Re: sigs wanted for a response to the fcc's NOI for faster broadband speeds

Unfortunately from my experience it's usually because the small local ISPs don't have the resources to understand IPv6, and may be using equipment generations old that may not support IPv6. It's the large ISPs that don't want to do it because it would increase their operational costs and require

Re: [nznog] Re: sigs wanted for a response to the fcc's NOI for faster broadband speeds

Is that really an appropriate response for NANOG? On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 1:41 PM Geoffrey Jackson < geoffrey.jack...@protonmail.com> wrote: > Pussy. > > -Original Message- > From: Dave Taht > Sent: 2 December 2023 7:11 AM > To: Shane Ronan > Cc: Tom Mitch

Re: sigs wanted for a response to the fcc's NOI for faster broadband speeds

If you want money from the government to subsidize your network, you'll follow their rules... On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:39 PM Tom Mitchell wrote: > Not sure we need the FCC telling us how to build products or run > networks. Seat belts are life-or-death, but bufferbloat is rarely fatal > ;-)

Re: Zayo woes

Except they've acquired A LOT of companies running C and A LOT of companies running J, you'd think they'd at least have the same process for the similar setups, but they don't. Shane On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:42 AM Matthew Petach wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:19AM Mike Hammett

Re: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls)

oesn't require an elaborate PKI. Who is allowed to use >> what telephone numbers is an administrative issue for the ingress provider >> to police. It's the equivalent to gmail not allowing me to spoof whatever >> email address I want. The FCC could have required that ages ago. >> >>

Re: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls)

quivalent to gmail not allowing me to spoof whatever > email address I want. The FCC could have required that ages ago. > > > Mike > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > Midwest-IX > http://www.midwest-ix.com &g

Re: FCC chairwoman: Fines alone aren't enough (Robocalls)

The issue isn't which 'prefixes' I accept from my customers, but which 'prefixes' I accept from the people I peer with, because it's entirely dynamic and without a doing a database dip on EVERY call, I have to assume that my peer or my peers customer or my peers peer is doing the right thing. I

Re: Rogers Outage Canada

What in depth analysis have you seen? Seems to me, this was a failure in a known maintenance activity, and they simply disconnected the devices under maintenance from the network. Shane On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 5:41 AM Jon Sands wrote: > Given the outage was so bad it was disrupting select E911

Re: Any sign of supply chain returning to normal?

Who are you buying servers from, because I'm going on a year waiting on servers from HPE, and about 6 months on servers from Dell, although that may have to do with the types of NICs I need. I'm told HPE is holding back capacity for some of their large "Government" contracts which have stiff

Re: Copper Termination Blocks

I think you'd be very surprised if you walked into the central offices of MANY of the large LECs. The majority of the wire frames are gone, replaced with fiber, even where the service is delivered as copper to the end user, it's usually served from something fiber fed much closer to the end user.

Re: What do you think about this airline vs 5G brouhaha?

Except that the FAA isn't claiming interference in their LICENSED band, they are claiming interference OUTSIDE their licensed band. You can't squat on a frequency and then expect the licensed users to accommodate you. Shane On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 5:06 PM Mel Beckman wrote: > Shane, > >

Re: private 5G networks?

Sorry, I wasn't sure what you meant by 3rd tier, but yes, we are talking about GAA. The important bit is as I stated is "or that nobody currently is transmitting on" And yes, the CBRS Radio, called a CBSD must be configured ahead of time to making freq grant requests to the SAS. This happens via

Re: private 5G networks?

Please provide details on public transit systems that are controlled via Wifi, I find that very interesting. Shane On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 5:43 PM Baldur Norddahl wrote: > > > tir. 30. nov. 2021 23.19 skrev Tom Beecher : > >> In my view there is no practical difference. The owner has full

Re: private 5G networks?

hould assist you with finding a clean channel and potently > working as a mediator between GAA users but there is no guarantee or > protections. > > This might be helpful. @10:10 this video from google SAS's tech team > talks about this very thing. > > https://www.youtube.com/w

Re: private 5G networks?

