On Oct 4, 2010, at 1:59 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:30:55 PDT, Owen DeLong said:
Removing a few points probably isn't a bad idea so long as you have a list of
domains for which points should be added.
140 million .coms. Throw-away domains. I do believe that
The knowhow for BGP in that environment is all of about 30 minutes worth of
training. They should find a way to get it, IMHO.
Owen
On Oct 4, 2010, at 10:56 PM, Jonathon Exley wrote:
It also scales better from the SP point of view. If you have 1000 L3VPN
services on your PE node using OSPF to
On 4 Oct 2010, at 23:18, Randy Bush wrote:
1) We have not implemented support for this yet. We plan to go live
with the fully hosted version first and extend it with support for
non-hosted systems around Q2/Q3 2011.
this is a significant slip from the 1q11 we were told in prague. care
to
On 04/10/2010 18:24, Heath Jones wrote:
I'm not clever enough to know of some way that you could do optical
regeneration without converting the signal to electrical and
retransmitting back as optical.. How is that done?
Wikipedia has a useful article on this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EDFA
alex, i am not gonna argue with you.
96% of your users will be happy for you to do everything for them,
despite the fact that the wrong holder has the keys (and, as john says,
the liability).
but 96% of your address space, i.e. the large holders, will want to hold
their own keys and talk
Dorn Hetzel dhet...@gmail.com wrote on 10/04/2010 06:22:58 PM:
With regards to the Wired Article, I still have my copy of that issue
and
would consider that article perhaps my favorite magazine article of all
time.
Same here. A classic.
What's that quote again...?
Oh, that's it: The more you know, the more you know you don't.
It feels very appropriate now :)
I was wondering for quite some time if there was a scientific term for that
effect, since many of us seem to run into the opposite quite often. It turns
out that it's
Hi
Anyone can share the Network card experience
ls onborad PCI Expresscard better or Plug in slot PCI Express card good?
How are their performance in Gig transfer rate?
Thank you so much
Heath,
By the way, my recollection is the undersea regenerators do purely optical
regeneration.
There is no O-E conversions undersea, only at the landing stations and
terrestrial components.
I'm not clever enough to know of some way that you could do optical
regeneration without
IMHO, Nothing beats a good intel NIC.
I'm a big fan of the intel pro/1000GT.
In terms of performance, I think it is more determined by the card
chipset.
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(877) 804-3001 x106
From: Deric Kwok deric.kwok2...@gmail.com
Sent:
It depends on the speed of the PCI slot. In saying that, you are only
trying to transfer 1Gb/s.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_Express
Note the thoughts on there about full duplex..
PCI Express 1.0a
In 2003, PCI-SIG introduced PCIe 1.0a, with a data rate of 250 MB/s
and a transfer rate of 2.5
Heya,
I'm trying to quickly pull together some very rough
budget numbers for purchasing a full monitoring
system (network, server, security, facilities). Is
there a source for rough unit costs? If not, does
anyone have recent RFI pricing that they'd be willing
to share?
Eric :0
get a VAR involved, it'll be more efficient and accurate than asking here.
things change weekly.
-g
On Oct 5, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Eric Gauthier wrote:
Heya,
I'm trying to quickly pull together some very rough
budget numbers for purchasing a full monitoring
system (network, server,
On 10/4/10 6:55 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:
The most common situation where another host sends on your domain's
behalf is a forwarding MTA, such as NANOG's mailing list. A lot of MTAs
will only trust that the final MTA handling the message is a source
host. In the case of a mailing list, that's
the question of which is better, onboard vrs plug in would in part be
determined by the type (make/model) of motherboard you are speaking of. How
they have IRQs allocated (which is something you may be able to adjust), where
it is attached to the bus etc… Also, what comes with the main
For 10Gbit we use Intel cards for production service machines, and
ConnextX/Intel in the HPC cluster.
Greg - I've not been exposed to 10G on the server side..
Does the server handle the traffic load well (even with offloading) -
that's a LOT of web requests / app queries per second!
Or are
One would need to know a lot more about the specifics of your requirements.
