Hi Madhusudhana,
Did you go back and confirm Wes' theory? Did you see an authPriv
request which failed, followed by and auth request that succeeded?
Robert
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 04:19:28 + Madhusudhana wrote:
MR> Thanks Wes.
MR>
MR> -Original Message-
MR> From: Wes Hardaker
On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 20:37:45 -0800 Bart wrote:
BVA> On 1/2/19 2:28 PM, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders wrote:
BVA> > [...] Thus, it's time to reconsider whether we should make
BVA> > the move or whether people have concerns worth addressing.
BVA> >
BVA> > Thoughts?
BVA>
BVA> [...] However, SF
On Tue, 08 Jan 2019 08:40:20 -0800 Wes wrote:
WHVNSC> Magnus Fromreide writes:
WHVNSC>
WHVNSC> > I suppose the default value of the access control is
WHVNSC> > "auth", the man page didn't say what the effects of that
WHVNSC> > was?
WHVNSC> >
WHVNSC> > I think this is a bad idea as a default
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 09:35:22 -0400 Simon wrote:
SC> While trying to port the newly released net-snmp to yocto, I am
SC> getting the following error:
SC>
SC> ERROR: This autoconf log indicates errors, it looked at host
SC> include and/or library paths while determining system
SC> capabilities.
Josef,
Two points..
First, are you also submitting these patches to the patch database?
The mailing list if fine for discussion, but when we do patch
review we go through the database, not the mailing list.
Second, 'request for votes' is something specific to the Net-SNMP
release process. The
On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 12:33:36 +0530 Thommandra wrote:
TG> > Configure can exclude entire MIBs, but not individual OIDs.
TG> > You can modify the code, but make sure you deal with get and
TG> > get-next properly.
TG>
TG> Even if we comment/modify the code for individual OIDs, we
TG> cannot skip OIDs
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 18:07:51 +0530 Thommandra wrote:
TG> > For snmpd, you can configure VACM views in snmpd.conf to
TG> > exclude certain OIDS. It's not very intuitive, but should be
TG> > possible.
TG>
TG> Can we remove the OIDs at compile time (using configure option)
TG> like we do for
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 19:05:59 +0530 Thommandra wrote:
TG> - How can we disable an OID from snmpwalk output?
For snmpd, you can configure VACM views in snmpd.conf to exclude
certain OIDS. It's not very intuitive, but should be possible.
For the client, there isn't a way to not query for something
On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 12:38:27 +0530 Pushpa wrote:
PT> I would like to know that why snmp identifies
PT> configuration-items (and traps) by OID (.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2)
PT> but not as normal acii string/keywords (eg: sysObjectID or
PT> anything ascii).
In what context? If you are referring to program
On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:38:27 -0700 Bart wrote:
BVA> Can you explain why you have ignored all nine patches that I
BVA> posted one week ago? Had you noticed that one of these patches
BVA> is a build fix? See also
BVA> https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/mailman/message/36349380/.
I did not ignore
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 19:54:31 -0300 Nico wrote:
N> This leads to problems if local equipment startup is in wrong
N> order (dns after snmpd).
N>
N> Other scenario with the same problem is if the IP/name mapping
N> changes with snmpd running, Either because of /etc/host edit or
N> dynamic IP
Net-SNMP 5.8.rc4 is now available for testing at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.8-release-candidates/
Below is a summary of the change in 5.8.rc4. Please see the CHANGES
file for a more detailed list of specific bugs/patches that have
been fixed/applied, and the
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 07:00:57 -0700 Bart wrote:
BVA> When I fixed the fmtaddr implementation in several Net-SNMP
BVA> transports I hadn't noticed that these changes broke the
BVA> target MIB. Hence this patch that fixes the target MIB.
+1
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 13:18:18 +0530 RAHUL wrote:
RS> I am trying to implement account lockout for v3 user in netsnmp.
RS> When the user enters lockout mode, I want to drop all the v3
RS> packets sent during lockout period.
RS> Can this be achieved by doing some changes in snmpd.conf file?
No, there
Net-SNMP 5.8.rc3 is now available for testing at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.8-release-candidates/
Below is a summary of the major changes in 5.8.rc3.