:00 PM Michael Thomas wrote: > > On 11/30/21 12:53 PM, Shane Ronan wrote: > > What makes it different is once you've been allocated spectrum, which for > in-building use is almost guaranteed, no one else can use that spectrum, so > it's guaranteed. Unlike Wifi, where any device can

Re: private 5G networks?

: > > On 11/30/21 12:43 PM, Shane Ronan wrote: > > What do you mean 3rd Tier? > > General Authorized Access? Taken from some random site looking it up. > > Mike > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 2:47 PM Michael Thomas wrote: > >> >> On 11/30/21 11:38 A

Re: private 5G networks?

What do you mean 3rd Tier? On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 2:47 PM Michael Thomas wrote: > > On 11/30/21 11:38 AM, Shane Ronan wrote: > > The spectrum is CBRS and there are MANY benefits to 5G over Wifi, > including but not limited to guaranteed spectrum. > > For the 3rd tier I ass

Re: private 5G networks?

gt; > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 2:38 PM Shane Ronan > wrote: > >> The spectrum is CBRS and there are MANY benefits to 5G over Wifi, >> including but not limited to guaranteed spectrum. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 2:29 PM Michael Thomas wrote:

Re: private 5G networks?

The spectrum is CBRS and there are MANY benefits to 5G over Wifi, including but not limited to guaranteed spectrum. On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 2:29 PM Michael Thomas wrote: > https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2021/11/preview-aws-private-5g/ > > Why would somebody want this over wifi?

Re: IPv6 woes - RFC

But in fact with local number portability, you cannot rely on the county code to tell you where to route a telephone call anymore. Which is many calls result in a data dip to provide you the routing information from a central repository. Shane On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 10:07 AM Masataka Ohta <

Re: Can somebody explain these ransomwear attacks?

A lot of the payments for Ransomware come from Insurance Companies under "Business Interruption Insurance". It in fact may be more cost effective to pay the ransom, than to pay for continued business interruption. Of course along with paying the ransom, a full forensic audit of the

Re: OOB management options @ 60 Hudson & 1 Summer

Someone has been spending time at Equinix. On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:01 PM wrote: > > > Ha! “Surprised”? Well, offering OOB for a reasonable price could be a > differentiator for the savvy colo providers, but bean counters say: “Huh? > If customer X wants OOB, they can pay ~$300/mo for a

Re: ASE - 100 Gig Wave

lly, that language was intended to prohibit soliciting business and > not asking for help. I have some hard words to describe like Shane Ronan, > but I will forbear. > > I suggest you cease and desist before this gets ugly. Obviously you are > underemployed. > > Get some work

Re: ASE - 100 Gig Wave

NANOG is not a service for receiving details on cable paths for commercial purposes. Please find somewhere else to collect this information. On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:54 AM Rod Beck wrote: > This cable is tapped out and I need a 100 gig wave from Hong Kong to > Singapore. 3 year term. > >

Re: DPDK and energy efficiency

For use cases where DPDK matters, are you really concerned with power consumption? On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:48 AM Nick Hilliard wrote: > Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote on 23/02/2021 16:03: > > "we found that a poll mode driver (PMD) > > thread accounted for approximately 99.7 percent > >

Re: FCC Announces All Of Puerto Rico To Have Access To High-Speed Broadband Service

quite unbelievable. > > My company does low voltage cabling. We charge more than $100 per drop to > provide CAT6 in a newly constructed office building. It would be impossible > to provide wires to 1.2 million locations across PR for $100/each. > > Brandon > > On Nov 2, 2020,

Re: FCC Announces All Of Puerto Rico To Have Access To High-Speed Broadband Service

Seems you could do something with Wireless much easier, guaranteeing access to speed of +/- 300mbits by using the CBAND spectrum that is coming available. Why run wires to the home at all? On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:22 AM Sean Donelan wrote: > > FCC Announces All Of Puerto Rico To Have Access To

Re: Has virtualization become obsolete in 5G?

