* nanog@nanog.org (Dennis Burgess via NANOG) [Fri 15 Mar 2024, 16:26 CET]:
So have *.app.linktechs.net that I have been trying to get to work,
we have DNSSEC on this, and its failing, but cannot for the life of
me understand why. I think it may have something to do with proving
it exists as a
* shan...@more.net (Spurling, Shannon) [Mon 12 Feb 2024, 20:06 CET]:
Anyone out there who has to run an whois or rWhois service know of a
currently maintained server package or option?
https://github.com/irrdnet/irrd4
-- Niels.
* b...@herrin.us (William Herrin) [Tue 23 Jan 2024, 21:02 CET]:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:45 AM Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
The catch to all of that, however, is that he’s not directly
peered with 3356 and many AS operators strip communities.
And even if I didn't, the problem isn't just
* nanog@nanog.org (Owen DeLong via NANOG) [Tue 23 Jan 2024, 20:47 CET]:
The catch to all of that, however, is that he’s not directly peered
with 3356 and many AS operators strip communities.
Are there recent statistics on that last assertion?
-- Niels.
* b...@herrin.us (William Herrin) [Mon 22 Jan 2024, 15:05 CET]:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 5:24 AM Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Standard practice is to localpref your customers up, which makes
prepends irrelevant. Why would anyone expect different behavior?
It gives me, your paying customer, less
* ayc...@avinta.com (Abraham Y. Chen) [Sat 13 Jan 2024, 18:16 CET]:
0) Your sender name is in an unusual format. It becomes just the
generic NANOG address as the recipient for me to MSG send to.
Your numbered lists are 0-indexed. So clever! Also, your MUA
seems to understand
* ayc...@avinta.com (Abraham Y. Chen) [Fri 12 Jan 2024, 13:09 CET]:
EzIP proposes that 240/4 be used like 10.64/10 in CG-NAT. which is
reusable for each isolated geographical area. Thus, there is no
"Burn-rate" to talk about.
You have posted this statement like five times now in the past
* aar...@gvtc.com (Aaron Gould) [Thu 16 Nov 2023, 19:04 CET]:
For years I've used an MS Excel spreadsheet to manage my IPv4
addresses. IPv6 is going to be maddening to manage in a
spreadsheet. What does everyone use for their IPv6 address prefix
management and documentation? Are there open
Hi Christopher,
No.
Why would your survey take an additional 6.5 minutes to fill out?
-- Niels.
* ch...@thesysadmin.dev (Christopher Hawker) [Thu 16 Nov 2023, 15:20 CET]:
Hello everyone,
Aftab Siddiqui is currently exploring the possibility of using Route Object
Authorisations
* Shawn L [Mon 13 Nov 2023, 18:12 CET]:
Is anyone else seeing a lot of 'strange' IPSEC traffic?
This mail server running FreeBSD did: (timestamps in CET, UTC+1)
Nov 10 00:58:55 mailserver kernel: ipsec_common_input: no key association found
for SA 77.174.253.13/77b4/50
Nov 10 01:26:09
* Laura Smith [Thu 12 Oct 2023, 19:01 CEST]:
I mean, most (all ?) of the registries still can't be bothered to
validate the information the resource holders post to the
database. Last time I asked, e.g. RIPE about it, they basically
said "not my problem guv" , pointed me to some policy
* gutierr...@westmancom.com (Javier Gutierrez) [Thu 05 Oct 2023, 19:25 CEST]:
I have recently encountered some operational differences at my new
organization that are not what I have been exposed to before, where
the loopback of the core network devices is being set from RFC1918
while on the
* nanog@nanog.org (Owen DeLong via NANOG) [Fri 15 Sep 2023, 19:26 CEST]:
On Sep 15, 2023, at 06:30, Noah wrote:
On Fri, 15 Sept 2023, 15:53 John Curran, wrote:
Indeed, that was a less than ideal situation – but I will note
that the technical advisor was sent away by the Receiver once
the
* m...@beckman.org (Mel Beckman) [Sun 06 Aug 2023, 04:26 CEST]:
if you can eliminate such security problems for $400, I say it’s
cheap at twice the price.
You must be unfamiliar with the prices neutral colocation facilities
charge for roof access.
-- Niels.
