: anyone use fbtracert successfully?
Thank you!! Some of those tools are proving much more useful for me than
fbtracert. (In particular, traceflow has been updated recently enough that it
“just works” in common environments that have Python3. And while it may not be
perfect, it’s good enough
.ca>
www.merlin.mb.ca<http://www.merlin.mb.ca/>
From: Hugo Slabbert
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 10:39 AM
To: Thomas Scott
Cc: Adam Thompson ; nanog
Subject: Re: anyone use fbtracert successfully?
What about some other options?
https://paris-traceroute.net/
https://dublin-tracerout
What about some other options?
https://paris-traceroute.net/
https://dublin-traceroute.net/
https://github.com/rucarrol/traceflow
--
Hugo Slabbert
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 9:54 AM Thomas Scott
wrote:
> Ha, my apologies, I thought I was writing this for a Linux User Group, not
> a NOG. Ignore
Ha, my apologies, I thought I was writing this for a Linux User Group, not
a NOG. Ignore my simplistic explanations.
- Thomas Scott | mr.thomas.sc...@gmail.com
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 12:47 PM Thomas Scott
wrote:
> I have used it successfully in a test environment that I was using ECMP
> in.
I have used it successfully in a test environment that I was using ECMP in.
Most of the public networks that I've worked with don't use ECMP as often
as other methods for steering traffic (LAGs, BGP MEDs, etc).
What I have seen it fantastically useful for was troubleshooting a transit
provider,
The tool fbtracert (http://github.com/facebookarchive/fbtracert) was mentioned
here recently as a way to get visibility into multi-pathing.
Has anyone here ever used this tool successfully?
Supposedly Facebook uses this tool internally, but… that doesn’t help much.
I’ve tried it on 4 different
6 matches
Mail list logo