Yes they are for 5G core. On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, 11:28 AM Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 5/Aug/20 17:07, Shane Ronan wrote: > > > I think you'd be surprised how much of the 5G Core is containerized > > for both the data and control planes in the next generations providers >

Re: Has virtualization become obsolete in 5G?

I think you'd be surprised how much of the 5G Core is containerized for both the data and control planes in the next generations providers are currently deploying. On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, 11:02 AM Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 5/Aug/20 16:15, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote: > > I was actually

Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election

How do you solve for all the devices that don't have vendor support and will no longer be able to operate? Or are you suggesting we run a third Internet ( IPv4, IPv4+ and IPv6) further segregating the things that can communicate on the Internet. On Wed, May 13, 2020, 6:48 PM Elad Cohen wrote: >

Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election

Elad, How do you expect to get elected when you are attacking the very people who will be voting in the election? Further, it would seem you have very little experience in actually operating large scale networks, network equipment or softwarr. You do realize that a LARGE number of devices on the

Re: Abuse Desks

The standards are perfectly feasible. That doesn't mean people will follow them, however it's much better to say "I ignored your notification because it didn't follow the objective standard" then it is to just say "I ignored your notification because I felt like it" On Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 11:37

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

Because the hospitals don't own the machines and the companies that do, charge the hospital per x-ray. The hospitals moved to this model to reduce their costs during "quiet" periods. And by doing so, put their patients in jeopardy. On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, 2:07 PM Owen DeLong wrote: > > > > On

Re: COVID-19 vs. our Networks

It goes down to county level. On Mon, Mar 16, 2020, 4:48 PM Alexandre Petrescu < alexandre.petre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Le 16/03/2020 à 21:42, sro...@ronan-online.com a écrit : > > https://hgis.uw.edu/virus > > > It does not say by City. I cant find my city, department not even region. > > I

Re: ATT Microcell in Austin, TX

Agreed, specifically talking about small/micro cells. Shane On Tue, Feb 18, 2020, 2:11 PM Jared Mauch wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 02:05:15PM -0500, Shane Ronan wrote: > > I can tell you that most carriers have neither type, at least in the US. > > Most towers can

Re: ATT Microcell in Austin, TX

I can tell you that most carriers have neither type, at least in the US. Shane On Tue, Feb 18, 2020, 1:18 PM Stephen Satchell wrote: > There is power backup and then there is power backup. > > The former is a small power pack (batteries, supercapacitors, whatever) > that will allow the

Re: ATT Microcell in Austin, TX

This is a small cell. They are very common across all of the carriers. It is NOT intended to provide primary coverage for the area. It IS intended to provide additional capacity to the immediate area. Think of the large cell towers as providing blanket coverage, while small cells provide hot

Re: Tell me about AS19111

It's not clear to me that HE having reserved AS numbers in THEIR routing table is actually a problem. These AS numbers are actually reserved for private use. Perhaps they have a customer who wants to do BGP but doesn't want to register their own AS number and is single-homed to HE. In this case,

Re: 5G roadblock: labor

The iPhone 11 does not have a 5G (NR) capable modem. The 3.5Ghz freq support is for the CBRS bands in the US. Support for 5G is not just a freq band support, it requires a chipset/modem capable of support the NR protocol. Shane On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, 11:24 AM Alexandre Petrescu <

Re: 5G roadblock: labor

That's if you can get your fiber into the building. Due to commercial agreements many residential MDUs don't allow competitive carriers. 4G didn't have the bandwidth, but with 5G, they can compete. On Sun, Jan 5, 2020, 4:10 PM Michael Thomas wrote: > > On 1/5/20 1:05 PM, Shane Ronan

Re: 5G roadblock: labor

This may be the case for single family homes, but bringing ftth into MDUs can be very ezpensive, as building want to charge entry fees, etc. Same goes for commercial buildings. 5G fixed wireless allows wireless to be used for the last mile, with the user still taking advantage of WiFi indoors.

