On Fri, 2021-01-15 at 10:26 -0500, Bryan Fields wrote:
>
> It's still stored unencrypted on the server, and the admin can see
> all.
This is true. I was just referring to transit leakage.
> If
> you want it secure, you have to run gpg and encrypt the body.
Again, true.
Cheers,
b.
On Fri, 2021-01-15 at 03:33 -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> email from a friend who uses protonmail as their MTA suddenly started
> to
> be opportunistically encrypted with pgp; i.e. the sender's MUA did
> nothing to cause the encryption. i believe this started when i
> provided
> my pgp public key
On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 12:45 -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:
> I believe they're only blocking the HE v6 prefixes used for the VPN
> service.
I don't use any VPN service of HE but I still get errors from Netflix
when my client chooses my HE tunnel prefix as it's source.
Or I guess I should say I was,
On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 17:32 -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:
> IPv6?
I realize this list is for network operators, but as a user, when your
ISP doesn't provide IPv6, this is not possible. Even with
tunnelbrokers like HE as they are blocked at Netflix. I have to put
rules in my firewall to force the
On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 09:50 -0700, Stephen Satchell wrote:
>
> As I build up my new
> firewall, I'll turn off public SSH access completely, and instead use
> a
> robust VPN implementation. (Which has its own issues.)
How does that solve the problem at hand in any way?
The abuse/probing just
On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 11:23 -0600, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
>
> Well, while we are already engaged in the thread, some of you may be
> interested to know (especially if you find yourself with time on your
> hands these days), that you *can* actually get money from these
> scum. In fact, it
On Tue, 2020-04-21 at 18:54 +, Mel Beckman wrote:
> It’s not really oversold bandwidth. It’s just that the turnaround
> time for a bolus of data is too long for two-way video conferencing
> to be smooth or reliable. It’s like video conferencing using post
> cards :)
Except that
On Tue, 2020-04-21 at 11:11 -0700, Sabri Berisha wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> Where I worked, phy transmissions are scheduled based on tokens. A UT
> must have a token to transmit data. If there is no congestion, a
> token will be available and the UT or ground station may transmit.
> Congestion does not
A friend of mine just recently got Xplornet satellite service at his
rural home. I'm well aware of the latency issues with satellite
although frankly his latency is much better than I had feared it would
be and is around 600-700ms.
But what seems to be worse than the latency is the "burstiness"
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 18:37 -0500, b...@theworld.com wrote:
>
> Why don't they just ask the phone companies who are billing these
> robocallers who they are and we can arrest them.
Exactly.
I have always maintained that if my phone number were one of those
"premium" numbers (1-976 -- maybe I am
On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 13:54 -0600, Blake Hudson wrote:
>
> Isn't this exactly why Net Neutrality is a thing:
Isn't it a "dead" thing in the USofA?
> So that people (or
> companies) are free to develop new applications or enhance existing
> ones
> without running into a quagmire of different
On Sat, 2020-01-04 at 16:32 +0200, Max Tulyev wrote:
>
> Also, we implemented immediate answer and voice menu option, it says
> "Welcome, press ... to reach ...!" and circles. So me (as the telco
> operator) receive the money for call termination, and real customer
> do
> not get a spam call.
On Mon, 2019-12-30 at 16:52 -0800, Sabri Berisha wrote:
>
> Who needs more than 640Kb of memory?
>
> We don't know what the future holds. This is an interesting read,
> featuring 5g to perform a "hologram" phone call:
> https://www.bbc.com/news/business-45009458
While I appreciate that this is
On Mon, 2019-12-30 at 09:50 -0500, Shane Ronan wrote:
>
> Also, keep in mind that 10 years ago, you didn't know you would want
> or
> need 25mbits to your phone,
Who needs 25mbits to their phone?
> but I'd bet that now you'd have a hard time
> living without it.
I already live without it (by a
On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 11:02 -0800, William Herrin wrote:
>
> I call your phone number.
> Your phone company compares my number against your whitelist. Ring
> through on match.
> If no match, "You have reached Name. Press 2 to leave a message.
> Press
> 3 to enter your code. Press 0 or stay on the
On Thu, 2019-11-28 at 10:50 -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
> While I agree about the likely outcome, I will point out that
> consumers have been
> begging for unbundling for years.
This is not the "unbundling" that consumers have been begging for.
Rather I would submit that it's actually quite the
On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 15:32 -0800, Matthew Petach wrote:
> My point was that Disney has a lock on much of the content kids love.
Which was, until Disney+, on Netflix.
https://www.theverge.com/2012/12/4/3727688/netflix-streaming-rights-new-disney-marvel-pixar-movies
> Netflix/HBO/AmazonPrime,
On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 12:53 -0800, Matthew Petach wrote:
> Different target audiences.
That are already satisfied with existing services, so no new target
audiences.
