Looking to work through GeoIP issue with Square

My google-fu is failing me - I'm looking to find out which GeoIP service Square uses, or a path to work through a GeoIP issue with them. A client of ours uses Square and unfortunately one of the blocks (23.247.204.0/22) we received at ARIN was at one time associated with France. As you can

Unexplainable router log entries mentioning IPSEC from Yahoo IPs

Curious if someone can point me in the right direction. In the last three days our core router (Cisco 7609) has logged the following events: Dec 16 19:04:59.027 CST: %CRYPTO-4-RECVD_PKT_INV_SPI: decaps: rec'd IPSEC packet has invalid spi for destaddr=, prot=50, spi=0xEF7ED795(4018067349),

BGPmon alerting me about prefixes being withdrawn from Hurricane Electric attached sites

I've already emailed the HE NOC, but curious if anyone else this morning has noticed any of their prefixes going missing from Hurricane Electric attached networks. BGPmon sent me these alerts, happening at different times: Withdraw of Prefix (Code: 97) Your prefix: 104.192.56.0/22:

RE: FCC Takes Steps to Enforce Quality Standards for Rural Broadband

It recently changed from being a handful of IXPs to testing to a server that’s in the same building as one of 40+ ASNs: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-360069A1.pdf (page 35ff) The concern is that many RLEC buy transit from “Tier 2” providers that may are not on that list of

RE: CVV (was: Re: bloomberg on supermicro: sky is falling)

I have a low-cost/high interest rate account at one of the Canadian bank and each "assisted" transaction is $5. Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2018 3:35 AM To: George Michaelson Cc: North American Network Operators' Group

RE: Looking for Incapsula contact

On Behalf Of Frank Bulk Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 5:39 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Looking for Incapsula contact Emails to NOC have gone unanswered (I did have success with that a year or two ago). Have had a handful of business customers in the last week contact us about B2B web sites they c

Looking for Incapsula contact

Emails to NOC have gone unanswered (I did have success with that a year or two ago). Have had a handful of business customers in the last week contact us about B2B web sites they can't reach anymore ... of the eight documented websites, five are using Incapusla address space and others might be

BCP 38 coverage if top x providers ...

My google fu is failing me, but I believe there was a NANOG posting a year or two ago that mentioned that if the top x providers would implement BCP 38 then y% of the traffic (or Internet) would be de-spoofed. The point was that we don't even need everyone to implement BCP 38, but if the largest

Optical transceiver question

We recently purchased some generic optics from a reputable reseller that were marketed to reach 60 km. But what we found, based on the spec sheets, is that it could only reach that distance if the optics were transmitting on the high side of the transmit power range. For example, if the TX

RE: google and amazon wierdness via HE right now

Being discussed on outages, too. Our monitoring system saw access to www.amazon.com and www.cablelabs.com (over v6) down via HE ... amazon came back up for me via Zayo, but when www.cablelabs.com came back up, it was on HE. So the same as you. So I suspect HE had a hiccup. Frank -Original

RE: Packet loss on XO's network

and 5 always have packet loss - I believe it's due to ICMPv6 rate limiters protecting their CPU: Frank From: Fullenkamp, Terri L [mailto:terri.l.fullenk...@xo.com] Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 2:59 PM To: Frank Bulk <frnk...@iname.com>; nanog@nanog.org Cc: # SUP - NCC Level

RE: Packet loss on XO's network

XO contacted me offline. Things have bene stable since ~12:15 pm Central. Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 12:25 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Packet loss on XO's network Since ~11:08 am

Packet loss on XO's network

Since ~11:08 am Central our monitoring system has been reporting intermittent HTTPv6 timeouts to www.sprint.net, www.qwest.com , enterprise.com, and enterprise.ca. It goes bad for a while and then clears. Using mtr, these all have XO's network in common, and the packet

RE: DOS Attack

Here are some threads: http://markmail.org/message/4hkuymimt54snpyi http://markmail.org/message/qc67dfw2zi224ciu http://markmail.org/message/2pqnaoru5gvxwyn5 Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of K MEKKAOUI Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016

RE: Southwest Airlines captive portal

...@protrafsolutions.com] Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 5:09 PM To: Damien Burke <dam...@supremebytes.com> Cc: Frank Bulk <frnk...@iname.com>; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Southwest Airlines captive portal You got MITM'd On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Damien Burke <dam...@s