My suggestion would be to invest money in qualified people to watch over
something like opennms or (my favorite) a combination of alienvault and
opsview.
Eric Gauthier e...@roxanne.org wrote:
Heya,
I'm trying to
Anyone can share the Network card experience
ls onborad PCI Expresscard better or Plug in slot PCI Express card good?
How are their performance in Gig transfer rate?
IMHO, Nothing beats a good intel NIC.
I'm a big fan of the intel pro/1000GT.
In terms of performance, I think it is more
Hi,
most of our traffic is heading directly into memory, not hitting the local
disks, on the HPC end of things. Our file servers are feeding the network
with around 24 x 10Gibit (active/active clusters), and regularly run at over
80 percent on all ports during runs.. this is all HPC /
Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifiers (EDFAs) do not re-shape or re-time the signals
(the last 2 R's in 3R -- re-amplification, re-shaping, and re-timing)
Thanks Chris - even more reading to do :) It's interesting stuff
that's for sure.
This is also pretty cool:
Michael Sinatra, UCB; what are thoughts around best practices for
auth DNS server in ILNP world, and how do you handle updates for
locator values to the auth servers when a link changes?
A: you need
DNSsec to be running, you make updates, you check authenticity of the
update, etc. How will
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Michael Sinatra wrote:
Hence the question: How should I provision authoritative DNS servers,
given that the prefix information is provided via DNS--including the
prefix information for the DNS servers themselves--leading to a
chicken-and-egg problem. In addition, I would
Hey guys,
Anyone knows how often does Level3 update their filters?
I have a prefix in Europe which has a route-obj from Sunday, it's accepted
in Level3 Europe from Monday, but in the US it's still not accepted.
Thanks,
Florin
Normally it's done every night (overnight)... that's been our experience...
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Florin Veres [mailto:flo...@futurefreedom.ro]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 12:42 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Level3 filter updates
Hey guys,
Anyone knows how often does
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Michael Sinatra wrote:
Hence the question: How should I provision authoritative DNS servers,
given that the prefix information is provided via DNS--including the
prefix information for the DNS servers
I was told every 48 hours when I recently dealt with Level3 on a similar
thing about a month ago.
On 10/05/2010 12:50 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
Normally it's done every night (overnight)... that's been our experience...
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Florin Veres
Heath,
I just had a thought about EFDA - please forgive my lack of
terminology though, i'll try to explain:
Say you have signal coming in to EFDA, the signal is just amplified
(as you said, also noise - the whole source signal).
Would it be possible to extract via PLL or similar the source
Notes from NANOG50 day 2 (Tuesday) morning session are
now posted at
http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2010.10.05-NANOG50-morning-notes.txt
Again, apologies for misspelled names, typos, etc. I'm dashing to
lunch now, but can fix things when I get back. ^_^;;
Matt
Would it be possible to extract via PLL or similar the source clock
and use that to modulate the amplifier power?
Although you can amplify just a single wavelength with an EDFA (has to be in
the 1550nm range, not 1310nm), most deployments are using EDFAs in a DWDM
environment. The C-band
Level 3 updates their filters every night. I used to work @ level3
On 10/5/10 9:18 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Michael Sinatra wrote:
Hence the question: How should I provision authoritative DNS servers,
given that the prefix information is provided via DNS--including the
prefix information for the DNS servers themselves--leading to a
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Michael Sinatra wrote:
Which then implies that parent zones must use DDNS, and must enable secure
updates from the child (from wherever the child's DDNS updates are sourced).
Yes, well if the authentication can be sorted out this would be much
better than having to mess
On 10/5/2010 2:03 PM, Michael Sinatra wrote:
The issue is how should I deal with the situation that you need to know
the correct L64 record to get to my network (without waiting for a
timeout if you try the broken prefix first) and the way to know what the
correct prefixes are is to query a
I've posted the Tuesday afternoon notes at
http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2010.10.05-NANOG50-afternoon-notes.txt
and now I'm dashing to the social, because they're turning out the lights
on me in the hall here. ^_^;;
Matt
On Oct 5, 2010, at 4:15 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:
I've posted the Tuesday afternoon notes at
http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2010.10.05-NANOG50-afternoon-notes.txt
and now I'm dashing to the social, because they're turning out the lights
on me in the hall here. ^_^;;
Thanks Matt, your notes
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down.