* b...@uu3.net (b...@uu3.net) [Sat 22 Jul 2023, 10:24 CEST]:
The only interesting action I ever saw was:
"Shutting down email spam factory"; where some network was depeered
from internet completly. Well done.
(Somehow I cannot find post about that anymore).
AGIS:
* na...@ve4.ca (Glen A. Pearce) [Mon 24 Apr 2023, 17:42 CEST]:
Well, I eventually had a friend open the attachment on his Linux machine
Not necessarily a safe idea:
https://www.welivesecurity.com/2023/04/20/linux-malware-strengthens-links-lazarus-3cx-supply-chain-attack/
(scroll down to
* na...@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) [Tue 04 Apr 2023, 15:06 CEST]:
1) How common is it to have the additional extensions to include
that data for analysis?
pmacct is a commonly used tool to enrich flow data with such
information.
-- Niels.
* charles.li...@camonson.com (Charles Monson) [Mon 27 Mar 2023, 16:31 CEST]:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 9:05 AM Kevin McCormick wrote:
IRR Explorer is showing RPKI-Invalid. Maybe RPKI is causing the issue or there
is an issue with IRR Explorer?
I can put you in touch with your account manager, what's your ASN?
-- Niels.
* pascalma...@gmail.com (Pascal Masha) [Thu 12 Jan 2023, 12:21 CET]:
Hello,
Anyone from Akamai responsible for making decisions on cluster
scaling /refresh here?
Kindly contact me offlist.
Regards
Paschal
* t...@visnetworkrd.com (George Toma) [Tue 27 Sep 2022, 17:14 CEST]:
Jared
I would be also interested in what you said in reply to Dustin
Brooks about Akamai contact as in the past we have experienced
similar problem, and trying to resolve it with the Akamai EdgeScape
support we ran into a
* jcur...@arin.net (John Curran) [Tue 27 Sep 2022, 13:26 CEST]:
Yes: the intent is that an RP validator may ship and use the ARIN TAL by
default.
If that is not clear in the revised RPA, then the RPA agreement will updated
again for clarity.
I feel like you're just gaslighting us at this
* nanog@nanog.org (Owen DeLong via NANOG) [Sun 18 Sep 2022, 19:53 CEST]:
I highly recommend that legacy holders who wish to ensure that their
rights are respected transfer their registrations to RIPE-NCC,
whether they have signed the LRSA or not.
Would you say that in hindsight you would have
* b...@herrin.us (William Herrin) [Fri 16 Sep 2022, 22:58 CEST]:
[..]
* ARIN will not record a transfer of a legacy resource to another
registrant absent ARIN's current approved contracts.
RIPE NCC, however, will facilitate this.
If you as a legacy resource holder in the RIPE NCC service
* br...@2mbit.com (Brie) [Mon 29 Aug 2022, 19:38 CEST]:
On 8/29/22 10:59 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
Uhm, this includes various versions of the intel pro 1000 card...
so that's a TON of gear, to include like lenovo laptops, for
instance. I'd wager that this is super common in the field.
The
* amitch...@isipp.com (Anne Mitchell) [Fri 26 Aug 2022, 20:36 CEST]:
For anyone wanting the document and unable to get it through Pacer,
we have it locally and I'm happy to make it available, just let me
know.
By now it's so widely available that even DuckDuckGo can find it for you.
Not
* volki...@gmail.com (VOLKAN KIRIK) [Thu 11 Aug 2022, 15:52 CEST]:
hello
You're replying to a thread from 2009. Please advise.
-- Niels.
* vic...@jvknet.com (Victor Kuarsingh) [Mon 11 Jul 2022, 17:17 CEST]:
This is the most they can and will say. For liabilities reasons,
specifics are likely not in the cards.
I doubt it. Given that emergency services were impacted you can count
on a proper assessment being made available to a
* ra...@psg.com (Randy Bush) [Sat 18 Jun 2022, 19:39 CEST]:
i have been running irrd for some years. am about to dump that
(virtual) server and move from freebsd to bullseye. is there
anything more modern, and _simpler_, than irrd at which i should
take a look?
What are you running irrd
* m...@mtcc.com (Michael Thomas) [Thu 09 Jun 2022, 22:46 CEST]:
If it's so tiny, why shape it aggressively? Why shouldn't I be able
to burst to whatever is available at the moment? I would think most
users would be happy with that.