Re: 5G roadblock: labor

In locations with high population densities, there is nothing you can do to LTE to provide adequate service. Shane On Fri, Jan 3, 2020, 8:46 AM Mike Hammett wrote: > Obviously if the technology is available, works well, and is reasonably > priced, 5G it up. However, if you're adding small

Re: 5G roadblock: labor

Verizon is already offering fixed access 5G service with unlimited data for $50.00/month in five cities. On Fri, Jan 3, 2020, 3:56 AM Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 1/Jan/20 17:35, Brandon Butterworth wrote: > > > > > If the mobile companies are providing the WiFi routers they can > > control it

Re: 5G roadblock: labor

VoWIFI from your cell phone is essentially the same thing, except your phone has to build a tunnel to the providers EPC via an SGW because of the untrusted connectivity. On Mon, Dec 30, 2019, 7:45 PM Michael Thomas wrote: > > On 12/30/19 4:41 PM, Shane Ronan wrote: > > Look up VoLTE

Re: 5G roadblock: labor

Look up VoLTE. On Mon, Dec 30, 2019, 7:39 PM Michael Thomas wrote: > > On 12/30/19 4:19 PM, Brandon Martin wrote: > > > > I really don't want to go diving down the 3GPP document hole... > > > Yeah, no kidding. It's like acronym soup. I've been trying all afternoon > to figure out vowifi and

Re: 5G roadblock: labor

The reason IoT comes into play with 5G is desification. A 4G base station can support X number of UE (User Equipment - phones, mifis, CatM IoT modems, etc) based on the LTE protocol. 5G allows X times N number of UE's per base station, which will allows the network to support the planned

Re: 5G roadblock: labor

Phones aren't the only devices supported by mobile networks. There are many other devices. My laptop for example has a 4G SIM card, as does my MiFi. Sometimes my phone needs to be used as a hotspot to support multiple devices. All of these are based on current use cases, ignoring use cases that

Re: 5G roadblock: labor

wrote: > > > On 30/Dec/19 16:50, Shane Ronan wrote: > > > > > Also, keep in mind that 10 years ago, you didn't know you would want > > or need 25mbits to your phone, but I'd bet that now you'd have a hard > > time living without it. > > Which you can cert

Re: 5G roadblock: labor

My 4G/LTE works when I go behind > things, miles from the tower, and delivers between 5 and 20 megabits > which is more than enough for anything I'm doing on a mobile device. > > On 12/30/19 3:10 PM, Shane Ronan wrote: > > If you are looking at speed as the only benefit to 5G, yo

Re: 5G roadblock: labor

Verizon has already proven in 5 cities that you can run fiber to the node and provide 1G fixed wireless service to both single and multi family homes. This reduces the fiber cost and the headache of dealing with landlords in MDU's. Also, keep in mind that 10 years ago, you didn't know you would

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

T-Mobile claims they are not accepting any payment from these content providers for inclusion in Binge On. "Onstage today, Legere said any company can apply to join the Binge On program. "Anyone who can meet our technical requirement, we’ll include," he said. "This is not a net neutrality

Re: WiFI on utility poles

> > On 9/10/15 9:09 AM, Shane Ronan wrote: > >> And how do you propose we solve this? >> On Sep 10, 2015 9:06 AM, "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net> wrote: >> >> 5 GHz noise levels affecting people whose primary means of Internet access &g

Re: WiFI on utility poles

And how do you propose we solve this? On Sep 10, 2015 9:06 AM, "Mike Hammett" wrote: > 5 GHz noise levels affecting people whose primary means of Internet access > is via fixed wireless . > > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com >

Re: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector

Roland, While your way may be best practice, sometimes real life gets in the way of best practice. Shane On 9/1/15 1:12 PM, Roland Dobbins wrote: On 2 Sep 2015, at 0:08, Steve Meuse wrote: Your advice is not "one size fits all". Actually, it is. Large backbone networks have DCNs/OOBs,

Re: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector

So in your world, the money always exists for a separate flow telemetry network? On 9/1/15 1:29 PM, Roland Dobbins wrote: On 2 Sep 2015, at 0:18, Niels Bakker wrote: You're just wrong here. Sorry, I'm not. I've seen what happens when flow telemetry is 'squeezed out' by pipe-filling DDoS

