These two functions are the same except for what they call
to check_established and hash for a socket.
This saves half-a-kilo for ipv4 and ipv6.
add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 1/4 up/down: 582/-1128 (-546)
function old new delta
__inet_hash_connect
Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:32:09PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu:
These two functions are the same except for what they call
to check_established and hash for a socket.
This saves half-a-kilo for ipv4 and ipv6.
Good stuff!
Yesterday I was perusing tcp_hash and I think we could have the
From: Pavel Emelyanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:32:09 +0300
These two functions are the same except for what they call
to check_established and hash for a socket.
This saves half-a-kilo for ipv4 and ipv6.
add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 1/4 up/down: 582/-1128 (-546)
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:01:53 -0200
Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:32:09PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu:
These two functions are the same except for what they call
to check_established and hash for a socket.
This saves half-a-kilo for
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:32:09PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu:
These two functions are the same except for what they call
to check_established and hash for a socket.
This saves half-a-kilo for ipv4 and ipv6.
Good stuff!
Yesterday I was perusing
Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:18:51PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu:
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:32:09PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu:
These two functions are the same except for what they call
to check_established and hash for a socket.
This saves
Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:39:55AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:18:51PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu:
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:32:09PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu:
These two functions are the same except for