As SBC Global's peering policy roughly two decades ago
* m...@beckman.org (Mel Beckman) [Sat 07 May 2022, 18:38 CEST]:
I don’t think copyright can enter into it, by dint of the fact that
registry data, being purely factual and publicly available, cannot
be copyrighted.
I'm not a lawyer nor pretend to be one on the internet but
* d...@prime.gushi.org (Dan Mahoney (Gushi)) [Sun 03 Apr 2022, 00:11 CEST]:
I've been seeing a long thread about why ipv6 adoption isn't there
yet. This is half a "paging someone with clue" post and half a
"...really, guys?" Picard-facepalm post.
I just (earlier this week) had to disable
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 11:21:28AM -0700, Aaron de Bruyn via NANOG wrote:
When I said "yes", he said I needed to disable PoE because it
messes with the Comcast modems and he can see "buildups" in his
graphs that show power is "leaking" to the Comcast modem every 24
hours.
This guy must have
* b...@theworld.com (b...@theworld.com) [Mon 14 Mar 2022, 00:31 CET]:
Personally I'd rather hear from the RIRs regarding the value or not
of making more IPv4 space such as 240/4 available. They're on the
front lines of this.
You've got your policy development process diagram upside down. The
* darkde...@darkdevil.dk (Arne Jensen) [Wed 08 Dec 2021, 15:23 CET]:
To me, that part of it also points towards a broken implementation at
CloudFlare, letting a bogus (insecure) responses take effect anyway.
Or they prefer allowing people to visit websites over punishing
system administrators
* esundb...@nitelusa.com (Erik Sundberg) [Wed 24 Nov 2021, 20:57 CET]:
We are receiving latency complaints to Salesforce, anyone else seeing this?
[...]
dig force.com +short
force.com sends an immediate HTTP redirect to www.force.com. You should
look up that hostname instead, and ideally
* nanog@nanog.org (Jean St-Laurent via NANOG) [Fri 29 Oct 2021, 19:57 CEST]:
The link doesn't work. 404
https://www.ncsc.nl/actueel/nieuws/2021/oktober/29/aanstaande-bekendm
| X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
The posted link works fine here but your MUA mangled it so you'll have
to do some
* mark@tinka.africa (Mark Tinka) [Mon 11 Oct 2021, 17:18 CEST]:
To be fair, Jane + Thatho don't care about video resolution.
I don't think that's being entirely fair. Netflix in plenty places
differentiates its subscriptions based partly on video resolution:
* do...@dougbarton.us (Doug Barton) [Sun 10 Oct 2021, 23:44 CEST]:
First, I'm not saying "should." I'm saying that given the market
economics, having the content providers who use "a lot" of bandwidth
do something to offset those costs to the ISPs might be the
best/least bad option. Whether
* deles...@gmail.com (jim deleskie) [Tue 05 Oct 2021, 19:13 CEST]:
World broke. Crazy $$ per hour down time. Doors open with a fire axe.
Please stop spreading fake news.
https://twitter.com/MikeIsaac/status/1445196576956162050
|need to issue a correction: the team dispatched to the Facebook
Ryan, thanks for sharing your data, it's unfortunate that it was
seemingly misinterpreted by a few souls.
* ryan.lan...@gmail.com (Ryan Landry) [Tue 05 Oct 2021, 17:52 CEST]:
Niels, you are correct about my initial tweet, which I updated in
later tweets to clarify with a hat tip to Will
* telescop...@gmail.com (Lou D) [Tue 05 Oct 2021, 15:12 CEST]:
Facebook stopped announcing the vast majority of their IP space to
the DFZ during this.
People keep repeating this but I don't think it's true.
It's probably based on this tweet:
* jllee9...@gmail.com (John Lee) [Tue 05 Oct 2021, 01:06 CEST]:
I was seeing NXDOMAIN errors, so I wonder if they had a DNS outage
of some sort??
Were you using host(1)? Please don't, and use dig(1) instead. There
were as far as I know at no point NXDOMAINs being returned, but due to
the
* b...@theworld.com (b...@theworld.com) [Tue 05 Oct 2021, 00:01 CEST]:
I only mean a single, simple information page like the "sorry we're
working on it" I saw just before they came back.
