around?
Cheers,
Marco Martin
___
Nepomuk mailing list
Nepomuk@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
models
it may make people want to implment gui pieces in the backend, so that may be
bad.
so, to summarise:
i would like to try it first with the media cente:
what exactly should be done to port the models?
Cheers,
Marco Martin
___
Nepomuk mailing list
for different reimplemented bindings, but if is just a simple listing of
stuff, no need to duplicate bugs ;)
It may be nepomuk-core? (since it has a library, so unsuited for kde-runtime)
anyways, as general concept.. opinions/comments?
Cheers,
Marco Martin
with an older nepomuk revision to see if we
can have a releasable image
Cheers,
Marco Martin
___
Nepomuk mailing list
Nepomuk@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
On Saturday 06 October 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
from a quick bisect test seems to have started to happen from the foloowing
revision of kdelibs:
3b0dc0438fdadcc3b509997be9f96046b40f4f92
anybody has an idea what may be happening?
i'm now trying to build packages with an older nepomuk
safe :p
Cheers,
Marco Martin
___
Nepomuk mailing list
Nepomuk@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
On Wednesday 11 July 2012, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote:
Yo all,
I tried to port some stuff to Nepomuk2, namely kactivities and
plasma-mobile
porting kactivities went smooth, and is now in the branch mart/nepomuk2
nepomuk2-rcgen. all
should be retrocompatible,
Vishes: what's the best way to proceed now?
Cheers,
Marco Martin
#
# Use the Nepomuk resource class generator to generate convinient Resource subclasses
# from ontologies.
#
# Usage:
# NEPOMUK_ADD_ONTOLOGY_CLASSES(sources-var
# [FAST
, with 6.1.4 all queries do work now :)
but the problem that remains is that is way slower than before, the same query
that before was nearly instantaneous now takes almost one minute to perform :/
--
Marco Martin
___
Nepomuk mailing list
Nepomuk@kde.org
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of virtuoso are you using?
And, yes, the virtuoso branch needs to be merged in kdelibs indeed.
i tried on 2 different systems with 6.1.2 and 6.1.4, now i'm trying to install
6.1.5
Cheers,
Marco Martin
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of virtuoso are you using?
And, yes, the virtuoso branch needs to be merged in kdelibs indeed.
i tried on 2 different systems with 6.1.2 and 6.1.4, now i'm trying to
install 6.1.5
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
please see if this patch fixes the issue.
On 05/31/2012 10:24 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of virtuoso are you using?
And, yes
On Thursday 31 May 2012, you wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
please see if this patch fixes the issue.
On 05/31/2012 10:24 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
please see if this patch fixes the issue.
On 05/31/2012 10:24 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of virtuoso are you using?
And, yes
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
ok, if i apply the attached patch to the nepomuk-core repository (besides
the kdelibs one) all seems to work correctly again
tough further testing needed
the kdelibs merge, and those 2 patches applied should really happen asap
before 4.9
iODBC Driver]
[Virtuoso Server]SQ074: Line 1: SP031: SPARQL: Internal error:
'output:valmode' declaration conflicts with 'output:format')
--
Marco Martin
___
Nepomuk mailing list
Nepomuk@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
it require a particular virtuoso version?
this is at the moment quite a blocker for 4.9
Cheers,
Marco Martin
___
Nepomuk mailing list
Nepomuk@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
On Wednesday 08 February 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question about the importing of shared-desktop-ontologies.
since this is a thing that takes a very long time is something that
should be done as less as possible.
on active we are shipping a dump of the whole database
reason, for maybe 10 subsequent boots before stopping.
the issue seems quite difficult to debug: from what events exactly
importing the ontologies happens?
is there any way/plan to improve startup performance in this regard?
Cheers,
Marco Martin
___
Nepomuk
seems strange is that there does not seem to be any query running and
taking long time, so is not really clear what is doing during those minutes.
any idea? and any idea on how some more informations could be gathered?
Cheers,
Marco Martin
Connected to OpenLink Virtuoso
Driver: 06.01.3127 OpenLink
try to modify the resulting sparql i guess ;)
--
Marco Martin
___
Nepomuk mailing list
Nepomuk@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
On Friday 14 October 2011, Marco Martin wrote:
Hi all,
in Plasma Active one things like the activity screen that shows all the
nepomuk resources, the ui to search and add a new one, the image viewer
(that lists all objects of type image) use the plasma metadata dataengine.
this one
kext:Activity
} group by ?a
--
Marco Martin
___
Nepomuk mailing list
Nepomuk@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
On Tuesday 18 October 2011, Marco Martin wrote:
#how many resources of each type
SELECT ?o count(*) as ?count
WHERE {?s rdf:type ?o}
group by ?o
uh, there is another issue on all the queries that have anything to do with
types.
in the presentation of the activity screen ui, we chosen
#ad3c79b80b619cab4841e8faa203fb3daad550c1ac98e41005749758fa
b9aded3f
So basically you must construct the query using the API and then add the
CreateCountQuery flag.
uhm, but does this support group by as well?
--
Marco Martin
___
Nepomuk mailing list
Nepomuk@kde.org
https
, not in the model)
Do you mean feasible in C++? Then the answer if of course yes. If you
say feasible in the desktop query language, then no.
was meaning both, so ok, will need some kind of c++ binding as well
--
Marco Martin
___
Nepomuk mailing
: this
will be done exactly like now with a plasma service, in this case created not
by the dataengine but by the model
comments? ideas? opinions?
Cheers,
Marco Martin
___
Nepomuk mailing list
Nepomuk@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
:50 p.m.)
Review request for Nepomuk, Plasma, Aaron J. Seigo, Marco Martin, and
Sebastian Trueg.
Summary
---
Desc of the class is in the class apidocs
Diffs
-
experimental/libkactivities/ResourceInstance.h PRE-CREATION
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r
work on nepomuk goes upstream?
it's all in playground/nepomuk, right?
here looks like there could be some duplication of effort with great
possibility of collaboration :)
Cheers,
Marco Martin
___
Nepomuk mailing list
Nepomuk@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org
29 matches
Mail list logo
