On (06/01/17 22:34), Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > + np = >hash_buckets[hash_val];
> > + while ((n = rcu_dereference_protected(*np,
> > + lockdep_is_held(>lock))) != NULL) {
>
> checkpatch shows some warnings:
>
> scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict /tmp/file.patch
Hello,
On Wed, 31 May 2017, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> The command
> # arp -s 62.2.0.1 a:b:c:d:e:f dev eth2
> adds an entry like the following (listed by "arp -an")
> ? (62.2.0.1) at 0a:0b:0c:0d:0e:0f [ether] PERM on eth2
> but the symmetric deletion command
> # arp -i eth2 -d
The command
# arp -s 62.2.0.1 a:b:c:d:e:f dev eth2
adds an entry like the following (listed by "arp -an")
? (62.2.0.1) at 0a:0b:0c:0d:0e:0f [ether] PERM on eth2
but the symmetric deletion command
# arp -i eth2 -d 62.2.0.1
does not remove the PERM entry from the table, and instead leaves