Please see the CHANGES file for a more detailed list of specific
bugs/patches that have been fixed/applied,
On Mon, 21 May 2018 10:12:37 -0700 Bart wrote:
BVA> This patch should work for both newer and older Cygwin
BVA> versions.
+1
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites,
On Sun, 20 May 2018 13:06:43 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> I do not think that now is the time to try to deal with any of
BF> the fundamentals, but just not regress from previous released
BF> behavior, and deal with the underlying issue in 5.8.1 / 5.7.4.
Just to clarify, do you mean
a) accepts Bart's
On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:07:56 -0700 Bart wrote:
BVA> strlcpy() implementations typically scan for the end of the
BVA> source argument passed to strlcpy(). Hence avoid passing an
BVA> unterminated string to strlcpy().
I'm going to say -1, but for the patch and not the need to fix the
issue.
This
Net-SNMP 5.8.rc2 is now available for testing at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.8-release-candidates/
Below is a summary of the major changes in 5.8.rc2
Please see the CHANGES file for a more detailed list of specific
bugs/patches that have been fixed/applied,
On Wed, 16 May 2018 07:23:32 -0700 Bart wrote:
BVA> This patch makes it possible to enable Travis and Appveyor
BVA> continuous integration support. On Travis Net-SNMP is built
BVA> with all MIBs, with --disable-set-support, with
BVA> --enable-mini-agent, with --enable-minimalist and with
BVA>
A fix in pre2 or pre3 fixed use of -Z command line argument for
setting engineBoots/engineTime. The snmptrap app needs to be fixed
as well.
[PATCH] also fix snmptrap for setting engineBoots and engineTime (e.g. -Z cli
arg)
An addendum for earlier fix for agent side (commit
On Tue, 15 May 2018 17:00:10 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> Robert Story <rst...@freesnmp.com> writes:
WH>
WH> > We're at +2 now (assuming an implied +1 from your
WH> > message/tone).
WH>
WH> Yeah, I thought I had indicated +1 explicitly. I didn't, my
WH> bad. To me,
On Wed, 16 May 2018 03:13:34 +0200 Magnus wrote:
MF> > Yes, but it doesn't break for a default configure, which is
MF> > the criteria for a show stopper in the RC phase. Of course +3
MF> > votes for anything is an automatic show stopper too, so we're
MF> > one vote away from that.
MF>
MF> +1
On Wed, 16 May 2018 03:07:21 +0200 Magnus wrote:
MF> I changed the definition of oid from
MF>
MF> typedef unsigned long oid;
MF>
MF> to
MF>
MF> typedef uint32_t oid;
MF>
MF> a while back but that patch broke some precompiled HP managment
MF> module so it got rolled back but it sure would be
On Tue, 15 May 2018 10:58:58 +0200 Michael wrote:
MS> at the moment the proc option only checks the output of ps -e
MS> for process names.
MS>
MS> Is it possible to extend the MIB and the agent that something
MS> like that will be possible:
MS>
MS> proc
MS>
MS> this extension would check
On Tue, 15 May 2018 12:12:18 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> Robert Story <rst...@freesnmp.com> writes:
WH>
WH> > On Tue, 15 May 2018 11:25:03 -0400 Bill wrote:
WH> > BF> Since snmpping requires set support, it should be
WH> > BF> conditional. My proposed patch is
On Tue, 15 May 2018 18:28:12 +0530 Anandaprabu wrote:
AV> Between SNMP Agent and Master OID is the common parameter. Will
AV> the Object name also should be same in Master and Agent?
If they are loading the same MIB definitions, they will be able to
consistently convert between names and OIDs.
On Tue, 15 May 2018 11:07:29 -0700 Bart wrote:
BVA> On 05/15/18 10:57, Robert Story wrote:
BVA> > On Tue, 15 May 2018 11:25:03 -0400 Bill wrote:
BVA> > BF> Since snmpping requires set support, it should be
BVA> > BF> conditional. My proposed patch is
BVA> >
On Tue, 15 May 2018 15:50:20 +0200 Niels wrote:
NBVNSC> The new at_solaris access module does not compile. May I
NBVNSC> solicit votes for this patch for the missing include file?
+1
--
Check out the vibrant tech
On Tue, 15 May 2018 11:25:03 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> Since snmpping requires set support, it should be conditional.
