Re: [nant-dev] Property names and functions

2002-08-27 Thread Ian MacLean
I'm starting work on adding functions to nant and the syntax I was thinking of using is this: Are we sure we need this. No disrespect but couldn't we do a lot of whats in these functions using the script task ?. Its a slipperly slope to be taking - just look at how xslt has evolved from

[nant-dev] Moving Project::ExpandProperties

2002-08-27 Thread Tomas Restrepo
Hi Guys, Quick question here: Would anyone object to moving the ExpandProperties() method currently defined in the Project class off to PropertyDictionary itself? I think it is more appropriate there, as, for one thing, expanding the strings doesn't actually require the full project object, just

RE: [nant-dev] Moving Project::ExpandProperties

2002-08-27 Thread Shaw, Gerry
Would anyone object to moving the ExpandProperties() method currently defined in the Project class off to PropertyDictionary itself? I think it is more appropriate there, Sounds like a good plan. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: