On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Steven Feldman <feld...@nanog.org> wrote:
> [Apologies for cross-posting; it turns out many members are not on the > nanog-futures list.] > > In our board meeting this week, we decided not to place this on this year's > ballot. We feel that as with other decisions regarding conference fees and > discounts, this is best left as an operational policy decision rather than a > corporate governance issue. > > I lost the context in this thread related to this statement, but I'm not sure why you need a ballot question related to day to day operations of the organization. Less overhead == better. Allowing volunteers that are elected and appointed to committee to have their admission waived benefits the organization to some extent. It's likely to widen the gene pool and provide NANOG v2 with some fresh meat, something that we are sorely in need of and the main reason why I support this. Best, -M<
_______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
