Re: 10 years from now... (was: internet futures)

Greetings, * Javier J (jav...@advancedmachines.us) wrote: > Since FiOS still doesn't do ipv6 (I don't bother checking anymore) I've > used tunnelbroker since I was stuck on Comcast. Called last week and, no, FiOS *still* doesn't do ipv6. Seriously ridiculous. > I'm not running BGP since that's

Re: Verizon DC/NOVA Issues?

Seems to be clearing and back here in NoVA for me. * Andy Ringsmuth (a...@andyring.com) wrote: > https://twitter.com/VerizonSupport/status/1354109889572982786 > > Verizon reporting a fiber cut in Brooklyn. > > > Andy Ringsmuth > 5609 Harding Drive > Lincoln, NE 68521-5831 > (402) 304-0083

AS2828 XO / Verizon Route Flapping?

Greetings, We're seeing a pretty consistent drop of traffic every 60s for about 5s inside of AS2828 (formerly xo.net, now Verizon). Started seeing alerts due to this at Sun, 06 Sep 2020 06:04:04 +. During the 5s we're getting 'No route to host' bounces, eg: connect to address

Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS

Greetings, * Mike Hammett (na...@ics-il.net) wrote: > How have we gone this long of a conversation without someone from FIOS > stepping in and setting the record straight? How have we gone this long without ipv6 on FIOS ...? (though I've heard that it may have shown up in some places, I'm

Re: CenturyLink/Level3 feedback

Since there was a comment on this again, I figure I'll provide an update ('just' the facts...)- it's now been two more weeks with no evidence of any progress being made, the equipment's been just sitting there, with CL going a week without providing any update until prodded and then it was "let me

Re: CenturyLink/Level3 feedback

n Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 12:11 PM Stephen Frost wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > I have to admit that I was hoping to be able to report to this list that > > CL was able to spin up a new 1G in fairly short order (after all, this > > is what they assured me of when dis

Re: CenturyLink/Level3 feedback

Greetings, I have to admit that I was hoping to be able to report to this list that CL was able to spin up a new 1G in fairly short order (after all, this is what they assured me of when discussing it with them...) but it's now been over a month, with them telling me it'll be another couple weeks

Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM

Greetings, * William Herrin (b...@herrin.us) wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > > > For those who operate public facing SMTPd that receive a large volume of > > incoming traffic, and accordingly, a lot of spam... > > > > How much weight do you

Re: Purchased IPv4 Woes

Chuck, * Chuck Church (chuckchu...@gmail.com) wrote: > Maybe a silly idea, but shouldn't the sale of a block of addresses (RIR > ownership change) trigger a removal of that block from all reputation list > databases? If I buy a car from a police auction, I'm fairly sure the FBI > doesn't

Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

Owne, * Owen DeLong (o...@delong.com) wrote: > However, my home address has been published in multiple whois databases since > I moved here in 1993. > > Not once has a nitwit with a gun shown up on my doorstep as a result. (I have > had visits from nitwits with guns, > but they were the

Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun

* William Herrin (b...@herrin.us) wrote: > Guys, that would be an important distinction if Cogent were providing > Dennis with free service. They're not. Regardless of what Google does > or doesn't do, Dennis pays Cogent to connect him to the wide Internet > which emphatically includes Google. I'm

Re: Galaxy S6 is IPv6 on all US National Mobile carriers

* Jared Mauch (ja...@puck.nether.net) wrote: For those wondering, nearly 62% of VZ Wireless traffic is IPv6. http://www.worldipv6launch.org/measurements/ I'm still wondering when they're going to teach the Verizon FIOS people about the IPv6 goodness... Thanks,

Re: FCC form 477 geocoding

* Jay Hennigan (j...@west.net) wrote: The CFO here is working on FCC form 477 and tells me that he needs to enter census tract and block information for our customers. He says that the US Census site is worse than useless and the info isn't on the FCC site. The US Census Tiger data set is

Comcast IPv6 issues..?

Hey all, Getting delays and seeing some pretty funky routes inside Comcast. All traces start from Ashburn, VA (2001:4830:167b::) and go to Chicago, IL (2610:150:4b0f::). Coming from Occaid/SIXXS (over a tunnel) through HE.net and have seen: Ashburn - San Jose - New York - Chicago -

Re: Comcast IPv6 issues..?