BF> My proposed patch is
I don't think this meets the criteria for a show-stopper, since
it's not part of the default build.
-1
On Mon, 14 May 2018 15:28:31 +0530 Anandaprabu wrote:
AV> As per my project requirement I was requested by the NMS to
AV> send Textual Object name in a column of a Table.
AV>
AV> Like after adding the Managed device to NMS, the device should
AV> make a queue of updated objects in a table (let's
On Mon, 14 May 2018 08:45:54 -0700 Bart wrote:
BVA> On 05/14/18 05:29, Niels Baggesen via Net-snmp-coders wrote:
BVA> > The patch that went into 5.7-patches is not sufficient for
BVA> > NetBSD 8 on 5.8
BVA> >
BVA> > The following patch to 5.8.RC1 is required.
BVA> >
BVA> > May I solicit some
On Mon, 14 May 2018 08:44:19 -0700 Bart wrote:
BVA> >
https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/code/ci/3defab66a7aee60ba582a8254412abd2e630c321/
BVA> >
BVA> > It turns out that when you specify a clientaddr, the steps
BVA> > the function takes are:
BVA> >
BVA> > - zero out addr_pair
BVA> > - store
On Sun, 13 May 2018 18:15:16 -0700 Keith wrote:
KM> On Sun, May 13, 2018, at 3:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
KM> > Should a list of to-do items be added to the Net-SNMP wiki?
KM>
KM> I think a to-do wiki page on github would be a good idea to
KM> deal with what needs to be done. Then, as each
On Sun, 13 May 2018 14:31:39 -0700 Bart wrote:
BVA> The winExtDLL code assumes that sizeof(oid) == 4. Hence define
BVA> the 'oid' type as unsigned int when building with MSVC, MinGW
BVA> or Cygwin. This patch avoids that building winExtDLL with
BVA> Cygwin64 fails on the following statement:
BVA>
On Sun, 13 May 2018 14:31:38 -0700 Bart wrote:
BVA> Since Net-SNMP version 5.8 will be released soon and since no
BVA> prior version has been released from the v5.8 (master) branch
BVA> yet this is a good time to review the public header files and
BVA> verify whether any potentially backwards
On Thu, 10 May 2018 08:46:17 -0700 Bart wrote:
BVA> On 05/06/18 17:32, Robert Story wrote:
BVA> > The first release candidate for the next release of Net-SNMP
BVA> > is available for testing [1]. [...]
BVA> [...]
BVA> Since we are preparing the first v5.8 release, do you thin
On Fri, 11 May 2018 21:48:52 +0100 Stuart wrote:
SH> From 216f6e4e5c600dc82c27fe67a01bb8f4304d0ddb Mon Sep 17
SH> 00:00:00 2001 From: Stuart Henderson
SH> Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 21:48:22 +0100
SH> Subject: [PATCH] Install missing system header files
Thanks again. Applied
On Sat, 12 May 2018 12:38:10 +0100 Stuart wrote:
SH> The USM_*_PROTO_*_LEN constant macros removed in 329a9d3c9 are
SH> used in other programs using Net-SNMP libraries. I noticed a
SH> problem building PHP against 5.8.rc1 but looking at
SH> codesearch.debian.net I find a few other programs that
On Mon, 7 May 2018 22:08:15 +0200 Niels wrote:
NBVNSC> Den 07-05-2018 kl. 06:13 skrev Bart Van Assche:
NBVNSC> > A recent patch introduced an invocation of
NBVNSC> > AC_CHECK_HEADER before AC_AIX. However, AC_AIX must be
NBVNSC> > invoked before AC_CHECK_HEADER. Hence move AC_AIX from
NBVNSC> >
On Mon, 07 May 2018 11:44:59 -0500 Mark wrote:
MF> The HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrSWInstalled support for FreeBSD pkg
MF> stops working after so many queries and requires an snmpd
MF> process restart. I have been observing this for quite some time
MF> and have only recently started to debug it. The
The first release candidate for the next release of Net-SNMP is
available for testing [1]. Please give it a try and file bug reports
[2] if you run into any problems.