Please confirm in the USA.
~SmithwaySecurity
Sent from my iPhone
Same here in SF Bay Area
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:44 PM, James Smith ja...@smithwaysecurity.comwrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is
down.
Please confirm in the USA.
~SmithwaySecurity
Sent from my iPhone
Down here in Denver CO
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:44 PM, James Smith ja...@smithwaysecurity.comwrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is
down.
Please confirm in the USA.
~SmithwaySecurity
Sent from my iPhone
Hi James,
On 6 okt 2010, at 06:44, James Smith wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down.
Please confirm in the USA.
No reason to panic over here (.nl)
---
Michiel Muhlenbaumer
Atrato IP Networks
On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:44 AM, James Smith wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down.
Please confirm in the USA.
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/facebook.com
looks like it isn't just you ..
Down from here as well. Looks like a productive night of
Ditto In AU and from other reports US.
Guess productivity will go up ;-)
On 06/10/2010, at 15:46, James Smith ja...@smithwaysecurity.com wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down.
Please confirm in the USA.
~SmithwaySecurity
Sent from my
Down , down, down in NYC.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Same here in SF Bay Area
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:44 PM, James Smith ja...@smithwaysecurity.com
wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is
down.
Works fine here, Northern Colorado.
--
Sincerely,
Mikhail Strizhov
mailto:striz...@cs.colostate.edu
On 10/05/2010 10:47 PM, Patrick Muldoon wrote:
On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:44 AM, James Smith wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down.
Please confirm
I think the Outages mailing list is more appropriate for this.
On 10/5/10 9:46 PM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Same here in SF Bay Area
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:44 PM, James Smith ja...@smithwaysecurity.comwrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that
Seems to be working just fine here in Toronto.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Mark Hofman mhof...@shearwater.com.auwrote:
Ditto In AU and from other reports US.
Guess productivity will go up ;-)
On 06/10/2010, at 15:46, James Smith ja...@smithwaysecurity.com wrote:
At 1:20am here in
It's back up. There goes that short burst of productivity.
On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Mark Hofman wrote:
Ditto In AU and from other reports US.
Guess productivity will go up ;-)
On 06/10/2010, at 15:46, James Smith ja...@smithwaysecurity.com
wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Smith wrote:
At 1:20am here in Canada, NB our networks are showing that facebook is down.
Please confirm in the USA.
~SmithwaySecurity
Sent from my iPhone
We need Alert and ! in the subject? seriously?
Sorry, but I don't see a
Still up here in Massachusetts over v4 and v6. Since 11:45am (that is PST, I
believe) there is still an ongoing issue with real-time updates according to
the Live Status page.
http://developers.facebook.com/live_status
Visiting that page just now, the latest API response time graphs are
Yeah it's back.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Mikhail Strizhov striz...@cs.colostate.edu
wrote:
Works fine here, Northern Colorado.
--
Sincerely,
Mikhail Strizhov
mailto:striz...@cs.colostate.edu
On 10/05/2010 10:47 PM, Patrick Muldoon wrote:
On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:44 AM, James
I am joining my voice to Steve's. I view this discussion on membership as
very healthy and it should continue until the community reaches a strong
consensus.
I think voting 'yes' is the way forward and I also pledge to do what I can
with my Board vote to keep from creating any categories of
An interesting exercise might be to compare the cost of a vote (thus
far the only membership benefit) today and as proposed.
-Today
Students:
Max 60/yr (20 per meeting) at $50 per (minimum $100 / 2 years)
Standard:
$225 (minimum 1 meeting at $450 / 2 years)
Freebies:
SC-approved
Yes, I think 'yes' is the right vote. I do have one major concern, but I will
vote 'yes' on both issues, regardless.
I really worry about the voter base becoming disjoint from the attendee base. I
think meeting attendees should get a vote as a part of attendance.
How this is handled is not
52 matches
Mail list logo
