RE: what is acceptible jitter for voip and videoconferencing?

> > Looks like codecs still are rapidly evolving in walled gardens. I just learned > about 'Satin'. > Yeah There are also some opensourced like lyra from google with v2 released last year. https://opensource.googleblog.com/2022/09/lyra-v2-a-better-faster-and-more-versatile-speech-codec.html

RE: Lossy cogent p2p experiences?

> If you applications can tolerate reordering, per-packet is fine. In the public > Internet space, it seems we aren't there yet. Yeah this During lockdown here in Italy one day we started getting calls about performance issues performance degradation, vpns dropping or becoming unusable, and

RE: Are we back to the 2000's again?

>You wouldn't download a boat ;) Wouldn't that be a boatload? Sorry it's Monday morning and I could resist...

ITNOG7 may 19th

Hello everyone, Itnog7 is taking place in Bologna May 9th and 10th and we have published our CFP. Topics Past event feedback has shown interest from the attendees in sessions that are practical and applicable to their networks. This year we will be giving preference to presentations and

RE: Typical last mile battery runtime (protecting against power cuts)

Hi, > At $day_job, I have a team of engineers who are oncall for critical services > in > the United Kingdom. For $reasons, the national power grid is announcing the > possibility of rolling power cuts over the coming months. > Right now it's "unlikely", but possible. If cuts do happen, it'll

RE: BCP38 For BGP Customers

Hi Mike > This may not exist yet, but what about a uRPF-like feature that uses RPKI, > IRR, etc. instead of current BGP feed? There is rfc8704 that extends urpf But I do not know of any commercial available solutions Brian

RE: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls)

Hi, > > Most operators here have been against stir/shaken as a means to resolve the > problems. > > What reasons? > That it is complex and would take too much time and money, that it is only effective if done on international level and should only be done if decided on a European level.

RE: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls)

> The federal law in 47 USC 227(e) says: > > (1)In general > > It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person > outside the United States if the recipient is within the United States, in > connection with any voice service or text messaging service, to cause any

RE: Disney+ Contact

Hi Mark >Anyone from Disney who can help with a geo issue on-list? We have customers in >South Africa mapping to India. Thanks. Did you try the emails in thebrotherswisp geo page? I have had some success though the Techops emails. Sometimes it does take a while for a response... Disney+:

RE: HE.net and BGP Communities

> Google has let you down, 6730 (sunrise) is not 6939 (HE) ;) > Oops I should check thing better at the end of the day .. My bad

RE: HE.net and BGP Communities

Hi, >I do understand the reasoning behind preferring customer routes.   However in >the case where a customer of a customer also connects to you directly via >peering doesn't it make sense to prefer the direct connection?  or at >least >not prefer the customer learned routes. Business not

ITNOG6

Hello Everyone, The 15th and 16th of September we will be holding ITNOG6 in Bologna Italy. EPF is being held in Rome from the 12th to the 14th and Bologna is a short speed train ride away, so if you are attending why not come and nog Italian style? We have published the event details and call

RE: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers

Here in Italy there have been a lot of investments to get better broadband. Such as government sponsored bundles for areas with no return on investments, for schools etc with a lot of focus on reaching gigabit speeds The results have been mainly positive even though there are delays. On the end

RE: Disney+ Issues

Hi Norman >Anyone from Disney+ here? If you can reply off-list I'd appreciate it. I have >emailed every place I can think of to solve a geoip problem affecting hundreds >of customers, no reply in weeks. Yeah we just went through the same thing. Many other providers in Italy have been impacted

RE: NXDOMAIN Resolvers

Ciao Antonia, If you are specifically looking for the Italian market try itnog. Itnog.it This has been discussed a couple of times on our telegram group and more lengthy questions can go on the mailing list. Both English and Italian are accepted. Some providers here in Italy offer protection as

RE: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging

> On 2/9/22 09:30, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > > > Let me repeat that there is a service which is officially intended to > > be pinged/queried/etc, the RIPE Anchors. > > Yeah, but how do we get out there in a manner that Jane can easily find and > use, like she does 8.8.8.8? It wouldn't be

GTT contact

Hello everyone, Is there someone from GTT on list that can contact me in pvt? For over a week we have been seeing loss and latency between Frankfurt and Milan as reported in outages by Lukas https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/2022-February/014230.html After a week of TT updates and

RE: BGP Route Monitoring

Hi Mihai, Have you looked into object tracking? This will work if the route state changes and is removed from the routing table. So if the route is no longer present it will trigger for sure. I admit I have not tried to see if it would trigger on a change from peer 1 to peer 2, as the route is

RE: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006

> On 11/26/2021 1:09 PM, Colin Legendre wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We have ... > > > > ASR1006  that has following cards... > > 1 x ESP40 > > 1 x SIP40 > > 4 x SPA-1x10GE-L-V2 > > 1 x 6TGE > > 1 x RP2 > > > > We've been having latency and packet loss during peak periods... > > > > We notice all is

RE: Increase bandwidth usage in partial-mesh network?

