You know how easy it is to fake IRC logs?
Yes, I do. And I also know that these aren't fake. I've seen them before,
from some
respected sources in the ISP security community, and I've also seen Gregory's
manifesto sent
to the EFNet admins list admitting to having launched DDoS attacks
Matthew (yes I know it is you)
No, my name is Albert.
I have not attacked any Internet Service Provider or IRC server
in several years. I am and have been retired from the underground
for a long while now, despite the constant comments made to the contrary
by people who do not represent me in
Hello,
I just thought I should chime in here.
Below you will find OseK's (Greg Taylor) manifesto sent to EFnet admins
during an event last
year where OseK was attacking most EFnet servers.
Additionally, I can tell you that Greg was attacking my network at some
point in the last year,
Sorry about the last post, my client's linewrap seems to not work properly,
I'll try again.
Hello,
I just thought I should chime in here.
Below you will find OseK's (Greg Taylor) manifesto sent to EFnet admins
during an event last
year where OseK was attacking most EFnet servers.
People should be worried about stuff like this.
Banetele is a facilities-based network operator
in Norway and these guys are directly attacking
their BGP sessions to put them off the air.
Assuming that they are not sourcing the attacks
in Banetele's AS, then you, the peer of Banetele
are
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People should be worried about stuff like this. Banetele is a
facilities-based network operator in Norway and these guys are directly
attacking their BGP sessions to put them off the air.
Can anyone from Banetele/who knows Banetele confirm this
People should be worried about stuff like this. Banetele is a
facilities-based network operator in Norway and these guys are directly
attacking their BGP sessions to put them off the air.
Can anyone from Banetele/who knows Banetele confirm this attack took place?
According to the
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming that they are not sourcing the attacks
in Banetele's AS, then you, the peer of Banetele
are delivering the packet stream that kills the
BGP session. How long before peering agreements
require ACLs in border routers so that only BGP
peering routers
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 04:14:01 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to the people I spoke to, they had not noticed such an
attack
on the date specified.
And, while not knowing the specifics of this situation, if you were being
attacked, and it hurt
your network, would you continue to piss
: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:54 AM
Subject: Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People should be worried about stuff like this. Banetele is a
facilities-based network operator in Norway and these guys are directly
attacking their BGP sessions to put
Hmm, if someone (except masochists and security vendiors) still hosts
efnet... I can only send them my condoleences.
I saw sthe same dialogs 6 years ago. Nothing changes.
BaneTele hosts an EFnet IRC server. Caused no significant problems while
I was working at BaneTele. That's probably
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Alexei Roudnev wrote:
Hmm, if someone (except masochists and security vendiors) still hosts
efnet... I can only send them my condoleences.
I saw sthe same dialogs 6 years ago. Nothing changes.
What about undernet? A customer wants us to help him setup an undernet
IRC
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Alexei Roudnev wrote:
Hmm, if someone (except masochists and security vendiors) still hosts
efnet... I can only send them my condoleences.
I saw sthe same dialogs 6 years ago. Nothing changes.
What about undernet?
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, if someone (except masochists and security vendiors) still hosts
efnet... I can only send them my condoleences.
I saw sthe same dialogs 6 years ago. Nothing changes.
What about undernet?
Thats even worse :)
A customer wants us to
Why is NANOG starting to sound like full-disclosure? Can't you kids
just argue amongst yourselves on IRC or something? This is so
off-charter...
If any of the involved parties thinks anyone cares, you'd do well to check
your egos.
--
Charles Sprickman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004,
Yes, Gregory Taylor aka OseK is a perfect gentlemen now. Here are logs
from Feb 4th 2004 showing him being a perfect gentlemen...
(08:35:45) #sigdie!OseK_ :[NEMESIS] Nodes are attacking 212.242.41.0/24 on
port 666 for 60 seconds using spoofed TCP RESET Packets ...
(08:36:04) #sigdie!OseK_
On Monday, March 15, 2004 1:11 PM [EST], John Harold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, Gregory Taylor aka OseK is a perfect gentlemen now. Here are logs
from Feb 4th 2004 showing him being a perfect gentlemen...
You know how easy it is to fake IRC logs?
(16:12:01) #nanog!jh I l33t hax0red
Stop it children. The thousands of people on this mailing list do not need
to watch this road kill. -ren
At 06:11 PM 3/15/2004 +, John Harold wrote:
Yes, Gregory Taylor aka OseK is a perfect gentlemen now. Here are logs
from Feb 4th 2004 showing him being a perfect gentlemen...
: Stop it children. The thousands of people on this mailing list do not need
: to watch this road kill. -ren
But they sure make good kill file fodder !
James Edwards
Routing and Security
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At the Santa Fe Office: Internet at Cyber Mesa
Store hours: 9-6 Monday through Friday
ren wrote:
Stop it children. The thousands of people on this mailing list do not
need to watch this road kill. -ren
mode=voice in the wilderness
Some where it was ineffectively written that if you stop responding to
them, and particularly, if you stop endorsing the crap by quoting it
all
Susan,
could you please clarify the NANOG AUP for the benefit
of some of our young/new posters?
Thank you,
-David Barak
-Fully RFC 1925 Compliant-
--- John Harold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snipped IRC junk
=
David Barak
-fully RFC 1925 compliant-
__
Do you
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, David Barak wrote:
Susan,
could you please clarify the NANOG AUP for the benefit
of some of our young/new posters?
Thank you,
-David Barak
-Fully RFC 1925 Compliant-
Either that or they can check out the website,
http://www.nanog.org/aup.html
--
Greg,
Let me spell it out crystal clear so you can understand. Are you, or
are you not, the Gregory
Taylor referenced in the URL's I sent below?
Albert P.
(signing his real name so Susan won't remove him from the list)
maturity in its purest form.
-- Original Message
Matthew (yes I know it is you), The personal information you have posted regarding my
phone number is me. However, the slanderous material and obvious hate/flame
statements you made against me are absolutely false.
I have not attacked any Internet Service Provider or IRC server in several
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 10:43:29PM -0600, Gregory Taylor wrote:
Matthew (yes I know it is you), The personal information you
have posted regarding my phone number is me. However, the
slanderous material and obvious hate/flame statements you made
against me are absolutely false.
For
maturity in its purest form.
-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 17:17:42 -0800
I've noticed a number of shining stars in the network engineering industry
have graced us
with their presence and infinite wisdom in the
26 matches
Mail list logo