Which would subsequently receive the world's FB session cookies.
-- Niels.
* m...@beckman.org (Mel Beckman) [Mon 04 Oct 2021, 18:23 CEST]:
Here’s a screenshot:
[cid:3E071EF9-BBC5-44BF-865D-2EDC36E05C71-L0-001]
Please don't do this on the NANOG list.
-- Niels.
* c...@cmadams.net (Chris Adams) [Sat 25 Sep 2021, 00:17 CEST]:
Which - why do I have to order different part numbers for back to
front airflow? It's just a fan, can't it be made reversible? Seems
like that would be cheaper than stocking alternate part numbers.
The fan is inside the power
* Owen DeLong via NANOG [Wed 08 Sep 2021, 20:35 CEST]:
IPv4 continues to increase in cost. Surely, there is a point where
organizations start to cry uncle.
In most western countries there isn't much growth in the total number
of connections. It's mostly churn between providers. IPv4 addresses
* mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta) [Tue 07 Sep 2021, 18:36
CEST]:
As for well known port, we can specify non-default port numbers
in URLs (I'm not sure whether it works for mailto: or not) or.
in the future, things like DNS SRV RRs should be helpful.
This absolutely doesn't
* bj...@mork.no (Bjørn Mork) [Mon 06 Sep 2021, 15:08 CEST]:
And as demonstrated in this thread: Even the few who still do care
are not willing to pay extra, or sacrifice anything, for IPv6. They
will run off to your competitor as soon as they discover the price
is lower there. Which it will
* bj...@mork.no (Bjørn Mork) [Sun 05 Sep 2021, 18:24 CEST]:
So where does that put us in a decade or two? Which protocol is
optional?
The one that costs money. You can already see this in mobile networks.
-- Niels.
* r...@rkhtech.org (Ryan Hamel) [Sat 04 Sep 2021, 23:04 CEST]:
Not everyone has the luxury of picking their ISP, and the common consumer
doesn't know or care about IPv6. They want Netflix to work and that's it.
We just had a 100+ post thread about Netflix not working because CGNs
were
* war...@kumari.net (Warren Kumari) [Tue 31 Aug 2021, 21:04 CEST]:
So, RFC8805 is great and all, but it sure is annoying that you have to find
webforms for a whole heap-o-geolocation providers, and figure out how to
tell them where your geofeed file lives, etc.
Introducing RFC9092 - "Finding
* rube...@gmail.com (Rubens Kuhl) [Fri 27 Aug 2021, 19:16 CEST]:
But that doesn't prevent the other RIRs issuing those since all TAs
sign 0/0.
Nothing does except common sense
-- Niels.
* rich.comp...@charter.com (Compton, Rich A) [Fri 27 Aug 2021, 18:47 CEST]:
Can't AfriNIC just create ROAs for the prefixes and point them to
AS0? That would pretty much make the prefixes unusable since most
tier 1's are doing ROV now.
I'm not a lawyer but that doesn't strike me as a great
When did PeeringDB turn into a routing (policy) registry?
You should use an IRRdb if you want to write RPSL.
* sa...@cluecentral.net (Sabri Berisha) [Thu 19 Aug 2021, 01:59 CEST]:
The difference is, if you are able to use PeeringDB as a single
source of truth, it is a lot easier to grab the
* sa...@cluecentral.net (Sabri Berisha) [Thu 19 Aug 2021, 00:55 CEST]:
For example, if I were to register my peers (53356 and 136620) and AS5524 would
all of a sudden start to advertise my AS as behind it, you'd be able to flag
that.
I'm confused. When did PeeringDB turn into a routing
* Martijn Schmidt [Wed 04 Aug 2021, 18:01 CEST]:
And it's also nice not to yank the old community in case your
customers still depend on it, even if you do also support the RFC
version as an alias of that one.
Note that 3356:666 is applied on ingress to routes received from
peers. They could
I just noticed (although it appears to have come in version 13.0)
that FreeBSD's "ping" app now defaults to IPv6, i.e., no need for
ping6:
* ra...@psg.com (Randy Bush) [Fri 02 Jul 2021, 18:48 CEST]:
pola breakage. especially fun if you have tools which run on both
sides of the koolaid.