Here is brief summary of changes for 5.8 release candidates and
pre-release:
*5.8.rc1*
snmpd:
- BUG: 2864: use
On Sun, 6 May 2018 09:31:37 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> I think feature parity is a good thing. How close are you to
BF> having
BF> > this patch ready? I'd say create a branch for it and push it
BF> > to teh SF or github repo. Seeing the actual patch will help
BF> > me form my opinion on rc1 (maybe if
On Fri, 4 May 2018 13:58:09 +0100 Stuart wrote:
SH> Picking out a few things I've had patched in the OpenBSD port
SH> for ages. This one is needed for 5.9+ (released in 2016 -
SH> OpenBSD has two releases per year and only supports the most
SH> recent two) but is harmless for older versions.
I've added a call to fsync in 5-7-patches and master.
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:18:57 -0500 (EST) Josef wrote:
JR> net-snmp's configuration files are not resilient to power
JR> failure.
JR>
JR> following a power failure event users created with
JR> net-snmp-create-v3-user are missing from
On Fri, 4 May 2018 11:25:35 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> I started writing a test for this, and found that it's seriously
BF> convoluted. The combination of clientaddr + trap*sink results
BF> in the bind() attempting to use port 161 for the clientaddr, so
BF> it doesn't work as non-root (in the test
On Fri, 4 May 2018 11:40:21 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> I apologize for mis-speaking. I meant, session.localname,
BF> which is used in _sess_open() as follows:
BF>
BF>
https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/code/ci/master/tree/snmplib/snmp_api.c#l1629
Ok, thanks for the pointer. So right now the only
On Fri, 4 May 2018 17:01:05 +0100 Stuart wrote:
SH> On 2018/05/04 10:37, Robert Story wrote:
SH> Personally I think it's a disservice to users to enable them to
SH> run with such an old version of OpenBSD - there's a 2-release
SH> cutoff for important fixes in the base OS and 6 mont
On Fri, 04 May 2018 10:25:15 -0700 Keith wrote:
KM> I feel that Net-SNMP should follow what the OS maintainers are
KM> willing to support. If they're saying they're only going back 2
KM> versions; I strongly urge the team to cut the support for them
KM> loose.
You will get strong argument from at
On Fri, 4 May 2018 05:16:29 -0700 Bart wrote:
BVA> Thanks for having drawn our attention to that bug report. How
BVA> about fixing bug 2831 with the below patch?
BVA> [...]
BVA> include/net-snmp/agent/agent_internal_vars.h | 25
BVA> [...]
BVA> +#include
In order to make it clear that this
On Fri, 4 May 2018 13:58:43 +0100 Stuart wrote:
SH> This is needed for OpenBSD 5.6+. It does break older versions
SH> but 5.6 was released in 2014 and support for this ended Oct
SH> 2015; I'd find it unlikely that anyone still running this would
SH> be building up-to-date net-snmp.
We try really
On Fri, 4 May 2018 15:03:48 +0530 Deepak wrote:
DS> int ret; char str_pwd[4]="";
DS>.
DS> case MODE_SET_COMMIT:
DS> str_ pwd=*(requests->requestvb->val.string);
You are assigning a pointer to a character array. Just pass
val.string to write() directly. Of course, this
On Thu, 3 May 2018 14:32:40 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> > On Wed, 2 May 2018 11:08:44 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> > BF> I just filed
BF> > BF> https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2864/ :
BF> > BF> "clientaddr" doesn't work to set the source address for
BF> > BF> traps any more. (And given that the code
On Thu, 3 May 2018 14:29:09 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 1:07 PM, Robert Story
BF> <rst...@freesnmp.com> wrote:
BF> Depends on at what level you are looking at the functionality.
BF> -@ would set session.localaddr, which is a little different
BF> than setting
On Thu, 3 May 2018 21:48:50 +0100 Stuart wrote:
SH> On 2018-04-27, Robert Story <rst...@freesnmp.com> wrote:
SH> > We're closing in on a final release. The current plan is to
SH> > have release candidate 1 next week.
SH>
SH> Is it planned to address
SH> https://s
On Wed, 2 May 2018 11:49:46 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> Is it too late to add this? This occurs to me just because it’s
BF> an easier way to test the transports’ support of clientaddr, by
BF> being able to set clientaddr dynamically via the command line,
BF> and I just noticed that this is broken in
On Wed, 2 May 2018 11:08:44 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> I just filed https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2864/ :
BF> "clientaddr" doesn't work to set the source address for traps
BF> any more. (And given that the code path is the same, I suspect
BF> it doesn't work for client requests either).
