Re: [PATCH -mm 5/9] netconsole: Introduce dev_status member

2007-07-05 Thread Joel Becker
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 04:38:04PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: - if (!(event == NETDEV_CHANGEADDR || event == NETDEV_CHANGENAME)) - goto done; + if (!(event == NETDEV_UP || event == NETDEV_DOWN || + event == NETDEV_CHANGEADDR || event == NETDEV_CHANGENAME)) +

Re: [PATCH -mm 8/9] netconsole: Update documentation for dynamic reconfigurability

2007-07-05 Thread Joel Becker
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 04:38:19PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: +Some examples follow (configfs is mounted at the /config mountpoint, say). configfs is generally expected to be mounted at /sys/kernel/config, and it even creates that mountpoint for itself. The documentation should

Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/9] netconsole: Multiple targets and dynamic reconfigurability

2007-07-05 Thread Joel Becker
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 05:55:15PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Keiichi KII wrote: By the way, how can I add Signed-off-by:'s to your patches? Should I add it to each patch and submit them to this list again? Anybody could give me an advice? I think you could just

[PATCH 1/2] eHEA: Capability flag for DLPAR support

2007-07-05 Thread Jan-Bernd Themann
This patch introduces a capability flag that is used by the DLPAR userspace tool to check which DLPAR features are supported by the eHEA driver. Missing goto has been included. Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/ehea/ehea.h |8 +++-

[PATCH 2/2] eHEA: Receive SKB Aggregation

2007-07-05 Thread Jan-Bernd Themann
This patch enables the receive side processing to aggregate TCP packets within the HEA device driver. It analyses the packets already received after an interrupt arrived and forwards these as chains of SKBs for the same TCP connection with modified header field. We have seen a lower CPU load and

Re: [PATCH] ACPI: export acpi events via generic netlink

2007-07-05 Thread Zhang Rui
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 14:01 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 15:45 -0400, Len Brown wrote: Thanks for including the demo program, Rui, it works for me (tm). Applied -- with the incremental patch below, which I think is correct because the only caller is bus.c, which is

Re: [PATCH 2/2] eHEA: Receive SKB Aggregation

2007-07-05 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
Hi Jan-Bernd. [ Dropped spambot/i.e. unrelated mail lists ] On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 09:26:30AM +0200, Jan-Bernd Themann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: This patch enables the receive side processing to aggregate TCP packets within the HEA device driver. It analyses the packets already received

Re: [PATCH] ACPI: export acpi events via generic netlink

2007-07-05 Thread Zhang Rui
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 10:35 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 16:24 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: I missed the discussion about the multicast issues. You don't need to reserve a family and group ID for ACPI. I'll rework this on your patches.:) I don't want to hold you, don't

Re: [PATCH] ACPI: export acpi events via generic netlink

2007-07-05 Thread Johannes Berg
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 16:24 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: I missed the discussion about the multicast issues. You don't need to reserve a family and group ID for ACPI. I'll rework this on your patches.:) I don't want to hold you, don't worry, I can handle it as well. But I don't know when these

Re: Who's allowed to set a skb destructor?

2007-07-05 Thread Andi Kleen
Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am trying to understand whether I can setup a skb destructor in my code (which is basically a protocol above dev_queue_xmit() and co). From what I see in many parts in the current kernel code, the protocol (I mean, the one who actually creates the skb)

Re: [PATCH -mm 5/9] netconsole: Introduce dev_status member

2007-07-05 Thread Satyam Sharma
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Joel Becker wrote: On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 04:38:04PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: - if (!(event == NETDEV_CHANGEADDR || event == NETDEV_CHANGENAME)) - goto done; + if (!(event == NETDEV_UP || event == NETDEV_DOWN || + event == NETDEV_CHANGEADDR ||

Re: [PATCH -mm 8/9] netconsole: Update documentation for dynamic reconfigurability

2007-07-05 Thread Satyam Sharma
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Joel Becker wrote: On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 04:38:19PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: +Some examples follow (configfs is mounted at the /config mountpoint, say). configfs is generally expected to be mounted at /sys/kernel/config, and it even creates that mountpoint for

