On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
yeah, that is a 6.1.5 bug. You have to downgrade to 6.1.4 or go on to
use the git version from gitbug.com/openlink/virtuoso-opensource branch
develop/6.0.
Actually we have to tell packagers to not package 6.1.5... might be a
problem
yeah,
On 06/01/2012 11:02 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
yeah, that is a 6.1.5 bug. You have to downgrade to 6.1.4 or go on to
use the git version from gitbug.com/openlink/virtuoso-opensource branch
develop/6.0.
Actually we have to tell packagers to not
which version of virtuoso are you using?
And, yes, the virtuoso branch needs to be merged in kdelibs indeed.
On 05/30/2012 05:16 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
Hi all,
I have found some problems with the current master status of the combination
nepomuk-core/kdelibs/kde-runtime (briefly talked
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of virtuoso are you using?
And, yes, the virtuoso branch needs to be merged in kdelibs indeed.
i tried on 2 different systems with 6.1.2 and 6.1.4, now i'm trying to install
6.1.5
Cheers,
Marco Martin
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of virtuoso are you using?
And, yes, the virtuoso branch needs to be merged in kdelibs indeed.
i tried on 2 different systems with 6.1.2 and 6.1.4, now i'm trying to
install 6.1.5
please see if this patch fixes the issue.
On 05/31/2012 10:24 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of virtuoso are you using?
And, yes, the virtuoso branch needs to be merged in kdelibs indeed.
i
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
please see if this patch fixes the issue.
On 05/31/2012 10:24 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of virtuoso are you using?
And, yes, the
On Thursday 31 May 2012, you wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
please see if this patch fixes the issue.
On 05/31/2012 10:24 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of
On 05/31/2012 10:56 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
please see if this patch fixes the issue.
On 05/31/2012 10:24 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of
On 05/31/2012 11:13 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, you wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
please see if this patch fixes the issue.
On 05/31/2012 10:24 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012,
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
please see if this patch fixes the issue.
On 05/31/2012 10:24 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of virtuoso are you using?
And, yes, the
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
ok, if i apply the attached patch to the nepomuk-core repository (besides
the kdelibs one) all seems to work correctly again
tough further testing needed
the kdelibs merge, and those 2 patches applied should really happen asap
before 4.9
support for FILTER [NOT] EXISTS has been in Virtuoso since 6.1.3. I
never had any problems here. I suspect an installation problem on your
end. Maybe an old installation in /usr/local or somewhere else?
Try virtuoso-t --version
On 05/31/2012 02:54 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
support for FILTER [NOT] EXISTS has been in Virtuoso since 6.1.3. I
never had any problems here. I suspect an installation problem on your
end. Maybe an old installation in /usr/local or somewhere else?
Try virtuoso-t --version
yeah, was a
yeah, that is a 6.1.5 bug. You have to downgrade to 6.1.4 or go on to
use the git version from gitbug.com/openlink/virtuoso-opensource branch
develop/6.0.
Actually we have to tell packagers to not package 6.1.5... might be a
problem
On 05/31/2012 04:54 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May
Hi all,
I have found some problems with the current master status of the combination
nepomuk-core/kdelibs/kde-runtime (briefly talked about on irc but just to want
give an historic record here)
now most queries seem to hold no results, the problem seems to be in the
recent inference work,
16 matches
Mail list logo