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 23:00:57 -0700 Keith wrote:
KM> > BVA> > https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/code/merge-requests/14/.
KM> > BVA> > [...]
KM> Let me give this another go. I think the best solution is when
KM> --with-openssl is processed that a variable like
KM> "blumenthalcapable" be set based
On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 12:10:12 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> BF> It's plausible that a workaround as simple as
BF> > BF>
BF> > BF> +/*
BF> > BF> + * We lie about being SNMPv3, because ...
BF> > BF> + */
BF> > BF> if (add_trap_session(main_session,
BF> > BF> AGENTX_MSG_NOTIFY, 1,
BF> > BF>
A pre-release version of the next major Net-SNMP release is now
available for testing. Net-SNMP 5.8.pre3 can be downloaded from:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.8-pre-releases/
Partial summary of changes since since 5.8.pre2:
*5.8.pre3*
snmplib:
- Asn1:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:24:12 -0700 Keith wrote:
KM> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, at 12:08 PM, Robert Story wrote:
KM> > We've had recent discussions on this, and I think we'll be
KM> > moving the source to github in the near future.
KM>
KM> I think it would be best to get full ag
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:53:35 -0700 Keith wrote:
KM> I feel the best solution would be to remove the typecasts going
KM> on inside sc_get_openssl_hashfn(). It seems to me that having
KM> these typecasts there is triggering the implicit declaration of
KM> EVP_sha512() that lead to the crash we both
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 22:07:27 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> >>> (The context is that the library now tries to suppress
BF> >>> converting traps from v1 to v2 or vice versa if there is no
BF> >>> trap sink of the right type, but, it does not know how to
BF> >>> treat agentx sessions so doesn't count them -
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 20:08:19 +0530 Venkateswarlu wrote:
VK> I am facing one issue with snmp. While fecting the
VK> ifPhysAddress for my device interfaces, one of the mac address
VK> is displaying wrong data.
VK>
VK> Version : 5.7.3
VK> OS: armv7l GNU/Linux
VK>
VK> One of my ineterface is having
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:05:06 -0600 Bart wrote:
BVA> On 04/25/18 11:54, Keith Mendoza wrote:
BVA> > Out of curiosity, do you have a "fork" of Net-SNMP on github
BVA> > to connect it to Travis and Appveyor?
BVA>
BVA> If you are looking for a Net-SNMP repository on github, please
BVA> use
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:28:59 -0600 Bart wrote:
BVA> On 04/25/18 10:04, Keith Mendoza wrote:
BVA> > I have submitted a merge request to verify that when the
BVA> > --enable-blumenthal-aes is used in configure that it checks
BVA> > that OpenSSL's aes.h and evp.h are available. Merge request
BVA> >
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 10:31:13 -0500 Ian wrote:
IB> This morning we (Keith, Ian) met with an assortment of the
IB> NET-SNMP developers / contributors (primarily Bart Van Assche)
IB> to discuss how we could best help the project. The meeting went
IB> well, at least form our perspective.
I'm sorry I
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:06:28 -0600 Bart wrote:
BVA> One of the advantages of github over SourceForge is that
BVA> integration with continuous integration (CI) services like
BVA> Travis and Appveyor is easy. Adding such support however
BVA> requires to add proper configuration files and the
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 3:11 PM, Robert Story <rst...@freesnmp.com> wrote:
> A pre-release version of the next major Net-SNMP release is now
> available for testing. Net-SNMP 5.8.pre3 can be downloaded from:
>
This announcement had a typo. Release 5.8.pre2 (not pre3) is ava
A pre-release version of the next major Net-SNMP release is now
available for testing. Net-SNMP 5.8.pre3 can be downloaded from:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.8-pre-releases/
Partial summary of changes since since 5.8.pre2:
snmplib:
- TLS/DTLS fixes
On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 21:41:06 -0800 duocell wrote:
D> Need some help to debug the "send response: too long" error in
D> net-snmp-5.7.3
D>
D> I keeps hitting the following error.
