And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 20:10:20 -0700 (PDT) >From: Jason Spaulding >Subject: Re: Duh... >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >also at > >http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/ntreaty/nt001.htm > >Interesting that the gov't page is 403'ing at this time. >I am wondering why the claim that the Nebraska state line >is not definitive. Why not track down the NDN claim and >post the basis for this? > >Happy trails. > >============== >ARTICLE II. > > The United States agrees that the following >district of country, to wit, viz: > commencing on the east bank of the Missouri river where >the 46th parallel of > north latitude crosses the same, thence along low-water >mark down said east > bank to a point opposite where the northern line of the >State of Nebraska strikes > the river, thence west across said river, and along the >northern line of Nebraska > to the 104th degree of longitude west from Greenwich, >thence north on said > meridian to a point where the 46th parallel of north >latitude intercepts the same, > thence due east along said parallel to the place of >beginning; and in addition > thereto, all existing reservations of the east back of >said river, shall be and the > same is, set apart for the absolute and undisturbed use >and occupation of the > Indians herein named, and for such other friendly >tribes or individual Indians as > from time to time they may be willing, with the consent >of the United States, to > admit amongst them; and the United States now solemnly >agrees that no persons, > except those herein designated and authorized so to do, >and except such officers, > agents, and employees of the government as may be >authorized to enter upon > Indian reservations in discharge of duties enjoined by >law, shall ever be > permitted to pass over, settle upon, or reside in the >territory described in this > article, or in such territory as may be added to this >reservation for the use of said > Indians, and henceforth they will and do hereby >relinquish all claims or right in > and to any portion of the United States or Territories, >except such as is > embraced within the limits aforesaid, and except as >hereinafter provided. > > >--- Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> From: "Jordan S. Dill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: [FN] Laramie treaty et al >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> See <http://www.dickshovel.com/lara.html>... >> >> also at: >> http://www.eagleswatch.com/treaties.htm >> >> <<<< To remove your name from this list send a message to >> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with the message "unsubscribe >> triballaw" >>>> >> > >=== >"Jason Spaulding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >"I hate intellectual discussion. When I hear the words `phenomenology' or >`structuralism', I reach for my buck knife." --Edward Abbey > >-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >_________________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Reprinted under the fair use http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html doctrine of international copyright law. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit) Unenh onhwa' Awayaton http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/ &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
