> On May 1, 2020, at 6:19 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
>>> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/05/01/icann_stops_dot_org_sale/
>>> I know this has been bantered about on the li
> On May 1, 2020, at 1:56 PM, james jones wrote:
>
> I don't know if this feasible, I would rather see the ORG TLD in the hands of
> a nonprofit. That is just a personal feeling. I don't how practical that
> would be though.
That was, right up until the very last moment, a hard requirement
> On May 1, 2020, at 6:19 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/05/01/icann_stops_dot_org_sale/
> I know this has been bantered about on the list in the past. Great (IMHO) to
> see this happen.
Yeah, this is an excellent result in the first-half of the fight. Now that
> On Mar 25, 2020, at 4:59 PM, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote:
> UUCP doesn't even have the system-to-system (real time) requirement that NNTP
> has.
Brian Buhrow and I replaced a completely failing
database-synchronization-over-Microsoft-Exchange system with UUCP across
American President
>> In France I must show a paper (not smartphone) printed permit, each
>> sortie one different paper. The receiver of it (police) takes it in
>> his/her gloved hands then s/he passes it back to me. I do not have
>> gloves. I wished the receiver did not use the same gloves for each
>> pereson
> On Mar 14, 2020, at 7:05 AM, Brielle wrote:
> I personally like Dokuwiki a lot.
Dokuwiki is definitely my favorite as well. The UI is appropriate to the task,
so you get work done quickly and without a lot of fuss.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description:
> On 2/25/20 6:32 PM, Norman Jester wrote:
> I’m in the process of choosing hardware
> for a 30 story building. If anyone has experience with this I’d appreciate
> any tips.
>
> There are two fiber pairs running up the building riser. I need to put a POE
> switch on each floor using this fiber.
Last I knew it had pretty much devolved into intra-campus and local A/R
interconnection, but our contacts here have retired as well.
-Bill
> On Feb 10, 2020, at 21:15, Matt Peterson wrote:
>
>
> Wondering if SD-NAP is still functional? PeeringDB entry looks pretty
>> I think people are going to reject the idea that they need to subscribe
>> to a dozen streaming services at $10-$20/mo. each and will be driven
>> back the good old "single source" (piracy) they used to use before 1
>> (or perhaps 2) streaming services kept them happy enough to abandon
>>
he attack would affect HKIX which,
> although not really handling 99% of HK Internet traffic, does carry up to
> 1.4Tbps of Internet traffic at peak.
>
> Che-Hoo
> no longer with HKIX
>
>
>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 9:14 AM Bill Woodcock wrote:
>>
>>
>>
> On Nov 20, 2019, at 1:41 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the replies. My conclusion is that no one here
> knows whether HKIX handles 99% of internet traffic for HK or not.
That’s incorrect. I’m here, and I know that:
1) HKIX does not handle anywhere near 99% of Hong
> On Nov 15, 2019, at 5:42 AM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> I can’t find a single cls that is a good peering spot
Correct. The optimum location for peering is at the center of population
density and the center of economic transaction density, since that minimizes
average cable lengths to users.
> On Nov 14, 2019, at 7:39 AM, Anoop Ghanwani wrote:
> RFC 7094 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7094) describes the pitfalls & risks
> of using TCP with an anycast address. It recognizes that there are valid use
> cases for it, though.
> Specifically, section 3.1 says this:
>Most
> On Oct 31, 2019, at 6:42 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> There is just so much I want to make sarcastic comments about, but I worry
> about offending future potential employers (all of them).
> https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-takes-steps-enforce-quality-standards-rural-broadband-0
"The Bureaus
> On Nov 1, 2019, at 12:37 AM, Jim wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 1:08 PM Jeff Shultz wrote:
>> What has most people (from anecdotal observation) concerned is that we
>> are usually more than one or two carriers out from an IXP where the
>> speed test server will be...
>
> It sounds like
> The correct answer is use fiber.
> Not sure I would bring an inter building link in copper onto an expensive
> core switch though.
Yeah.
> Don't know of anything in higher density than "one port”.
This on Amazon:
.Org, .pr, and a couple of root letters should be on our Puerto Rico node
already, along with several hundred other TLDs.
-Bill
> On Jul 6, 2019, at 17:00, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>
>
> It would be interesting if ICANN, Verisign and Afilias were able to join the
> IX as
> On May 7, 2019, at 4:12 PM, william manning wrote:
>
> somewhere, I have a DVD of the Route Server logs from when we first turned up
> the NSF/NAPS (circa 1994) until the UO service came online.
Well, if you ever run across them again, I’m sure Brad and Steve and I would
all be happy to
> On May 6, 2019, at 12:47 PM, John Osmon wrote:
>
> I've got a need to look for some announcements from the mid 1990s.
> The oldest I've found at at the University of Oregon Route Views
> Project, but the earliest I can find there appears to be November of
> 1997.
That’s when PCH began
I imagine that the “description” of each entry in the list should include a
machine-readable field indicating the use.
There was a question about the use-case... I’m sure a lot of people in the ops
community have their own reasons related to routing and filtering and so forth,
but there’s
> On Mar 19, 2019, at 1:55 PM, Frank Habicht wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 19/03/2019 23:13, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>> Generally, static lists like that are difficult to maintain when
>> they’re tracking multiple routes from multiple parties.
>
> agreed.
> a
> On Mar 19, 2019, at 1:11 PM, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
>
> On 2019-03-19 21:04, Hansen, Christoffer wrote:
>> https://github.com/netravnen/well-known-anycast-prefixes/blob/master/list.txt
>> PR's and/or suggestions appreciated! (Can be turned into $lirDB friendly
>> format->style RPSL)
>
>
> On Mar 19, 2019, at 1:04 PM, Hansen, Christoffer
> wrote:
>
> something like this?
>
> https://github.com/netravnen/well-known-anycast-prefixes/blob/master/list.txt
>
> PR's and/or suggestions appreciated! (Can be turned into $lirDB friendly
> format->style RPSL)
Generally, static lists
1 - 100 of 332 matches
Mail list logo