* Steve Meuse (sme...@mara.org) wrote: It's likely a reverse DNS error. If you look at the latency, it's within range of the previous hops. Still curious that the systems (IPv6 addresses) are changing too.. It's not like it's the same route but just different rDNS results. It's also quite a

Re: [[Infowarrior] - NSA Said to Have Used Heartbleed Bug for Years]

* Niels Bakker (niels=na...@bakker.net) wrote: but here's the same news from a much more credible source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-04-11/nsa-said-to-have-used-heartbleed-bug-exposing-consumers.html Still anonymously sourced but at least via people whose ability to vet sources

Re: Verizon FIOS IPv6?

I echo the 'good luck' and ditto on the experience. There's a lot of people anxious to get IPv6 on FIOS, but there seems to be precious little movement over there. * David Hubbard (dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com) wrote: Good luck. We've been bitching at our sales rep for years, as we've added

Re: Verizon FIOS IPv6?

* Christopher Morrow (morrowc.li...@gmail.com) wrote: On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote: There's a lot of people anxious to get IPv6 on FIOS, but there seems to be precious little movement over there. it really is just an embarrassment :( Oh, I agree

Re: congestion between Cogent and CenturyLink

* Paul S. (cont...@winterei.se) wrote: +1, which semi-large eyeball does Cogent NOT have capacity problems to? Soon, Comcast... Given what's going on w/ them and Netflix. Thanks, Stephen signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: BCP38.info

David, * David Miller (dmil...@tiggee.com) wrote: On Jan 28, 2014, at 1:50 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: Hang on Jared, I'm trying to wrap my head around this. You're saying that AS7922 has over 50K IP addresses which, if you send a DNS query to that IP, you get an answer back from

Re: Verizon FIOS IPv6?

* Geert Bosch (bo...@adacore.com) wrote: On Jan 8, 2014, at 17:03, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote: I have a tunnel through HE and it is solid. [...] --- .gnat.com ping6 statistics --- 20 packets transmitted, 20 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip

Re: Verizon FIOS IPv6?

* valdis.kletni...@vt.edu (valdis.kletni...@vt.edu) wrote: On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 08:41:30 -0500, Stephen Frost said: I'm really curious how *that* is working out. My IPv6 tunnel is only a ms or two slower than IPv4 (and it's all sub-15ms), but there is something very odd if the tunnel

Re: Verizon FIOS IPv6?

* Christopher Morrow (morrowc.li...@gmail.com) wrote: On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Adam Rothschild a...@latency.net wrote: I've heard of folk in and around the NYC metro getting set up for v6 by escalating through their commercial account teams, or the field 'commercial account teams'

Re: iOS 7 update traffic

* Ben (ben+na...@list-subs.com) wrote: No need for you to bash Apple in this instance. What this conversation badly needs is a sub-thread about whatever happened to the technical solutions which would address this issue (eg: mbone). Of course, I know what happened and what the issues are there,

Re: Friday Hosing

* Alex Rubenstein (a...@corp.nac.net) wrote: Ohh we had some of those at JVNCNet, a real piece of crap. Wow. JVNCnet. Haven't heard that name in a long, long time. RIP Sir Alec Guinness. Stephen signature.asc Description: Digital signature

whois.internic.net / whois.crsnic.net IPv6 timeouts

All, Don't know if it'll help or if this is simply old news to most, but the whois systems (whois.internic.net/whois.crsnic.net) have records and happily answer TCP/43 requests w/ the usual blurb, but all the servers I've hit then fail to actually provide data and instead the whois

Re: whois.internic.net / whois.crsnic.net IPv6 timeouts

* Robert L Mathews (li...@tigertech.com) wrote: These work for me on multiple IPv6 carriers, using both the Mac OS X and Debian squeeze whois clients: Interesting.. Perhaps your WHOIS client is choking on the first type of response without the =? WHOIS should work fine via telnet to

Re: whois.internic.net / whois.crsnic.net IPv6 timeouts

* John Levine (jo...@iecc.com) wrote: It works fine for me. Very curious. I've had problems before and would guess that it's a routing issue. It my impression that they're anycasted. traceroute6's take me to various places, so I think it may just be a simply DNS round-robin rather than

Re: It's the end of the world as we know it -- REM

* Justin M. Streiner (strei...@cluebyfour.org) wrote: On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: http://www22.verizon.com/Support/Residential/Internet/HighSpeed/General+Support/Top+Questions/QuestionsOne/ATLAS8742.htm One minor typo in this one, that I've emailed Verizon's webmasters