Re: Beyond 64K TCP connections limit per IP-address

2007-07-05 Thread Robert Iakobashvili
On 7/4/07, Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:40:48 +0200 Robert Iakobashvili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/4/07, Evgeniy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 09:50:31AM +0200, Robert Iakobashvili ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: If I am correct, a

[PATCH] skbuff: remove export of static symbol

2007-07-05 Thread Johannes Berg
skb_clone_fraglist is static so it shouldn't be exported. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/core/skbuff.c |1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) --- wireless-dev.orig/net/core/skbuff.c 2007-07-05 11:30:15.265640003 +0200 +++ wireless-dev/net/core/skbuff.c 2007-07-05

[PATCH 1/2][IPV6] addrconf: fix timer deleting on exit

2007-07-05 Thread Jarek Poplawski
It looks like a timer function can be running and rearm the timer after removing a ipv6 module. Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff -Nurp 2.6.22-rc7-/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2.6.22-rc7/net/ipv6/addrconf.c --- 2.6.22-rc7-/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2007-07-02 09:03:29.0

Re: Who's allowed to set a skb destructor?

2007-07-05 Thread Divy Le Ray
Andi Kleen wrote: Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am trying to understand whether I can setup a skb destructor in my code (which is basically a protocol above dev_queue_xmit() and co). From what I see in many parts in the current kernel code, the protocol (I mean, the one who

Re: Via Rhine II Network Card Failure

2007-07-05 Thread Satyam Sharma
On 7/4/07, Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 21-06-2007 12:58, Mark Hannessen wrote: [...] SIOCSIFADDR: No such device eth0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device [...] - is eth0 shown in /proc e.g. in /proc/interrupts? - is ifconfig -a returning something? - can you

[PATCH] ps3: gigabit ethernet driver for PS3, take3

2007-07-05 Thread Masakazu Mokuno
Hi, This is the third submission of the network driver for PS3. The differences from the previous one are: - renamed source file names so that their prefix can match with the module name - added [EMAIL PROTECTED] line for MAINTAINER file - changed some in copyright comments If

[PATCH 2/2][IPV6] addrconf: fix addrconf_del_timer locking etc.

2007-07-05 Thread Jarek Poplawski
addrconf_del_timer() is sometimes done without a lock. IMHO it could be racy e.g. when between del_timer() and __in6_ifa_put() some other in6_ifa_put() is done. addrconf_dad_kick() also runs unlocked in one place. BTW, I changed a bit one printk to be more precise, I hope. PS: this patch was

Re: Who's allowed to set a skb destructor?

2007-07-05 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On 05-07-2007 12:08, Andi Kleen wrote: ... The traditional standpoint was that having your own large skb pools is not recommended because you won't interact well with the rest of the system running low on memory and you tieing up memory. Essentially you would recreate all the problems

Re: Who's allowed to set a skb destructor?

2007-07-05 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
Hi, Jarek. On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 02:28:50PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I wonder if it's very unsound to think about a one way list of destructors. Of course, not owners could only clean their private allocations. Woudn't this save some skb clonning, copying or adding

Re: Who's allowed to set a skb destructor?

2007-07-05 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:28:47PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: Hi, Jarek. On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 02:28:50PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I wonder if it's very unsound to think about a one way list of destructors. Of course, not owners could only clean their

Re: [PATCH] ixgbe: Introduce new 10GbE driver for Intel 82598 based PCI Express adapters...

2007-07-05 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 08:53:46AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 12:00:29PM -0700, Veeraiyan, Ayyappan wrote: On 7/2/07, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ayyappan Veeraiyan wrote: +#define IXGBE_TX_FLAGS_VLAN_MASK 0x +#define

Re: [PATCH -mm 8/9] netconsole: Update documentation for dynamic reconfigurability

2007-07-05 Thread Keiichi KII
Hi Satyam, + cat enabled # check if enabled is 1 + echo 0 enabled# disable the target (if required) + echo eth2 dev_name# set local interface I think that the above line should change from echo eth2 dev_name to echo -n

Re: Who's allowed to set a skb destructor?

