The Curious Case of 143.95.0.0/16

Mel Beckman mel at beckman.org wrote: >I have one question, “of late”, regarding your post: Is it “Antia” or “Anita”? Yes. Sorry. There were multiple small typos in what I posted. Not surprising, since I am an utterly awful typist. The link I gave in my post provides enough redundant

Re: 44/8

> On Aug 27, 2019, at 23:50 , Bryan Fields wrote: > > On 8/27/19 11:52 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: >>> On Jul 26, 2019, at 21:59 , Doug Barton wrote: > > > >>> and I have known two of the ARDC board members and one of >>> the advisors listed at https://www.ampr.org/amprnet/ >>>

Re: The Curious Case of 143.95.0.0/16

Ronald, I have one question, “of late”, regarding your post: Is it “Antia” or “Anita”? :) -mel > On Aug 27, 2019, at 11:27 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette > wrote: > > Fair Warning: Those of you not enamored of my long-winded exposés of > various remarkable oddities of the IPv4 address space

Re: Reflection DDoS last week

On 2019-08-28 02:23, Damian Menscher via NANOG wrote: On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 3:21 PM Töma Gavrichenkov wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:17 AM Damian Menscher wrote: Some additional questions, if you're able to answer them (off-list is fine if there are things that can't be shared

Re: 44/8

On 8/27/19 11:52 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: >> On Jul 26, 2019, at 21:59 , Doug Barton wrote: >> and I have known two of the ARDC board members and one of >> the advisors listed at https://www.ampr.org/amprnet/ >> for over fifteen years. I consider them >> all

The Curious Case of 143.95.0.0/16

Fair Warning: Those of you not enamored of my long-winded exposés of various remarkable oddities of the IPv4 address space may wish to click on the tiny little wastebasket icons on your mail clients at this point. For the rest of you, please read on. I think you may find the following story