Re: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector

It's usually not laziness, it's most often related to cost. On Sep 1, 2015 12:00 PM, "Rod Beck" wrote: > Roland is correct. With the caveat that your Internet customer traffic may > flow over the fibers as your separate management circuits. You should aim > for end

Re: best practice for number of RR

Have you considered a virtual route reflector rather than physical hardware? On Aug 1, 2015 11:39 AM, marco da pieve mdapi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, this is my first time in asking for advices here and I hope not to bother you with this topic (if it has been already covered in the past,

Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion

Dictatorship enabled by consensus == Democratic Republic, Welcome to America! On 7/17/15 12:17 PM, Joe Maimon wrote: Owen DeLong wrote: On Jul 16, 2015, at 15:29 , Joe Maimon jmai...@ttec.com wrote: All I am advocating is that if ever another draft standard comes along to enable people

Re: Overlay broad patent on IPv6?

This is actually a good idea. Roll out an IPV6 only network and only pass out an IPV4 address if it's needed based on actual traffic. On Jul 13, 2015 11:27 AM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote: In article CAP032TteiL3=k= vs-kedgu276fwgxqn1j9jmorlq8sw4xpe...@mail.gmail.com you write:

Re: Hotels/Airports with IPv6

1.1.1.1 is usually a good bet On Jul 10, 2015 6:21 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote: In message 20150710215658.gc23...@puck.nether.net, Jared Mauch writes: On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 07:41:53AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: +1 and you will most probably see about 50% of the traffic being

Re: United Airlines is Down (!) due to network connectivity problems

I think you are over estimating the technical resources at NYSE. On Jul 8, 2015 1:44 PM, Matthew Huff mh...@ox.com wrote: Given that the technical resources at the NYSE are significant and the lengthy duration of the outage, I believe this is more serious than is being reported. OTOH, the fact

Re: Setting Up a Looking Glass

This would be even more AWESOME if you added routing table lookup. On 6/13/15 12:38 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net wrote: What's out there for setting up your own looking glass? I saw lots of lists of dead projects or projects that

Re: eBay is looking for network heavies...

When I was asked the default BGP timers across three different vendor platforms as measure of my networking ability during an interview, I replied saying I'd look them up if needed them. I was told I didn't understand BGP in enough detail, despite being able to describe all the steps of BGP

Shutting Down a Network and Selling off Assets

or offers. Shane Ronan

Re: Shutting Down a Network and Selling off Assets

www.ronan-online.com/forsale.html On Mar 21, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Shane Ronan wrote: Hello everyone, This might be slightly off topic, but I am shutting down a large network, and selling off the assets. Information is @ www.ronan-online/forsale.html I will be adding items to the list

Re: 1.0.0.0/8 route from MERIT ?

I am seeing the same thing: 1.0.0.0/8 *[BGP/170] 3d 13:48:10, MED 0, localpref 100, from 206.223.138.126 AS path: 3549 7018 237 I On Feb 24, 2010, at 2:13 PM, Alex H. Ryu wrote: Today I jumped into one of our routers, and I found that 1.0.0.0/8 is announced

Re: Email Portability Approved by Knesset Committee

When in Tokyo, always have a MAP showing where you want to go. On Feb 23, 2010, at 11:34 AM, N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote: Larry Sheldon wrote (on Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:28:03AM -0600): On 2/23/2010 4:39 AM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: Maybe politicians should just keep their nose out of things that

Re: Data Center recommendations

Equinix On Feb 9, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Lunch Hound wrote: Hi, Who do you like for data centers these days? Looking for a site more than 1000 miles from Chicago. Thanks!

Re: Patents, IETF and Network Operators

The real question is why Patent something? The reality is even if you patent any idea/feature, other vendors will come out with a similar (although not patent infringing) version of the same idea/feature. While you might get a short term jump on other vendors, if the idea is really good,

Re: Restrictions on Ethernet L2 circuits?

(now defunct) Yipes! NAN (National Area Network) product They don't offer this anymore?