Southwest Airlines captive portal

Anyone from Southwest Airlines on this list? On a recent flight I discovered I couldn't complete payment through PayPal because my web browsers properly noticed that the Southwest Airlines SSL certificate that the captive portal was giving for PayPal didn't match up. =) I had to create an

Automated alarm notification

Is anyone aware of software, or perhaps a service, that will take SNMP traps, properly parse them, and perform the appropriate call outs based on certain content, after waiting 5 or 10 minutes for any alarms that don't clear? I looked at PagerDuty, but they don't do any SNMP trap parsing, and

RE: SMS gateways

Surprised no one has mentioned the Multimodem iSMS: http://www.multitech.com/brands/multimodem-isms Been using it for 5+ years -- first three years the code wasn't stable, needing a reboot every few months, but the latest code has been stable for 2+ years. Frank -Original Message-

RE: Broadband Router Comparisons

+1. Here's one managed option that non-Calix customers, such as WISPs, have found interesting: https://www.calix.com/systems/gigafamily-overview/GigaCenters.html Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Justin Wilson Sent: Thursday, December

RE: John McAfee: Massive DDoS attack on the internet was from smartphone botnet on popular app

Good stuff from Duane here: http://www.circleid.com/posts/20151215_verisign_perspective_on_recent_root_s erver_attacks/ Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Tony Finch Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 4:27 AM To: Jim Shankland

eBay contact that deals with IPv6

I'm looking for an eBay network engineer to contact me off-list that can dig into an IPv6 performance issue. I started monitoring ipv6.ebay.com a week or two ago and the site times out (10 second timer) regularly. The last seven days indicate it's been timing out about one-third of the time.

RE: Anyone having issues with Equinix IX out of Ashburn?

Storm caused by an L2 loop, malicious attack, bug in router code, or something else? Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Xavier Beaudouin Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 8:22 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Anyone having issues with

RE: Favorite GPON Vendor?

What does ADTRAN's NG-PON2 upgrade path have over Calix's? Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 8:49 PM To: NANOG Subject: Re: Favorite GPON Vendor? We are about do deploy

Fw: new message

Hey! New message, please read <http://arpitshah.co.in/satisfied.php?h5lk> Frank Bulk - iName.com

Fw: new message

Hey! New message, please read <http://www.leapskills.in/trust.php?ptye> Frank Bulk - iName.com

Fw: new message

Hey! New message, please read <http://hurricanedisasterphotos.com/return.php?sel30> Frank Bulk - iNAME

Fw: new message

Hey! New message, please read <http://k12techtips.com/ways.php?ie2> Frank Bulk

RE: How to wish you hadn't forced ipv6 adoption (was "How to force rapid ipv6 adoption")

So let me ask a question -- there's several folks looking at overall IPv6 usage, but what about on a per-protocol level, and compared to IPv4? Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Randy Bush Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2015 11:37 AM To: Scott

DDoS auto-mitigation best practices (for eyeball networks)

Could the community share some DDoS auto-mitigation best practices for eyeball networks, where the target is a residential broadband subscriber? I'm not asking so much about the customer communication as much as configuration of any thresholds or settings, such as: - minimum traffic volume before

RE: "Access Denied" when hitting https://www.apple.com issue over IPv4 and 6

Restored at 1:05 am U.S. Central. Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 12:19 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: "Access Denied" when hitting https://www.apple.com issue over IPv4 and 6

"Access Denied" when hitting https://www.apple.com issue over IPv4 and 6

Monitoring system reporting this since 11:11 pm U.S. Central root@nagios:/tmp# wget -6 www.apple.com --2015-09-12 00:17:55-- http://www.apple.com/ Resolving www.apple.com... 2001:590:1807:187::c77, 2001:590:1807:186::c77 Connecting to www.apple.com|2001:590:1807:187::c77|:80...

RE: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector

Does anyone else have a serial to IP dongle for devices that are IP only? That dongle would need to have telnet and SSH support. Or an IP-to-IP dongle, that would support a routing table? There's Brocade kit that has a mgmt. port, but it doesn't have its own routing table (they now have a mgmt.

RE: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector

How many IPv6 addresses do you get? Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Avi Freedman Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 7:31 PM To: Jared Mauch Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: NetFlow - path from Routers to

BT contact?

http://www.bt.com over IPv6 has been down since ~8:52 am U.S. Central. Please send me a PM if you have a contact there, or forward this over. Thanks, Frank Bonus: www.brocade.com over IPv6 has been down since last night, too, as the was removed, but I have a contact there. root@nagios:/#

RE: BT contact?

