Re: [PATCH] fs_enet: Don't call phy_mii_ioctl() in atomic context.

Scott Wood wrote: The lock acquisition in fs_ioctl() does not appear to actually be necessary, and thus is simply removed. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This fixes the following bug: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/051564.html

[PATCH] fs_enet: Don't call phy_mii_ioctl() in atomic context.

The lock acquisition in fs_ioctl() does not appear to actually be necessary, and thus is simply removed. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This fixes the following bug: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/051564.html drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c |7

RE: [PATCH] fs_enet: Don't call phy_mii_ioctl() in atomic context.

Scott Wood wrote: The lock acquisition in fs_ioctl() does not appear to actually be necessary, and thus is simply removed. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This fixes the following bug: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/051564.html