SorryIt returns the namespace of the current node, so you'd have to
pull the namespace prefix off the node it would be attached to.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: Joe Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 1:02 PM
To: Shaw, Gerry; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shaw, Gerry wrote:
What do people think of the following syntax for the property task:
property prefix=win-vc7.
property name=cc value=${vs-net.dir}\VC7\BIN\cl.exe/
property name=lib value=${vs-net.dir}\VC7\BIN\lib.exe/
property name=link value=${vs-net.dir}\VC7\BIN\link.exe/
I think its a good idea. Howver the outer tag should probably be
propertygroup or somthing like that. I think the . seperator is fine.
Do others feel strongly about this? I have it working with property
prefix=. I like it being all in one task so that when the user reads
the docs for
Shaw, Gerry wrote:
I think its a good idea. Howver the outer tag should probably be
propertygroup or somthing like that. I think the . seperator is fine.
Do others feel strongly about this? I have it working with property
prefix=. I like it being all in one task so that when the
So people send in your votes on these topics:
1. propertygroup name=win or property prefix=win
property-group
2. separator attribute or no separator attribute
no separator
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that
Hello, everybody.
Until recently, I've done my .NET development in MS Visual Studio .NET.
These days, I am creating NAnt scripts for my solutions. Everything worked
great except the resource files in GUI projects: whenever I started a GUI
application, an exception would be thrown, claiming that
The nunit task will now look at the xml test results date stamp and
contents (looks for failures or errors). If the results datestamp is later
then the assembly's datestamp and the results show now errors or failures
the tests will be skipped.
This makes working on other nant tasks much faster
Klemen,
You've hit it right on the head. Its been the cumbersome way it is for a
while now. What you've proposed is pretty much how it should be. It
shouldn't be too hard to implement. If you want to take a stab at it go
ahead. Otherwise I'll start on it. Its been irking me for a while now