Thanks for all the responses and assistance. I'm not sure if that help was the reason or not, but the site came back up at 4:16 pm U.S. Central. Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 2:32 PM

RE: Bright House IMAP highwater warning real?

What do you think their message should say? We struggled over this, too, and settled on some soft language, included information on how to purchase more storage, and also provided our email address and phone numbers. Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG

RE: Access to nanog.cluepon.net

I see that nanog.cluepon.net is still down – is Richard S. *the* person for this? Frank From: Mike Hammett [mailto:na...@ics-il.net] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 1:47 PM To: Josh Luthman Cc: NANOG list; Frank Bulk Subject: Re: Access to nanog.cluepon.net Still down here

Tunable SFP

Anyone know if tunable SFPs exist? I've googled around on this, but only found fixed wave-length SFPs. Or of a tunable SFP+ that can operate in SFP port as 1G? Frank

RE: Tunable SFP

Thanks -- can you point me to any suppliers? Frank -Original Message- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net] Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2015 12:41 PM To: Frank Bulk Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Tunable SFP They do exist. They tend to have tighter link budgets as compared

RE: Tunable SFP

Thanks, that's very helpful. They have several models there: https://www.flexoptix.net/en/produkte/transceiver.html?fo_tra_formfactor=sfp #fo_tra_formfactor=sfpfo_tra_interface=05_dwdm_100ghzgan_data=true Frank -Original Message- Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2015 1:44 PM To: Frank Bulk

RE: Tunable SFP

Upon second look, these are reconfigurable. Doesn't appear to be the same as tunable. =( Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2015 2:07 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Tunable SFP Thanks, that's very

Access to nanog.cluepon.net

I'd like to update some material on nanog.cluepon.net (not very responsive to HTTP requests right now) and my account doesn't work anymore. I reached out to Richard S. but have not heard back from him - anyone else here who has admin access and can set me up again? Frank

RE: bing on v6

There are several properties that used to work and do not anymore: wireless.att.com www.att.net www.charter.com www.globalcrossing.com John B. told me a couple of days ago to stand by for dns.comcast.net and www.dnsec.comcast.net, so I'm doing that. =) And www.frontier.com has been broken for 6

RE: bing on v6

It literally came up within minutes of my posting. =) I know there are Frontier staff lurking on NANOG and I had already engaged a senior Frontier person on this last week, but he was dependent on their IT department to resolve this. Frank -Original Message- From: John Levine

RE: Hulu, ABC, Disney have blocked my entire subnet!

Brett, Please share the subnet with us. Have you followed through the list here, specifically checking Akamai, and seeing what it lists? http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/GeoIP Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent:

RE: IPTV providers in IN/Chicago

would enable competition. Maybe I'm wrong. Then again, maybe Brandon isn't in a Comcast served area. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: Frank Bulk frnk

RE: IPTV providers in IN/Chicago

I believe Vubiquity (http://www.vubiquity.com/product-portfolio/livevu/) does, as well as Comcast HITS (http://www.comcastwholesale.com/products-services/mpeg-2-content-delivery/mpeg-2-delivery-content-providers). Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On

RE: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality]

: James R Cutler [mailto:james.cut...@consultant.com] Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2015 8:51 AM To: Frank Bulk Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality] Frank, Are your measurements taken at the campus boundary or within the campus network

RE: booster to gain distance above 60km

http://www.fiberstore.com/narrow/80km-120km_v993t0/bidi-sfp+_64 http://www.fiberstore.com/narrow/80km-120km_v993t0/bidi-xfp_113What Thanks for sharing. First time I saw 10G BiDi optics at 80 km. I needed them for an application a few months ago and had to take a new approach when I only could

RE: FIXED - Re: Broken SSL cert caused by router?