Re: Restrictions on Ethernet L2 circuits?

Yipes is still offering services under the Yipes, name, at least in the NY Metro Area. On Dec 31, 2009, at 3:32 PM, George Bonser wrote: -Original Message- From: Shane Ronan Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 12:24 PM Subject: Re: Restrictions on Ethernet L2 circuits? (now

Re: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc.

I'm not an expert, but can/should you advertise ARIN IP space on APNIC or RIPE, etc ? You are talking about having recieved ip space from ARIN, tied to an ARIN AS I suppose it's probably more a matter of form than anything else though. This happens all the time with IPv4 space and AS

Re: Breaking the internet (hotels, guestnet style)

Juniper SSL VPN FTW! On Dec 7, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote: On Dec 7, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: On Dec 7, 2009, at 5:29 PM, John Levine wrote: Will be interesting to see if ISPs respond to a large scale thing like this taking hold by blocking UDP/TCP 53 like

Re: Happy Thanksgiving

Sent from my Blackberry. Please execute spelling errors. - Original Message - From: Shane Ronan sro...@fattoc.com To: nanog na...@merit.edu Sent: Thu Nov 26 13:38:43 2009 Subject: Happy Thanksgiving Happy Thanksgiving eom

Re: Ethernet over DS3 Converters

I've been using the RAD products for years. The price is right and they are extremely reliable. On Nov 23, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Brad Fleming wrote: Hello all, My company is searching for some Ethernet over DS3 converters / adaptors for a specific installation. I see several options from

Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR

Disagree, the EX is a very capable L3 router for LANs. On Nov 13, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Cord MacLeod wrote: On Nov 13, 2009, at 4:14 AM, Matthew Walster wrote: 2009/11/12 David Coulson da...@davidcoulson.net You could route /32s within your L3 environment, or maybe even leverage something

Re: DreamHost admin contacts

Agreed -1 for GroupSpark (AKA 123together) On Oct 13, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Jeff Saxe wrote: Barring that, what recommendations might the NANOG community have for an extremely rock-solid e-mail hosting company? I realize that may mean self-promotion, but hey, bring it on. Some people, when they

Re: Data Centers in England

As the CTO of a financial company with multiple data centers in London, I would recommend Equinix Slough (or London 4) site. They have a website setup just for Financial firms. http://financial.equinix.com/ I've got space in both Telehouse and Equinix and would recommend Equinix for

Re: SMS

On that same note, can someone point me in the direction of an SMS gateway service? I would like to be able to send SMS messages from my monitoring systems, but I am unsure about how to go about it. Appreciate the assistance. Shane Ronan On Sep 22, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Express Web Systems

Re: SMS

How do I send out an email if the network is down? On Sep 22, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: Shane Ronan wrote: On that same note, can someone point me in the direction of an SMS gateway service? I would like to be able to send SMS messages from my monitoring systems, but I am

Re: Datacenter recommendations - China and Latin America

I'd recommend Equinix which has a site in Hong Kong which I would recommend over mainland China. http://www.equinix.com/locations/map/asiapacific/hongkong/ Shane On Sep 8, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Benjamin Billon wrote: For Asia, I'd say Hong Kong (and personnaly Mega iAdvantage). Could be

Re: Link capacity upgrade threshold

What system were you using to monitor link usage? Shane On Aug 30, 2009, at 8:26 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: On 30/08/2009 13:04, Randy Bush wrote: the normal snmp and other averaging methods *really* miss the bursts. Definitely. For fun and giggles, I recently turned on 30 second polling

Re: Level 3 (was: legacy Wiltel/Looking Glass bandwidth)

I could not agree with the points below more. Prior to the mergers, I had multiple services each with Looking Glass, Wiltel and Broadwing and Level3. After Level3's round of acquisitions the service level for all four of them went way down. I've had the experience of not being able to

Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds?