On
* mark@tinka.africa (Mark Tinka) [Fri 02 Jul 2021, 16:02 CEST]:
I just noticed (although it appears to have come in version 13.0) that
FreeBSD's "ping" app now defaults to IPv6, i.e., no need for ping6:
Yes, this broke some of my home network monitoring. Sadly there is no
'ping4' in the
* brian.john...@netgeek.us (Brian Johnson) [Wed 14 Apr 2021, 17:37 CEST]:
Not what I was saying. The demand for virtue-signaling green energy
is not an effective strategy to actually having power available.
The relevant virtue that's signaled with green energy is that its
MWh prices are WAY
* patr...@ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore) [Fri 02 Apr 2021, 01:01 CEST]:
I know first hand that Akamai has explained to large customers the
possible problems with multi-GB updates to millions of users
simultaneously. If the game company does not care, then I do not see
what you expect the CDN
* na...@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) [Thu 01 Apr 2021, 23:17 CEST]:
However, the game publisher queues those requests. I'm meaning
request generically, not a GET request or anything like that. The
game publisher that contracts to the CDNs decides when to fulfill
those requests, in the big
* na...@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) [Thu 01 Apr 2021, 21:51 CEST]:
I'm not sure what kind of time lines are expected or engineered for
now, but it *seems* like its a 12 - 36 hour sprint to push the
content out. If so, push it out to 36 - 72 hours? Adjust accordingly
for however much off I am on
* j...@ddostest.me (Jean St-Laurent) [Thu 01 Apr 2021, 21:41 CEST]:
This would be a good compromises for all.
Slowly deliver the assets few days/weeks ahead.
Excellent compromise except for the people who paid for the game.
Why do they need to spend storage to solve your bandwidth problem?
* nanog@nanog.org (Jean St-Laurent via NANOG) [Thu 01 Apr 2021, 21:03 CEST]:
An artificial roll out penalty somehow? Probably not at the ISP
level, but more at the game level. Well, ISP could also have some
mechanisms to reduce the impact or even Akamai could force a
progressive roll out.
* r...@gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec) [Sat 20 Mar 2021, 14:03 CET]:
2. This is a low-traffic list, so even without appropriate mail client
support it's really not a big deal.
The volume isn't the point, the S:N ratio is. Mails like this thread's
starter are off-topic and reduce the value of the list
* fischerdoug...@gmail.com (Douglas Fischer) [Tue 16 Mar 2021, 11:32 CET]:
And then??
Can this be considered an anti-competitive act?
I think you're asking this on the wrong list. We're network operators,
not lawyers with a specialisation in competitive markets regulation.
--
* h...@interall.co.il (Hank Nussbacher) [Thu 18 Feb 2021, 14:10 CET]:
Is it down?
-Hank
I can access https://bgp.he.net/contact/ just fine from here.
Also, it's 2021, please stop posting in HTML.
-- Niels.
* nanog@nanog.org (Mann, Jason via NANOG) [Wed 17 Feb 2021, 00:44 CET]:
Are their legtimate websites to go to purchase new blocks?
IPv4 is not like Bitcoin, new addresses aren't being mined using
gigantic amounts of electricity at enormous environmental cost.
-- Niels.
* mpet...@netflight.com (Matthew Petach) [Tue 29 Dec 2020, 01:08 CET]:
But as far as the physics goes, the conversion of biomatter into
petrochemicals in the ground is more "renewable" than the conversion
of hydrogen into helium in the sun.
It's not. Where did Mr Metcalf think the energy
* mark.ti...@seacom.com (Mark Tinka) [Sat 26 Dec 2020, 06:48 CET]:
On 12/25/20 23:22, Niels Bakker wrote:
Download times:-
180GB at 100 Mbps: 4 hours
180GB at 1000 Mbps: 23 minutes
For a number of reasons, highly unlikely your console will pull at
1Gbps, but yes, it would certainly pull
* m...@mtcc.com (Michael Thomas) [Fri 25 Dec 2020, 21:18 CET]:
On 12/25/20 11:34 AM, Niels Bakker wrote:
Gigabit speeds are about bursting. Foreground activities like
gaming, making online reservations, streaming won't take more than
that, but anything faster is really nice to have when
* mark.ti...@seacom.com (Mark Tinka) [Fri 25 Dec 2020, 19:11 CET]:
I have a mate up the road who just paid for a 1Gbps FTTH service
because it was the same price as a 100Mbps one. He generally lives
between 900Kbps and 20Mbps.