Glad you figured that out. I've used three SSL evaluation websites to help me with intermediate certificate issues: https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html (will show the names and details of the certs, missing or not https://www.wormly.com/test_ssl (quick SSL tester, will point out if

RE: Level 3 Outage

Yes, see this thread: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/2015-March/007687.html Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Debottym Mukherjee Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 10:14 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Level 3 Outage Did anyone else

RE: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality]

The download/upload in our residential/business eyeball network has been trending a 95th-percentile based ratio of 9:1. If I look at a higher-ed customer of ours who has symmetric service and has a young demographic the average ratio is 11:1 and the peak ratio 8.8:1. So despite access to

RE: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality]

Yes, it's changing -- the ratio is higher. At least that's what tracking of our eyeball customers has shown over the last 6+ years. Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Satchell Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 10:13 AM To:

RE: HTTPv6 access to www.centurylink.com and www.qwest.com are down

I never heard back from anyone, but the two sites came back up 1:59 pm Central time, so it was down just over a week. Now it Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 9:39 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject

FW: HTTPv6 access to www.centurylink.com and www.qwest.com are down

Emails to what I thought were CenturyLink's NOC have gone unanswered, and the other email address resulted in an automated you're not allowed to send emails to that group. Frank -Original Message- From: Frank Bulk Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 8:22 AM To: netw...@centurytel.net; 'n

RE: gmail spam help

That's my thought, too -- add DKIM and also work through those Google forms. I didn't see any red flags when I checked an IP and your host against some email measurement sites. -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ben Whorwood Sent: Thursday,

RE: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware

Unless each customer has in their own L3 domain, you'll also want some kind of L2 isolation between ports (and also MFF) and IP source address verification (so that people can't spoof addresses) for both DHPC and static IP customers. And don't forget the IPv6 equivalents. Frank -Original

RE: cable modem firmware upgrade

And even if you updated it yourself, it's possible that your service provider's config file would automatically downgrade it. Best bet is to ask your internet provider to upgrade your modem. Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Nathan

RE: Verizon.net email admin?

FYI, this topic was discussed on this listserv in mid-October (http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2014-October/070532.html) and mailops (archives restricted to listserv members) in mid-November. In the NANOG thread reference was made that Verizon was filtering out the 107/8 network. Frank

RE: VDSL CPE Mixed Results

We've used a few Zhone ETHX-344x4 (http://www.zhone.com/products/ETHX-3400/) and been happy with the reliability. Configuration was a bugger, but if you get one of those I can share my template. Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Stetson

RE: Akron OH CO outage

Twitter has lots of news on this topic: http://fox8.com/2015/01/13/police-911-systems-down-throughout-summit-co-due-to-power-outage-at-att-office-in-akron/ http://www.newsnet5.com/news/local-news/oh-summit/summit-county-911-lines-down

RE: Google's Safe Browsing Alerts for Network Administrators

, it’s much appreciated. If it’s really just a drop in the ocean, what does it matter to you? Frank From: Joe [mailto:jbfixu...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 10:39 AM To: Frank Bulk Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Google's Safe Browsing Alerts for Network Administrators

Google's Safe Browsing Alerts for Network Administrators

I want to make this forum aware of Google's Safe Browsing Alerts for Network Administrators (https://www.google.com/safebrowsing/alerts/). I've had a link to their diagnostic page for several years (https://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=AS:hl=it-it, where is your ASN), but

RE: Ars breaks Misfortune Cookie vulnerability news to public

On what basis do you assume that there is TR-069 support in these routers? And even if there is, that the service provider manages them via TR-069? Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric Tykwinski Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 6:47 PM

RE: Google public DNS - getting SERVFAIL for any domains delegated to GoDaddy NSs

;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;targetly.co. IN A ;; Query time: 2077 msec ;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8) ;; WHEN: Sun Dec 07 12:10:22 2014 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 29 C:\Users\Frank Bulk -Original Message- From

RE: Barracuda Central Contact

http://www.barracudacentral.org/rbl/removal-request Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Keefe John Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 9:24 AM To: NANOG Subject: Barracuda Central Contact Is there anyone here from Barracuda that could help with

RE: v6 cdn problems

The Google angle is also being discussed on outages. Initial suspicions are PTB packets not flowing through tunneled connections. Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Pete Carah Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2014 4:56 PM To: nanog@nanog.org

RE: Reporting DDOS reflection attacks

Do you know if third-parties such as SANS ISC or ShadowServer take lists of IPs? Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of srn.na...@prgmr.com Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 12:57 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Reporting DDOS reflection attacks

RE: DDOS, IDS, RTBH, and Rate limiting

Here's a thought-provoking video on what Brocade has done with its SDN software load on the MLX: http://vimeo.com/87476840 (demo at ~15 minute mark) I've written it before: if there was a software feature in routers where I could specify the maximum rate any prefix size (up to /32) could receive,