D>
D> "length of packet 1513 exceeds session maximum 1472"
D>
D> [snip
D>
D> How to limit the response pkt size?
A pre-release version of the next major Net-SNMP release is now
available for testing. Net-SNMP 5.8.pre1 can be downloaded from:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/5.8-pre-releases/
* Net-SNMP version 5.8 introduces support for new Authentication
protocols defined in RFC 7860. The
On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 15:47:58 +0530 Neena wrote:
NMS> What is the plan to suport rfc7860 in netsnmp code ? Is beta
NMS> version available ?
Funny you should ask.. There is a pre-pre release of Net-SNMP 5.8
available, or you can use the master branch in git. I should be
making an announcement soon.
> Thanks! I'll note that this still results in multiple different
> versions of X509_NAME_ENTRY_get_data() and
> X509_NAME_ENTRY_get_object() in snmp_openssl.c, but that's in the
> code path I'm not using, so I'm unblocked for now.
Ok, change pushed to 5.7-patches and master.
demo
Note that the name here doesn't match the name you've configured in the
agent, but that shouldn't affect ireasoning.
--
Robert Story <http://www.isi.edu/~rstory>
USC Information Sciences Institute <http://www.isi.edu/>
--
repo if it's public and I'll cherry-pick your changes over?
attached
--
Robert Story <http://www.isi.edu/~rstory>
USC Information Sciences Institute <http://www.isi.edu/>
commit 89c9d93f2f24cea7f8dac12d36f31daf12419203
Author: Robert Story <rst...@freesnmp.com>
Date: Wed D
L_DH_H)
> && !defined(HAVE_DH_funcXX)). The certificate related functions with
> the (poorly named) LIBSSL ifdef would follow.
The attached patch against master builds with and without TLS
transports on CentOS 6 (openssl 1.0) and Fedora 27 (openssl 1.1).
--
Robert Story <http://www.isi.
IBSSL ifdef
would follow.
--
Robert Story <http://www.isi.edu/~rstory>
USC Information Sciences Institute <http://www.isi.edu/>
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging t
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 09:45:18 + Madhusudhana wrote:
MR> Below is the configuration, where all 3 sessions are destined
MR> to same IP and port (could be a wrong configuration). In this
MR> case, will there be 3 trapsessions to same destination IP:port?
MR> Or will SNMP filter out the duplicated
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:50:24 + Vibhavari wrote:
MV> I had a MIB file XXXMIB.txt. It had 8 MIB objects. I added 5
MV> more objects to it and I restarted snmpd service. But when I do
MV> snmp walk it shows old OID list only ( previous 8) . New 5 are
MV> not added to it. My mib file is already
On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 20:57:04 +0100 Ján wrote:
JG> is there any way how to programmatically (from our app loaded
JG> as a dlmod module) set destination host for traps (trap2sink
JG> config option)? I'm able to create new trap session via
JG> function create_trap_session(). The problem is that I
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 06:46:49 + YANG wrote:
YK> I find net-snmp using configure file to configure the manager
YK> that want receive the trap. Such as lines in snmpd.conf:
YK>
YK> trapsink localhost public
YK> trap2sinklocalhost public
YK>
YK> We want using pollingTable to manage
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 11:34:53 + Madhusudhana wrote:
MR> My query is regarding trap sessions.
MR> I have a below configuration where I have a trap user
MR> 'Operator1'created with 3 trap sessions with different IP: Port
MR> as shown below.
MR>
MR> createUser Operator1 MD5 "password@123"
MR>
MR>
On Fri 2017-10-27 04:34:01-0400 Josef wrote:
> From my point of view, I have done all that I could.
I have a question about one part of the patch:
diff -urNp old/snmplib/scapi.c new/snmplib/scapi.c
--- old/snmplib/scapi.c 2014-12-08 21:23:22.0 +0100
+++ new/snmplib/scapi.c 2017-02-20
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 04:34:01 -0400 (EDT) Josef wrote:
JR> These changes has been delivered to upstream, unfortunately,
JR> nobody has response on them yet and I do not have commit access
JR> to official net-snmp repository.
I found fedora bug:
Hi Florian,
Just following up.. Did you create a patch and/or bug report for
this?