2007-07-05 Thread Andi Kleen
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 02:28:50PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: I wonder if it's very unsound to think about a one way list of destructors. Of course, not owners could only clean their private allocations. Woudn't this save some skb clonning, copying or adding new fields for private infos?

Re: Who's allowed to set a skb destructor?

2007-07-05 Thread Andi Kleen
The destructor method is set and used for skbs originating from the RDMA driver sitting above cxgb3. If these skbs never reach the normal sockets based stack it might be ok. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: multicasting netlink messages to groups 31 from userspace

2007-07-05 Thread jamal
This email captures the essence of the thread, so let me start here. I dont know if i read well enough all the details, but i think i have a good grasp of the discusion. To just pick on mentioned issues on the thread which i picked up: - i think it is fairly usable by netlink to be used as an

Re: Who's allowed to set a skb destructor?

2007-07-05 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 03:06:40PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 02:28:50PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: I wonder if it's very unsound to think about a one way list of destructors. Of course, not owners could only clean their private allocations. Woudn't this save some

Re: [PATCH -mm 8/9] netconsole: Update documentation for dynamic reconfigurability

2007-07-05 Thread Satyam Sharma
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote: [...] BTW I did some testing myself, and have found another *embarrassing* bug: if netconsole is loaded _without_ specifying any netconsole= parameter, module is still kept loaded, but on unloading configfs_unregister_...() obviously panics! :-) This

Re: multicasting netlink messages to groups 31 from userspace

2007-07-05 Thread Patrick McHardy
Johannes Berg wrote: On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 17:00 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: Not by itself probably but a user could DoS your wireless connectivity this way. Hmm, if anything then not the connectivity but rather the MLME i.e. it won't do roaming properly maybe. Maybe we should then

Re: [PATCH -mm 8/9] netconsole: Update documentation for dynamic reconfigurability

2007-07-05 Thread Satyam Sharma
Hi Keiichi, On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Keiichi KII wrote: Hi Satyam, + cat enabled # check if enabled is 1 + echo 0 enabled # disable the target (if required) + echo eth2 dev_name # set local interface I think that the

Re: multicasting netlink messages to groups 31 from userspace

2007-07-05 Thread Patrick McHardy
jamal wrote: Looking through the code that uses NL_NONROOT_SEND I just realised that it's impossible to send multicast messages from userspace to multicast groups with IDs higher than 31. That's not really good given that everywhere else we handle multicast groups up to 2^32-1 :/ Yes, this

[PATCH net-2.6.23] UDP: Cleanup UDP encapsulation code

2007-07-05 Thread James Chapman
This cleanup fell out after adding L2TP support where a new encap_rcv funcptr was added to struct udp_sock. Have XFRM use the new encap_rcv funcptr, which allows us to move the XFRM encap code from udp.c into xfrm4_input.c. Packets discarded by the encap handler are now counted in

[no subject]

2007-07-05 Thread Bhanu Kalyan Chetlapalli
subscribe netdev - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 2/2] eHEA: Receive SKB Aggregation, generic LRO helper functions

2007-07-05 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:24:46PM +0200, Jan-Bernd Themann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I've couple of comments on the driver, but mainly the fact of decreased CPU usage itself - what was the magnitude of the win with this driver, it looks like because of per-packet receive code path

[PATCH net-2.6.23 take2] UDP: Cleanup UDP encapsulation code

2007-07-05 Thread James Chapman
This cleanup fell out after adding L2TP support where a new encap_rcv funcptr was added to struct udp_sock. Have XFRM use the new encap_rcv funcptr, which allows us to move the XFRM encap code from udp.c into xfrm4_input.c. Make xfrm4_rcv_encap() static since it is no longer called externally.

Re: [PATCH net-2.6.23 take2] UDP: Cleanup UDP encapsulation code

2007-07-05 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
Le jeudi 5 juillet 2007, vous avez écrit : James Chapman wrote: This cleanup fell out after adding L2TP support where a new encap_rcv funcptr was added to struct udp_sock. Have XFRM use the new encap_rcv funcptr, which allows us to move the XFRM encap code from udp.c into xfrm4_input.c.

