On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:55:52 -0600
Brandon Galbraith brandon.galbra...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes good enough perfect
Never know what is going to come along to turn your addressing plan on its
head.
It seems to me that what this really is about is trying to be in the
best position in
That's why we have the safety valve...
2000::/3 is the total address space being issued currently.
So, if we discover that there aren't enough /64s like we currently
think there are, then, before we start issuing from 4000::/3, we
can have a new address plan for that address space while leaving
On 1/23/2010 9:47 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
64 bits is enough networks that if each network was an almond MM,
you would be able to fill all of the great lakes with MMs before you
ran out of /64s.
Did somebody once say something like that about Class C addresses?
The number of /24s in all of
In a message written on Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:52:21PM +0100, Mathias Seiler
wrote:
I use a /126 if possible but have also configured one /64 just for the link
between two routers. This works great but when I think that I'm wasting 2^64
- 2 addresses here it feels plain wrong.
So what do
101 - 104 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