RE: DDOS, IDS, RTBH, and Rate limiting

. Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Roland Dobbins Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2014 8:28 PM To: NANOG Subject: Re: DDOS, IDS, RTBH, and Rate limiting On 9 Nov 2014, at 8:59, Frank Bulk wrote: I've written it before

RE: DDOS, IDS, RTBH, and Rate limiting

Dobbins; NANOG Subject: Re: DDOS, IDS, RTBH, and Rate limiting On 11/8/14 6:28 PM, Roland Dobbins wrote: On 9 Nov 2014, at 8:59, Frank Bulk wrote: I've written it before: if there was a software feature in routers where I could specify the maximum rate any prefix size (up to /32) could

RE: Industry standard bandwidth guarantee?

We get this with wireless carriers -- they ask for quote for a 100 Mbps Ethernet circuit, and then tell us afterwards that it's 100 Mbps of goodput, so we have to size it to 125 Mbps to cover all their one MPLS and two 802.1Q tags and to past the RFC 2544 test at 64-byte frames. Frank

RE: Keeping Track of Data Usage in GB Per Port

For GPON and Ethernet it's just SNMP counters. Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Colton Conor Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 5:35 PM To: Livingood, Jason Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: Keeping Track of Data Usage in GB Per Port So it looks like

RE: IP Geolocation Issue

I would suggest starting with this form: https://www.maxmind.com/en/correction More here: http://nanog.peeringdb.com/index.php/GeoIP Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jose Damian Cantu Davila Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 5:18 PM

RE: Optical Transport Platform

Are you looking for P-OTS or just xWDM? If the first you may want to look at Cyan, which is what we use. Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth McRae Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 2:59 PM To: NANOG Subject: Optical Transport Platform

RE: Is LinkedIn down?

Stuart, You don't tell us if it's www.linkedin.com or linkedin.com, but in any case, because they serve up that site around the world using some form of GLB it may resolve to different IP depending on where you are. From my perspective it is working via Cogent, and I can hit 108.174.2.129, too:

RE: Is LinkedIn down?

Stuart, You haven't shared your IPs but you could go to Level3's Washington Looking Glass and see if you can trace back to your UK and Frankfurt IPs. Frank From: stuart clark [mailto:stuartecl...@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 11:45 AM To: Frank Bulk; nanog@nanog.org

RE: PlayStation network

Anything related at all to this? http://www.product-reviews.net/2014/08/16/time-warner-cable-outage-linked-to-psn-issues/ The solution that's suggested is to point to Google's DNS servers. I wish there were more technical details. Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG

RE: Cable Company Network Upgrade

Thanks for sharing Ben, that's 450 kbps/sub at peak times! We see numbers in our network closer to 300 kbps per subscriber. Assuming peak usage levels of 450 kbs/sub, that would be 15.75 Gbps for Toney's customer base, and possibly more if they really have a 240 Mbps offerings. But if

RE: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix

A third option is to use a transparent caching box, so it caches what's seen. At $20/Mbps I suspect all the popular vendors would find three year or less ROI. Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Todd Lyons Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 12:17

RE: MACsec SFP

DIP switches? Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Saku Ytti Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 3:21 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: MACsec SFP On (2014-06-24 09:59 +0200), Pieter Hulshoff wrote: Hi Pieter, I've seen this request from

RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion

. =) Frank -Original Message- From: George, Wes [mailto:wesley.geo...@twcable.com] Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2014 4:58 PM To: Frank Bulk Cc: NANOG; Donley, Chris (Cable Labs) Subject: Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion On 6/21/14, 3:20 PM, Frank Bulk frnk...@iname.com wrote: Donley said

RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion

Our own fiber access vendor now does have IPv6 support, but I haven't been able to keep it in production because a ~7.8 Mbps traffic IPv6 ND traffic loop (side effect of another bug) knocked out voice services. Turns out that the traffic queue for IPv6 and DHCP (for the ONT's voice services) are

RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion

Did they ever explain why? Did the SMC function as a router, and act as the customer side of a stub network that allowed that /29 to hang off the router? If that was the case, and the Motorola D3 modem was L2-only, that might explain the change in capability. Frank -Original Message-

RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion

. Fessler was chasing down www.att.net, but I've not received an update on this (BCCing him this message). Frank -Original Message- From: Lee Howard [mailto:l...@asgard.org] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 7:54 AM To: Frank Bulk; 'Jared Mauch' Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: Ars Technica on IPv4

RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion

I'm looking for a new consumer router to offer our customers that has GigE ports and supports IEEE 802.11ac, and all the products that our reseller and their partners have suggested don't have IPv6 Ready certification or the vendor can't confirm they meet RIPE's 554 document. D-Link has a long

RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion

These sites used to be dual-stacked: www.cablelabs.com (over 180 days ago via ipv6.cablelabs.com) www.att.net (over 44 days ago) www.charter.com (over 151 days) www.globalcrossing.com (over 802 days) www.timewarnercable.com (over 593 days) and www.t-online.de has been broken for over 33 days.