Re: [PATCH net-2.6.23 take2] UDP: Cleanup UDP encapsulation code

2007-07-05 Thread Patrick McHardy
James Chapman wrote: This cleanup fell out after adding L2TP support where a new encap_rcv funcptr was added to struct udp_sock. Have XFRM use the new encap_rcv funcptr, which allows us to move the XFRM encap code from udp.c into xfrm4_input.c. Make xfrm4_rcv_encap() static since it is no

Re: [PATCH net-2.6.23 take2] UDP: Cleanup UDP encapsulation code

2007-07-05 Thread James Chapman
Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: By the way, couldn't encap_type be remove altogether (using two slightly different callbacks for ESP) from udp_sock? The notion of encap_type is needed for the setsockopt call so it would have to stay in the API. If it were removed from udp_sock, getsockopt would

Re: Splitting e1000 (Was: Re: e1000: backport ich9 support from 7.5.5 ?)

2007-07-05 Thread Kok, Auke
Kok, Auke wrote: Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 07:31:55PM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote: all the pci-express adapters that are supported are extremely similar: - they all support 2 queues - the register sets are (almost entirely) identical - there is minimal feature variance

[PATCH] tg3: Fix VLAN tag corruption

2007-07-05 Thread Matt Carlson
This patch fixes a VLAN tag corruption bug introduced in the tx batching modifications. Signed-off-by: Matt Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Michael Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff --git a/drivers/net/tg3.c b/drivers/net/tg3.c index be03cbd..cef9cbe 100644 --- a/drivers/net/tg3.c +++

Re: [PATCH 1/2][IPV6] addrconf: fix timer deleting on exit

2007-07-05 Thread David Miller
From: Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 13:12:46 +0200 It looks like a timer function can be running and rearm the timer after removing a ipv6 module. Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is completely academic as ipv6 as a module cannot be removed,

[2.6 patch] net/core/netevent.c should #include net/netevent.h

2007-07-05 Thread Adrian Bunk
Every file should include the headers containing the prototypes for its global functions. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/net/core/netevent.c.old2007-07-03 04:59:08.0 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/net/core/netevent.c2007-07-03

[PATCH] netxen: deinline and sparse fix

2007-07-05 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Get rid of dubious casts to (void *) which causes a sparse warning. And move largeish function from inline to the one file that uses the code, the compiler can then decide to inline it. Compile tested only. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic.h

[RFC 0/2] Convert skb to use scatterlist

2007-07-05 Thread Stephen Hemminger
This topic came up at first Netconf. This patch changes skbuff to use scatterlist. Why? Devices can than use the pci_dma_sg routines to map the fraglist in one operation. This allows for better error handling (less unwinding), and some IOMMU's (PPC?) can be smarter. -- Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL

[RFC 2/2] shrink size of scatterlist on common i386/x86-64

2007-07-05 Thread Stephen Hemminger
The scatterlist only needs 16 bits for length/offset because PAGE_SIZE is 4K Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- a/include/asm-i386/scatterlist.h2007-07-05 14:37:11.0 -0700 +++ b/include/asm-i386/scatterlist.h2007-07-05 15:44:51.0 -0700 @@ -5,9 +5,9 @@

Re: [RFC 2/2] shrink size of scatterlist on common i386/x86-64

2007-07-05 Thread David Miller
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:14:14 -0700 The scatterlist only needs 16 bits for length/offset because PAGE_SIZE is 4K Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unfortunately I don't think this can be done, even on i386. It is legal to use

Re: [RFC 2/2] shrink size of scatterlist on common i386/x86-64

2007-07-05 Thread Roland Dreier
--- a/include/asm-i386/scatterlist.h 2007-07-05 14:37:11.0 -0700 +++ b/include/asm-i386/scatterlist.h 2007-07-05 15:44:51.0 -0700 @@ -5,9 +5,9 @@ struct scatterlist { struct page *page; -unsigned intoffset; dma_addr_t

Re: [PATCH] ixgbe: Introduce new 10GbE driver for Intel 82598 based PCI Express adapters...

