Art Galleries have problems with formats - for whatever reasons.
Digital prints have become pretty acceptable to them now - as objects
that they can sell - but screen based work I don't think so.
dave
2010/1/20 helen varley jamieson he...@creative-catalyst.com:
yes, i do - cyberformance (live
http://www.aesthetics-online.org/articles/index.php?articles_id=43
My main disagreement with Lopes concerns his claim that there is no
digital art form and the reasoning that leads him thereby to conclude that
the computer art form must be interactive. Art kinds for Lopes are simply
kinds of art,
I hardly have the energy to read your post in detail Rob. This is not a
criticism of what you have written but due to my lack of tolerance for
arguments over terminology. When I see an essay seeking nomenclatures for
novel practices I tend to turn off. They rarely contribute to either the
practice
On 20/01/10 16:36, Simon Biggs wrote:
I hardly have the energy to read your post in detail Rob. This is not a
criticism of what you have written but due to my lack of tolerance for
arguments over terminology. When I see an essay seeking nomenclatures for
novel practices I tend to turn off.
