David S. Miller wrote:
From: John Ronciak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 11:48:46 -0800
Copybreak probably shouldn't be used in routing use cases.
I think even this is arguable, routers route a lot more than
small 64-byte frames. Unfortunately, that is what everyone
uses for packet
I find the no toe, no way attitude strange.
I've seen a number of server applications that:
a] move a lot of data over TCP.. let's say around 1 Gbps over a hundred
concurrent flows.
b] spend a significant amount of cycles in the kernel stack doing this.
c] spend the rest of their cycles doing