Gigabit-level FTTH services for the home, I feel, have always been
* matt...@corp.crocker.com (Matthew Crocker) [Fri 11 Dec 2020, 20:27 CET]:
I have many customers that have registered their domains against my
authoritative servers (DNS-AUTH3.CROCKER.COM). I need to move that
machine to a different network/IP address. I’ve made the updates in
my domain
* se...@rollernet.us (Seth Mattinen) [Sun 08 Nov 2020, 18:21 CET]:
I've had 74.118.152.0/21 allocated to me since 2005.
So many IPs in possession for so long, yet so little reverse DNS:
---
$ (for j in `jot 7 2`; do for i in `jot 255`; do host 74.118.15$j.$i; done;
done) | grep -c NXDOMAIN
* nanog@nanog.org (J. Hellenthal via NANOG) [Thu 29 Oct 2020, 15:10 CET]:
[disabling checksum offload]
Wireshark used to in Catalina rack up cksum errors a lot while these were all
at their defaults.
This is completely expected behaviour for outgoing packets.
-- Niels.
* orothsch...@gmail.com (Oliver Rothschild) [Wed 21 Oct 2020, 22:39 CEST]:
For those that have circuit ordering mechanisms in their
environment, what sort of software do you use?
If you're on the implementing side, you may want to take a look at
https://ix-api.net/ to see how the three
* drew.wea...@thenap.com (Drew Weaver) [Thu 07 May 2020, 16:50 CEST]:
I contacted their support and CS but if anyone knows someone at
either organization it appears that the certificate for
downloadcenter.mcafee.com Is invalid.
Has been this way for a while.
It looks like you shouldn't
* ja...@puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch) [Thu 30 Apr 2020, 20:10 CEST]:
(Waits for others to crawl out of the woodwork who were more involved in this
:-)
Half duplex 10baseT ports, man. The collision LEDs never calmed down.
-- Niels.
* xima...@gmail.com (Töma Gavrichenkov) [Fri 24 Jan 2020, 11:49 CET]:
And now for our amusement Akamai can do it *accidentally*.
What do you mean? The CDNs don't publish the games nor do they buy
the games. The people downloading aren't even their customers. The
publishers generally
* wimcl...@gmail.com (William McLendon) [Thu 09 Jan 2020, 20:18 CET]:
thank you all for the rapid feedback and suggestions! since many
have asked for more detail, the specific prefix in question is
168.8.214.0/24.
The previous owner is still announcing 168.8.0.0/14. If you're
shooting
* rod.b...@unitedcablecompany.com (Rod Beck) [Sun 08 Dec 2019, 18:18 CET]:
Last time I spoke with an Akamai engineer many years ago the network was purely
transit. Is that evolving?
https://conference.apnic.net/data/41/ix_100-akamai-apricot2016-23feb2016_1456157526.pdf
Per those slides, PAIX
* mikeboli...@gmail.com (Mike Bolitho) [Wed 13 Nov 2019, 12:05 CET]:
This has gone well beyond out of scope of the NANOG list. Discussing who
watches what kind of content has nothing to do with networking. Can you
guys take the conversation elsewhere?
On the contrary. This discussion informs
* j...@baylink.com (Jay R. Ashworth) [Wed 02 Oct 2019, 23:21 CEST]:
- Original Message -
From: "Niels Bakker"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 1:42:08 PM
Subject: Re: This DNS over HTTP thing
* j...@baylink.com (Jay R. Ashworth) [Wed 02 Oct 2019,
* j...@baylink.com (Jay R. Ashworth) [Wed 02 Oct 2019, 19:30 CEST]:
From: "Livingood, Jason"
What many people dismiss as 'lying' would be typically described as 'complying
with the law' in certain countries. It is unfortunate that operators in
countries with legally-mandated DNS blocks are
* nanog@nanog.org (Damian Menscher via NANOG) [Tue 01 Oct 2019, 23:04 CEST]:
Should be obvious to non-trolls that I was referring to Google
changing the default nameserver *in Chrome*, as obviously Google
doesn't have root access to change it on the host.
