On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
yeah, that is a 6.1.5 bug. You have to downgrade to 6.1.4 or go on to
use the git version from gitbug.com/openlink/virtuoso-opensource branch
develop/6.0.
Actually we have to tell packagers to not package 6.1.5... might be a
problem
yeah,
On 06/01/2012 11:02 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
yeah, that is a 6.1.5 bug. You have to downgrade to 6.1.4 or go on to
use the git version from gitbug.com/openlink/virtuoso-opensource branch
develop/6.0.
Actually we have to tell packagers to not
which version of virtuoso are you using?
And, yes, the virtuoso branch needs to be merged in kdelibs indeed.
On 05/30/2012 05:16 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
Hi all,
I have found some problems with the current master status of the combination
nepomuk-core/kdelibs/kde-runtime (briefly talked
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of virtuoso are you using?
And, yes, the virtuoso branch needs to be merged in kdelibs indeed.
i tried on 2 different systems with 6.1.2 and 6.1.4, now i'm trying to install
6.1.5
Cheers,
Marco Martin
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of virtuoso are you using?
And, yes, the virtuoso branch needs to be merged in kdelibs indeed.
i tried on 2 different systems with 6.1.2 and 6.1.4, now i'm trying to
install 6.1.5
please see if this patch fixes the issue.
On 05/31/2012 10:24 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of virtuoso are you using?
And, yes, the virtuoso branch needs to be merged in kdelibs indeed.
i
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
please see if this patch fixes the issue.
On 05/31/2012 10:24 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of virtuoso are you using?
And, yes, the
On Thursday 31 May 2012, you wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
please see if this patch fixes the issue.
On 05/31/2012 10:24 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of
On 05/31/2012 10:56 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
please see if this patch fixes the issue.
On 05/31/2012 10:24 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of
On 05/31/2012 11:13 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, you wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
please see if this patch fixes the issue.
On 05/31/2012 10:24 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012,
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
please see if this patch fixes the issue.
On 05/31/2012 10:24 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
which version of virtuoso are you using?
And, yes, the
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Marco Martin wrote:
ok, if i apply the attached patch to the nepomuk-core repository (besides
the kdelibs one) all seems to work correctly again
tough further testing needed
the kdelibs merge, and those 2 patches applied should really happen asap
before 4.9
support for FILTER [NOT] EXISTS has been in Virtuoso since 6.1.3. I
never had any problems here. I suspect an installation problem on your
end. Maybe an old installation in /usr/local or somewhere else?
Try virtuoso-t --version
On 05/31/2012 02:54 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May
On Thursday 31 May 2012, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
support for FILTER [NOT] EXISTS has been in Virtuoso since 6.1.3. I
never had any problems here. I suspect an installation problem on your
end. Maybe an old installation in /usr/local or somewhere else?
Try virtuoso-t --version
yeah, was a
yeah, that is a 6.1.5 bug. You have to downgrade to 6.1.4 or go on to
use the git version from gitbug.com/openlink/virtuoso-opensource branch
develop/6.0.
Actually we have to tell packagers to not package 6.1.5... might be a
problem
On 05/31/2012 04:54 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 31 May
15 matches
Mail list logo
