Re: Fwd: [nanog-admin] Vote on AUP submission to SC

2007-10-31 Thread Simon Lyall
3. Cross posting is prohibited. Just wondering on this one. It would appear to mainly hit things like the CIDR reports[1] , conference CFPs and news about new networks being allocated to the APNIC etc. Stopping these doesn't seem a priority. Or does it mean something else? [1] - These appear

Re: Fwd: [nanog-admin] Vote on AUP submission to SC

2007-10-31 Thread Sean Figgins
Martin Hannigan wrote: 3. Cross posting is prohibited. I think this needs more clarification, like Cross posting to other lists is prohibited, CCing individuals are permitted. I see no technical difference between cross posting to another list or just a list if individuals. 8.

Re: Fwd: [nanog-admin] Vote on AUP submission to SC

2007-10-31 Thread Sean Figgins
Alex Pilosov wrote: 8. Autoresponders sending mail either to the list or to the poster are prohibited. I also think this needs additional language to ensure that it is within the realm of the authority of the MLC/NANOG. NANOG has no authority to prohibit autoresponses that result in

Re: Fwd: [nanog-admin] Vote on AUP submission to SC

2007-10-31 Thread Alex Pilosov
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Sean Figgins wrote: I also think this needs additional language to ensure that it is within the realm of the authority of the MLC/NANOG. NANOG has no authority to prohibit autoresponses that result in a direct email to someone on the list. Without this language, you

Re: mail operators list

2007-10-31 Thread Steve Gibbard
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Joe Abley wrote: Mail seems to be one of those topics which is of interest to many nanog subscribers, but simultaneously annoying to many (presumably different) nanog subscribers. Given that observation, creating a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list for the discussion of e-mail