> Now the parents can be watching "Good Omens" or "Game of Thrones" on
> Netflix while the kids are streaming "The Lion King" on
On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 08:17 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> People can really only watch one thing at a time.
This is my thought also.
> Net streaming of the last mile
> is unlikely to change much. Just where that content is coming from
> may change.
Indeed.
Cheers,
b.
signature.asc
On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 15:26 -0500, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
>
> I can foresee a lot of families subscribing to Netflix *and* Disney+
> because neither one has all the content the family wants to watch.
Absolutely. But the time spent watching Disney would *replace* (not be
in addition to, or
On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 15:08 -0500, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
> Netflix has done a great job deploying OC Appliances. A Netflix
> user != Amazon, Hulu, etc...
Fair enough, in the cases where operators are Netflix OC partners and
might see a shift in network use from a Netflic OC appliance to
On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 19:49 +, Justin Krejci wrote:
>
> As the service grows in popularity, and its breadth of content and
> manageable price is likely to attract a lot of growth, I'd like to
> plan for any necessary augmentations to the network.
From the end-user/viewer network capacity
On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 22:42 +, Chris Kimball via NANOG wrote:
> Does anyone have any more information on this?
Yeah, like who (in the private sector -- we all knew the NSA already
are doing this) has access to and is archiving *everyone*s text
messages? And why?
Cheers,
b.
signature.asc
On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 17:12 +, Rod Beck wrote:
> https://www.lightreading.com/video/ott/whats-at-stake-as-the-streaming-battle-builds-/d/d-id/754841?
> [
>
On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 09:15 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Hi Folks,
Hi.
> While in the US soon all Firefox users will *NOT* use your DNS
> Recursives configured using DHCP anymore
> (NXDOMAIN use-application-dns.net to avoid that[1]).
What am I misunderstanding? Isn't use-application-dns.net
On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 15:37 +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
wrote:
> Ask the vendor to support RFC8585.
>
>
>
> Also, you can do it with OpenWRT.
>
>
>
> I think 464XLAT is a better option and both of them are supported by
> OpenWRT.
>
>
>
> You can also use OpenSource (Jool) for
On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 23:13 +0300, Scott Christopher wrote:
>
> Because it will get spammed if publicly listed in WHOIS.
I will take that at *least* as ironic as you meant it.
b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 11:59 -0400, Paul Timmins wrote:
> Chris it would be trivial for this to be fixed, nearly overnight, by
> creating some liability on the part of carriers for illicit use of
> caller ID data on behalf of their customers.
This 1000%. Once legal liability is in place, the
On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 12:12 -0400, John Levine wrote:
>
> There are perfectly good reasons to use v6: no NAT in front of your
> devices,
Check.
> every service gets its own IP,
Roger.
> better connections to devices
> on mobile networks and home networks that are behind v4 NATs.
Bingo!
All
On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 10:26 +1200, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote:
> I've found a VPS provider (https://www.vultr.com/pricing/) that
> offers
> cheaper instances with IPv6 only.
That's an interesting one. Neat to see.
But it would probably be a stretch to try to use that as example of why
my ISP needs
Hi,
I am trying to make a case (to old fuddy-duddies, which is why I even
need to actually make a case) for IPv6 for my own selfish reasons. :-)
I wonder if anyone has any references to interesting/useful/otherwise
resources on are only available to IPv6 users that they can forward to
me.
On Tue, 2019-01-15 at 00:24 -0500, b...@theworld.com wrote:
> I'd like to go on record as saying that I PREFER top-posting.
>
> Why dig through what you've already read to see the new comments?
Because in long discussion threads, you lose the context to exactly
what a particular person is
On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 17:28 -0600, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> Hi Brian,
Hi,
> But what's exactly at 2a03:2880:f012:3:face:b00c:0:1?
It's one of the endpoints involved in Facebook's Messenger service.
IIRC it's "graph.facebook.com", although I note that that address is
currently answering
On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 21:44 -0500, Harald Koch wrote:
>
> To OP: I believe that every last-mile provider in Canda is still
> offering IPv6 as a best-effort, unsupported service.
Yeah. I'm aware of this. But I want to give them the benefit of the
doubt that this problem is simply ignorance and
On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 21:48 +0200, Max Tulyev wrote:
> Well known problem.
Interesting. As in a general problem across the Internet or a well
known problem with Cogeco specifically?
> You can use our tunnel broker connection (tb.netassist.ua) as a
> workaround.
Thanks. But I actually already
I've been trying to figure out why I can reach an IPv6 address at
Facebook (2a03:2880:f012:3:face:b00c:0:1) through (only) one of my two
Internet connections as well as via an HE IPv6 tunnel but not the other
of my two ISP connections
At one point in time a traceroute was dying inside of he.net:
36 matches
Mail list logo