Has anyone come across any product or technology that can handle the multi-path-ness and the private-network-ness like a regular router, but also provides the intelligent per-flow path steering based on e.g. latency, like an SD-WAN device (and/or some firewalls)? Maybe add a little bit of

RE: [External] Re: uPRF strict more

Hi > > > What it does allow is for *deliberate* blackholing for traffic; if you > > null-route a prefix, you now block incoming traffic from that subnet > > as well. This can be useful and it is how we are using URPF. > > I don't think it is implied here, but just for clarification this is >

RE: uPRF strict more

Hi, > Having said that, I'm not convinced anyone should use uRPF at all. > Because you should already know what IP addresses are possible behind the > port, if you do, you can do ACL, and ACL is significantly lower cost in PPS > in a > typical modern lookup engine. > uRPF still has it's place

RE: [EXTERNAL] VoIP Provider DDoSes

Hi >Something you may want to consider is to put ACLs as far upstream as possible >from your SBCs and only allow through what you need to the SBCs.  For example, >apply a filter only permitting UDP 5060 and your RTP port range to your SBCs >and then blocking everything else.  This is free and

RE: IPv6 woes - RFC

Hi, > > v4 is so thoroughly fragmented and v6 is a lot less likely to become > > so. > > It is true that fragmentation is a problem. However, it merely means that IPv6 > address space will also be fragmented and that > IPv4 can but IPv6 can't be deployed at full scale, Just this week We had our

RE: Alien waves

Hi, Not related to who is using them really but.. The presentation, From Alien Waves to Disaggregated Optical Network by Paolo Boletta from ITNOG3 meeting may be of interest to you. The site contains both the presentation and the ½ hour video. https://www.itnog.it/itnog3/ It covers the use if

route-views.oregon-ix.net

Hello, Does anyone know if the route-views.oregon-ix.net name been retired? ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> type=a route-views.oregon-ix.net @phloem.uoregon.edu ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 4 ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>>

RE: Buying IPs with poor reputation

Hi, Our experience has been that most blacklist operators/owners are more than willing to remove IPs after a change of ownership, same with updating of geo IP services. The bigger problem for us has been the huge number of statically defined or never updated blacklists/geo blocking by

RE: EMail server gets blocked by Microsoft

Hi Dominque, And sign up for snds https://sendersupport.olc.protection.outlook.com/snds/index.aspx It will give you the status of your IPs and you can get jenkmail reports etc. Brian From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mel Beckman Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:19 PM To: Dominque Roux Cc:

RE: Submitting Fake Geolocation for blocks to Data Brokers and RIRs

> > Question - if a country is not assigned to an allocation or sub-assignment, > what does it default to within the RIPE region? > > In the AFRINIC region, for example, it would be MU (Mauritius), as that is > where AFRINIC are located. AFAIK Ripe does not set a default, it is up to the LIR.

RE: Submitting Fake Geolocation for blocks to Data Brokers and RIRs

Hi, >>If the endpoint (e.g. web server) is physically located in Germany and >>you're helping a client misrepresent that it's located in Estonia in >>order to evade a legal requirement that it be located in Estonia then >>you've made yourself a party to criminal fraud. >While I agree with the

RE: an IP hijacking attempt

Hi Noah, > Would you care to share the said prefix?   This is the prefix we found associated with their name in the afrinic db. inetnum:169.239.204.0 - 169.239.207.255 Cheers, Brian

RE: an IP hijacking attempt

Hi Daniel, > > Tracing it back to the originator of the route is of course a good first step. Yes, we have done that and the results were not good. The company that created the LOA is registered in the Seychelles and they have IPs that were/are being revoked by Afrinic remarks:* * * *

Re: an IP hijacking attempt

point of LOA’s is to facilitate this verification. -mel via cell > On Mar 9, 2021, at 10:01 AM, Brian Turnbow via NANOG wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > We received a strange request that I wanted to share. > An email was sent to us asking to confirm a LOA from a diligent ISP. >

an IP hijacking attempt

Hello everyone, We received a strange request that I wanted to share. An email was sent to us asking to confirm a LOA from a diligent ISP. The Loa was a request to open bgp for an AS , that is not ours, to announce a /23 prefix that is ours. So basically this entity sent to their upstream a

RE: Need someone with clue @ Network Solutions.

Hi Matt It has been a long time since I’ve used network solutions but from what I remember in their interface you have a section advanced or more settings to create your dns servers before associating them to the domain. And it is in this section where you can create or change the dns name and

Re: Re[4]: Disney+ Geolocation (again)

https://help.disneyplus.com/csp instead. Please kindly remove from your documentation and do not email thse two @disneystreaming.com email addresses. Thank you J -- Original Message -- From: "Brian Turnbow via NANOG" mailto:nanog@nanog.org>> To: "Mike Hammett" ma

RE: Re[2]: Disney+ Geolocation (again)

Hi Mike, You may want to add technical operations services team techops-servi...@disneystreaming.com We wrote to the distribution address and they replied forwarding it to services Brian From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Friday,

RE: 100G over 100 km of dark fiber

Hi jared as others have pointed out there are lots of options inphi offers these https://www.inphi.com/products/colorz/ or use a box like packetlight, here is a Arista solution brief https://www.arista.com/assets/data/pdf/Whitepapers/Arista_Packetlight_100G_Extension_Solution.pdf and if

RE: microsoft mail contact

Hi Nick > > We recently acquired some IP space, but it seems outlook does not want to > receive email from that space. > > If there's someone that knows what we need to do, we would be grateful > for any pointers in the right direction. > First sign up for snds and get the ips under your

RE: IP addresses on subnet edge (/24)

> On 9/14/20 2:25 PM, Andrey Khomyakov wrote: > > TL;DR I suspect there are middle boxes that don't like IPs ending in > > .255. Anyone seen that? > > Yes. We'd every so often get random complaints that "my friend can't reach > my website but I can", etc., with not enough detail to track it down.

RE: Partial vs Full tables

Hi all, > > Loose mode RPF will essentially drop traffic received on the interface if the > router does not have any route for. (will not match a default or a discard > route, at least in IOS-XR) > > As Bill has pointed out, this may drop traffic from some peering networks that > are not in the