RE: CMTS/Public Wifi provisioning question

Interesting, I may need to open a ticket with Moto to ask how that’s done. Frank From: Scott Helms [mailto:khe...@zcorum.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 7:58 AM To: Frank Bulk Cc: Jay Ashworth; NANOG Subject: Re: CMTS/Public Wifi provisioning question From talking to folks involved

RE: CMTS/Public Wifi provisioning question

] On Behalf Of Jay Ashworth Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 9:01 AM To: NANOG Subject: CMTS/Public Wifi provisioning question I expect Frank Bulk to have an opinion on this, all others welcome. Hat tip to Bright House -- I've noticed lately that I don't have to go through their captive portal when

RE: FTTH ONTs and routers

FYI, Calix has GPON support for the 836GE ONT on the E7 today, and it will be supported in GPON mode in Release 9.0 on the C7. Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Pete@TCC Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 11:15 AM To: Jean-Francois Mezei;

RE: FTTH ONTs and routers

Calix's indoor ONT (836GE) come with RG functionality by default: http://www.calix.com/systems/p-series/calix_residential_services_gateways.html but they also have a software load for their 700GE-series ONTs: http://www.calix.com/news/press_releases/press_release_20130611.html Frank

RE: CLEC and FTTP H.248/Megaco

We use H.248 in our CLEC area. The voice service for that ONT runs on a specified VLAN for that ONT, so if we had to share our infrastructure with other CLECs we could do that. Frank -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois Mezei Sent:

RE: [[Infowarrior] - NSA Said to Have Used Heartbleed Bug for Years]

I'm not sure if anyone of you has access to those automated tools, but I'd be interested in learning if any of them do catch the bug. Frank -Original Message- From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 7:50 PM To: Matt Palmer Cc:

RE: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: Heartbleed

If we would front our HTTPS services with a (OpenSSL vulnerable) load-balancer that does the SSL work and we just use HTTP to the service, will that mitigate information loss that's possible with this exploit? Or will the OpenSSL code on the load-balancer also store or cache content? Frank

RE: BGPMON Alert Questions

I received a similar notification about one of our prefixes also a few minutes ago. I couldn't find a looking glass for AS4761 or AS4651. But I also couldn't hit the websites for either AS, either. Frank -Original Message- From: Joseph Jenkins [mailto:j...@breathe-underwater.com]

RE: BGPMON Alert Questions

bgpmon has tweeted that We're currently observing a large hijack event. Indosat AS4761 originating many prefixes not assigned to them. Let's hope that AS4651 can quickly apply filters. Frank -Original Message- From: David Hubbard [mailto:dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: Just wondering

At the bottom of one of their pages it says this: If you would like us to not scan your network, please let us know and we will remove your networks from the scan. Likewise, if you have anymore questions please feel free to send us an email at: dnsscan [at] shadowserver [dot]

RE: Level 3 blames Internet slowdowns on Technica

And MSOs, wireless carriers, and satellite providers aren't competitors to RLECs? Frank -Original Message- From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 9:05 PM To: Frank Bulk Cc: Naslund, Steve; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Level 3 blames Internet slowdowns

RE: Level 3 blames Internet slowdowns on Technica

Not sure which rural LECs are exempt from competition. Some areas are effectively exempt from facilities-based (i.e. wireline) competition because it's unaffordable, without subsidy, to build a duplicate wireline infrastructure. There are also wireless carriers and WISPs the compete against

RE: Level 3 blames Internet slowdowns on Technica

Message- From: Naslund, Steve [mailto:snasl...@medline.com] Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 10:16 PM To: Frank Bulk Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Level 3 blames Internet slowdowns on Technica Many rural LECs are not required to provide unbundled network elements. As a network provider you can

  1   2   3   4   5   >