2007-07-05 Thread Jeff Garzik
Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote: On Tuesday 03 July 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote: Access to bitfields are not atomic within the machine int in which they are stored... you need to unpack the values stored in bitfields, even if they are single-bit bitfields. Which we do

Re: Splitting e1000 (Was: Re: e1000: backport ich9 support from 7.5.5 ?)

2007-07-05 Thread Jeff Garzik
Kok, Auke wrote: 1a) We post an e1000e driver that implements support for all 8257x (ich8/9, es2lan etc) devices. 1b) We post a patch that drops support for all of these devices in the form of a pci-ID removal (no code removed) for e1000. 2) we post patches that remove code support for

[PATCH] tg3: Tx availability fix

2007-07-05 Thread Matt Carlson
This patch changes how and to what value the xmit_win variable is assigned. The patch starts by correcting the initialization of xmit_win to be 1/4 the value of tx_pending rather than the tx ring size. The tx_pending value is initialized to be the tx ring size, but it may be changed through

Re: [PATCH net-2.6.23 take2] UDP: Cleanup UDP encapsulation code

2007-07-05 Thread David Miller
From: Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:45:02 +0200 James Chapman wrote: This cleanup fell out after adding L2TP support where a new encap_rcv funcptr was added to struct udp_sock. Have XFRM use the new encap_rcv funcptr, which allows us to move the XFRM encap

Re: [2.6 patch] net/core/netevent.c should #include net/netevent.h

2007-07-05 Thread David Miller
From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 01:22:17 +0200 Every file should include the headers containing the prototypes for its global functions. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Applied, thanks Adrian. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: [RFC 2/2] shrink size of scatterlist on common i386/x86-64

2007-07-05 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:43:08 -0700 (PDT) David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:14:14 -0700 The scatterlist only needs 16 bits for length/offset because PAGE_SIZE is 4K Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] IPV6: Call inet6addr_chain notifiers on link down

2007-07-05 Thread David Miller
From: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:57:32 -0400 Currently if the link is brought down via ip link or ifconfig down, the inet6addr_chain notifiers are not called even though all the addresses are removed from the interface. This caused SCTP to add duplicate

Re: [PATCH] skbuff: remove export of static symbol

2007-07-05 Thread David Miller
From: Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 11:33:01 +0200 skb_clone_fraglist is static so it shouldn't be exported. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Patch applied, thanks! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a

Re: [RFC 2/2] shrink size of scatterlist on common i386/x86-64

2007-07-05 Thread David Miller
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 17:00:51 -0700 On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:43:08 -0700 (PDT) David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:14:14 -0700 The scatterlist only needs 16 bits for

-ENOCOMPILE

2007-07-05 Thread David Miller
Vlad, you're on my shit list for the next week for submitting a patch to the 2.6.22 tree which won't even compile: net/ipv6/addrconf.c: In function $,1rx(Baddrconf_ifdown$,1ry(B: net/ipv6/addrconf.c:2475: error: $,1rx(Bifp$,1ry(B undeclared (first use in this function)

[PATCH v2] tg3: Tx availability fix

2007-07-05 Thread Matt Carlson
Ugh. Please disregard the previous version and use this one instead. The original patch had a compiler warning. This patch changes how and to what value the xmit_win variable is assigned. The patch starts by correcting the initialization of xmit_win to be 1/4 the value of

Re:

2007-07-05 Thread pradeep singh
On 7/5/07, Bhanu Kalyan Chetlapalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: subscribe netdev oops perhaps you need to send it to majordomo :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re:

2007-07-05 Thread Bhanu Kalyan Chetlapalli
On 7/6/07, pradeep singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/5/07, Bhanu Kalyan Chetlapalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: subscribe netdev oops perhaps you need to send it to majordomo :-) Sorry about that, I just copied the wrong address, and realized it immediately after (as it often happens for me)

Re: [PATCH 1/2][IPV6] addrconf: fix timer deleting on exit

2007-07-05 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 02:37:40PM -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 13:12:46 +0200 It looks like a timer function can be running and rearm the timer after removing a ipv6 module. Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL