On 05/13/2016 11:21 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Ben Greear
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 09:57:19 -0700
How do you feel about a new socket-option to allow a socket to
request the old veth behaviour?
I depend upon the opinions of the experts who work upstream on and
maintain these components, sinc
From: Ben Greear
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 09:57:19 -0700
> How do you feel about a new socket-option to allow a socket to
> request the old veth behaviour?
I depend upon the opinions of the experts who work upstream on and
maintain these components, since it is an area I am not so familiar
with.
Mr Miller:
How do you feel about a new socket-option to allow a socket to
request the old veth behaviour?
Thanks,
Ben
On 04/30/2016 10:30 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 03:43:51PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/30/2016 03:01 PM, Vijay Pandurangan wrote:
Consider:
- App A
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 03:43:51PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 04/30/2016 03:01 PM, Vijay Pandurangan wrote:
> > Consider:
> >
> > - App A sends out corrupt packets 50% of the time and discards inbound
> > data.
(...)
> How can you make a generic app C know how to do this? The path could be,