Robert
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 22:41:04 -0400 Robert wrote:
RS> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 08:33:42 +0200 Florian wrote:
RS> FF> I noticed that snmp_sess_synch_response() *sometimes* (not
RS> FF> always) frees the
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 22:43:36 -0400 Nishikant wrote:
ND> I have created a multithreaded application where each thread
ND> creates a session, creates a PDU and sends it using snmp_send.
ND> If I do snmp_close(session) after snmp_send, after a while I am
ND> getting some sort of double free
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:51:48 +0530 deepak.sachan wrote:
DSDS> I have generate a loadable module for my device i.e.
DSDS> device.so. I have edited snmpd.conf for loading module using
DSDS> dlmod. It working fine. snmpget and snmpset working fine.
DSDS> This device.so has been used for remote
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:52:07 +0800 Chih-Ting wrote:
CTK> I met a problem about snmpv3 Diffie-Helman with net-snmp.
CTK>
CTK> Cable modem use SnmpV3 Kickstart Manager Public Number to get
CTK> its v3 user's password finally.
CTK> SecurityName: "docsisManager"
CTK> Random Number: [snip]
CTK>
CTK>
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 08:33:42 +0200 Florian wrote:
FF> I noticed that snmp_sess_synch_response() *sometimes* (not
FF> always) frees the "netsnmp_pdu *pdu" argument passed to it when
FF> returning STAT_ERROR. For example:
FF>
FF> snmp_sess_session() == NULL -> pdu is not freed
FF>
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 18:45:55 +0200 Augusto wrote:
AC> The new version of MariaDB C/C (3.x) [1] dropped some
AC> header files from install (my_global.h for instance), now
AC> mainly relying just on mysql.h.
AC>
AC> This change causes a build error on net-snmp mysql/mariadb
AC> module:
AC>
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:42:20 + Madhusudhana wrote:
MR> I am implementing SET request and I have varbind of type OBJECT
MR> ID for which an object ID can be set as a value. My query is
MR> how can I validate a correct object id. Currently, I am able
MR> to give an invalid object ID
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 17:54:05 +0200 Ignacy wrote:
IG> I've come across a problem that has been traced down to the way
IG> the table helper handlers are processing OIDs.
IG>
IG> I have a table indexed by a MacAddress. If I pass a short OID,
IG> i.e. one that has less bytes than required
IG> (say,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 20:42:39 + Michael wrote:
MS> This is my first time working with SNMP, but after reading the
MS> SNMP pages I'm still having trouble getting a simple shell
MS> script to run when receiving a trap.
Did you resolve this issue?
MS> Now it seems that the trap does get logged,
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 07:52:05 + Marek wrote:
MJ> When can we expect support of RFC 7860 in Net-SNMP?
MJ> I read on different forums that version 5.8 is going to support
MJ> it but did find any date when it will be released.
We hope to start with 5.8 pre-release in the very near future...
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 19:48:01 -0500 M. wrote:
MWT> I'm working on a project using net-snmp with DTLS and would
MWT> like to know the plans for DTLS support going forward. It is
MWT> my understanding that SNMP using TLS/DLTS is the path forward
MWT> but there isn't much information regarding a time
Progress has been made once again on the upcoming 5.4.5 release.
Pre2 is now available.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/5.4.5-pre-releases/
--
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:15:26 + Moreno wrote:
MF> Hello,
MF>
MF> I want to switch off all the parts of the code that are under
MF> #ifndef NETSNMP_FEATURE_REMOVE_LOGGING_SYSLOG because I don't
MF> have openlog() syslog() and closelog() on my platform.
MF>
MF> I didn't find the usual switch in
On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 08:00:30 -0500 (EST) Josef wrote:
JR> Hi, is there some way how to edit snmptrapd user (change user's
JR> password etc)? Something like snmpusm that is used for editing
JR> snmpd users?
You should be able to use snmpusm and specify -n snmptrapd to edit
snmptrapd's usm user
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 19:26:50 + cai wrote:
CA> But I found, when I include some special letters like dash or
CA> underscore in user name, it will failed to show correct user
CA> in /var/net-snmp/snmpd.conf. For example, when user name is
CA> "testsnmp-1", then result is:
CA>
CA> usmUser 1 3
1 - 100 of 1455 matches
Mail list logo