In my experience they are required not only to mark the line, but to identify it with the initials of the owner. On Jun 2, 2009, at 10:44 AM, JC Dill wrote: Elmar K. Bins wrote: jcdill.li...@gmail.com (JC Dill) wrote: Why do they watch and monitor rather than proactively go out and say

Re: ISP best practices

I learned DNS initially by reading some great documents by Avi Freedman, they are a little out dated, but still very relevant and posted on his website @ http://www.freedman.net/ On May 21, 2009, at 9:38 AM, Philip Lavine wrote: To all, I am sure this has been asked 10 to the 1

Re: ISP best practices

Apologies, this should have said I learned BGP initially not DNS. Sorry!! On May 21, 2009, at 4:38 PM, Shane Ronan wrote: I learned DNS initially by reading some great documents by Avi Freedman, they are a little out dated, but still very relevant and posted on his website @ http

Re: ISP best practices

I have to agree. I've been working with BIND for over 10 years, and still use webmin to help me keep things organized. On May 21, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Justin Wilson - MTIN wrote: We have several clients using Webmin. If you don’t know command line Webmin is another tool to help you

Re: Beware surfers: cyberspace is filling up

I think it depends on the industry you are in, in the financial industry, no one uses MPLS clouds or VPN's over the Internet, everyone uses either 1G or 10G links. On Apr 30, 2009, at 6:57 PM, Jack Bates wrote: Stefan wrote: hmmm ...

Re: Config Backup / Inventory

Sounds like rancid par to me. :-) Par?

Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re impacting revenue]

will simply sign off on what they IT staff tells them (as they have little to no understanding of the situation), can you explain what exactly you are hoping to achieve by heaping on yet an additional requirement to the already over burdensome process of receiving an IPv4 allocation? Shane

Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re impacting revenue]

You really should go ask a CEO if he'd sign off on something that he doesn't understand. Really. I can assure you that your impression is wrong, and most CEOs don't prefer to be standing in court defending their actions. Actually, being a CTO of a company, I know that my CEO signs things

Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re impacting revenue]

Not the annual report, the actual books and records, including details on individual expenses. On Apr 21, 2009, at 2:54 PM, Kevin Loch wrote: Shane Ronan wrote: C) Are ARIN's books open for public inspection? If so, it might be interesting for the group to see where all our money is going

Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re impacting revenue]

On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: Well... ARIN is structured with a bottom-up community driven policy process. That has served us well for many years, and, I think that changing it would be a mistake. However, in this case, that means that the following people are

The real issue

Is ARIN, who won't even take back large blocks of space from people who have long ago stopped using it and aren't paying anything for it, prepared to start filing civil suits against people who were assigned / 24's (and paid for them) due to inaccurate declaration?

Re: The real issue

It's means one of two things: 1) Recoup the unused space for paid reallocation or 2) Have the current owner pay the market rate for the IP space On Apr 21, 2009, at 7:37 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Shane Ronan sro...@fattoc.com wrote: Is ARIN, who won't

RE: The real issue

list Subject: Re: The real issue Shane Ronan wrote: Very simple, just do it. Ha! We have some legacy IP space in continous use here at ASN13345 for over 12 years now that was recently revoked for a few weeks (only to be later restored via a transfer once the exact definition of ownership

RE: The real issue

No, but they can sure send them a bill and then go after them for collections when they don't pay it. -Original Message- From: christopher.mor...@gmail.com [mailto:christopher.mor...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 8:34 PM To: Shane Ronan Cc

Re: The real issue

'not my customer, not my issue, you REALLY need to talk to ASX who's their provider...' -Chris I don't believe this is how most ISP's would respond or there wouldn't be RBLs. On Apr 21, 2009, at 9:38 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Shane Ronan sro

Re: The real issue

Simple, send it to the address and contact listed in their whois record. On Apr 21, 2009, at 9:40 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: where do you send the bill? For some even large organizations I've seen bills get shuffled to random places that didn't deal with 'bills' and then get dropped. Not

Re: The real issue

But you are okay with them raising your fees to go to court left and right to enforce the declarations made by CEO's of companies who are happily paying the fees for the space they've been assigned. On Apr 21, 2009, at 9:43 PM, Jack Bates wrote: 1) I don't care to pay higher member fees

  1   2   >