Funny because just last week there
https://archive.nanog.org/meetings/nanog40/presentations/BGPcommunities.pdf
Don’t let anyone send you Informational tags, these should only be
set by you, and you should strip them from all BGP neighbors
(customers, transits, peers, etc). Otherwise you have a massive
security problem.
*
* r...@tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) [Sat 10 Aug 2019, 02:26 CEST]:
As far as I am aware, no RIR makes any effort whatsoever to vet
changes to WHOIS records, either for IP blocks or ASNs or ORG
records.
This is hilarious. You should hear the whining from any EU-based
operator who
* bran...@brandonsjames.com (Brandon James) [Mon 05 Aug 2019, 17:17 CEST]:
As a young network engineer (no historic perspective) and only SMB
and enterprise experience. It seems like the intention was to allow
these to be publicly routed, but it would be a nightmare to
implement so it never
* m...@beckman.org (Mel Beckman) [Mon 05 Aug 2019, 17:21 CEST]:
Cloudfare is being foolish, and hypocritical. They freely, for
example, carry the equally offensive content of Antifa. Are they
going to cut them off too?
Finally, a centrist to point out the true culprits of all this violence
* meh...@akcin.net (Mehmet Akcin) [Mon 08 Jul 2019, 02:07 CEST]:
We are a growing ISP in Colombia and Latin America. I am interested
in hearing from others regarding tools and software they recommend
we must have such as LibreNMS, Rancid etc.
You should reach out to Euro-IX if you haven't
* j...@west.net (Jay Hennigan) [Fri 21 Jun 2019, 05:19 CEST]:
On 6/20/19 07:39, David Bass wrote:
What are folks using these days for smaller organizations, that
need to dole out time from an internal source?
If you want to go really cheap and don't value your time, but do
value knowing the
* na...@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) [Wed 19 Jun 2019, 23:19 CEST]:
PeeringDB has categories of ratios to choose from. What has the
community decided is acceptable ratios for each category? It's
fairly trivial for any network to determine what their ratio is
as a number, but not necessarily as a
* jab...@hopcount.ca (Joe Abley) [Wed 19 Jun 2019, 17:24 CEST]:
On 19 Jun 2019, at 10:27, Mike Hammett wrote:
I'm curious as to why someone would want to do this? My interest
is education, not combative.
In previous lives I have had great success simply talking to people
at Akamai about
* m...@beckman.org (Mel Beckman) [Sat 15 Jun 2019, 03:49 CEST]:
Postmaster@ is so widely spammed as to be useless.
Not my experience at all (*knocks wood*). RIPE database contacts,
on the other hand...
-- Niels.
* s...@ottie.org (Scott Christopher) [Sat 01 Jun 2019, 12:04 CEST]:
I wonder if this crap corresponds positively with the price of Bitcoin.
Only speculation (read: market manipulation) by holders of massive
amounts of bitcoin drives the price of cryptocurrencies:
* br...@shout.net (Bryan Holloway) [Sat 01 Jun 2019, 01:54 CEST]:
Anybody else noticed a significant uptick in these e-mails?
When I first saw this thread, I hadn't seen any. A couple days
later, I got my first one. (yay!) Now I'm getting 2-3 a day. (yay?)
Yes. It's pretty annoying. And
* r...@gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec) [Fri 31 May 2019, 16:18 CEST]:
[...]
This is hardly surprising: many of them are spammers-for-hire, many of
them use invasive tracking/spyware, and none of them actually care in
the slightest about privacy or security -- after all, it's not *their*
data, why should
* fergdawgs...@mykolab.com (Paul Ferguson) [Wed 29 May 2019, 18:04 CEST]:
This is apparently (?) part of a wave of spoofed malspams
impersonating messages with ‘weaponized' attachments sent to the
NANOG (North American Network Operators Group) mailing list.
They're not sent to the list,
* sa...@tislabs.com (Sandra Murphy) [Fri 24 May 2019, 00:28 CEST]:
And it arrived oddly coincident with my visit to the cvent
registration page. Any others who had that coincidence?
No, and I've gotten like five by now.
-- Niels.
* na...@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) [Wed 22 May 2019, 14:40 CEST]:
The last time I looked, Esastiflow didn't accept a BGP session to learn ASes.
Has that changed?
You can put pmacct inbetween to alleviate this.
-- Niels.
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
