I expect that softmac should be listening to the driver as to whether this
capability is available;
however, I'm now up and running once again.
Yeah, I think a patch was floating around too!
johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 10:31 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
Do you mean a special dump, or is the kernel debug output and wpa_supplicant
debug output sufficient?
I was thinking of packet dumps but earlier you said you couldn't create
any so I'm out of ideas for now.
I was
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 13:12 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
(ie, add the hh before the x to tell the print that it's a char)
That doesn't work - the result is
%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx%hx
Looks like the kernel doesn't support that modifier.
I
Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 13:12 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
but why doesn't it work?
No idea. If we had a dump maybe we could tell :/
Do you mean a special dump, or is the kernel debug output and wpa_supplicant
debug output sufficient?
Larry
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 10:31 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
Do you mean a special dump, or is the kernel debug output and wpa_supplicant
debug output sufficient?
I was thinking of packet dumps but earlier you said you couldn't create
any so I'm out of ideas for now.
johannes
signature.asc
Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 10:31 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
Do you mean a special dump, or is the kernel debug output and wpa_supplicant
debug output sufficient?
I was thinking of packet dumps but earlier you said you couldn't create
any so I'm out of ideas for now.
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 14:24 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
Jun 6 13:34:10 larrylap kernel: SoftMAC: generic IE set to
ffdd160050fff2010150fff2020150fff2020150fff202
Why does SoftMAC set a generic IE rather than get one from wpa_supplicant? I
would appreciate
Johannes Berg wrote:
generic IE is what the wext is called, it is the IE that wpa_supplicant
sets. Not sure what's going on though, I know next to nothing about wpa.
I have a little more information on what is happening. In IEEE Std 802.11i-2004, which defines the
WPA protocol, Figure 11a
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 10:47 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
I have a little more information on what is happening.
Great.
In IEEE Std 802.11i-2004, which defines the
WPA protocol, Figure 11a shows the sequence of exchanges needed to associate.
Both bcm43xx-softmac
and ndiswrapper go through
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 17:51 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
Well, it should be shown in the 802.11i spec too.
I suppose that it is the association request, and needs to contain the
RSN described in 7.3.2.25 as per 7.2.3.4 in 802.11i. This is, afaik, the
'generic IE' that is added with the wext.
Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 10:47 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
I have a little more information on what is happening.
Great.
In IEEE Std 802.11i-2004, which defines the
WPA protocol, Figure 11a shows the sequence of exchanges needed to
associate. Both bcm43xx-softmac
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 09:01 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
Beware of the order of IE's in the management frames; some AP's are
touchy about this.
Uh oh. I have no idea where the ieee80211 layer sticks that one,
probably at the end.
johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Sam Leffler wrote:
Beware of the order of IE's in the management frames; some AP's are
touchy about this.
That may be the cause here as the behavior when I changed AP's from the Linux-based model to one
with VXWorks.
Larry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 09:01 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
Beware of the order of IE's in the management frames; some AP's are
touchy about this.
Uh oh. I have no idea where the ieee80211 layer sticks that one,
probably at the end.
I can verify that. I'm currently building
Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 09:01 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
Beware of the order of IE's in the management frames; some AP's are
touchy about this.
Uh oh. I have no idea where the ieee80211 layer sticks that one,
probably at the end.
I moved the WPA IE from the end forward
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 17:57 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 17:51 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
Well, it should be shown in the 802.11i spec too.
I suppose that it is the association request, and needs to contain the
RSN described in 7.3.2.25 as per 7.2.3.4 in 802.11i.
Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 17:57 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 17:51 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
Well, it should be shown in the 802.11i spec too.
I suppose that it is the association request, and needs to contain the
RSN described in 7.3.2.25 as per
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 13:12 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
Dan Williams wrote:
from ieee80211softmac_wx.c: ieee80211softmac_wx_set_genie()
memcpy(mac-wpa.IE, extra, wrqu-data.length);
dprintk(KERN_INFO PFX generic IE set to );
for
Dan Williams wrote:
Weird, does the kernel not do something that fprintf() _does_ do here?
I tested with a short C program that mimics the behavior of this chunk
of code, and %.2x didn't work, but %.2hhx certainly did. hh is
supposed to mean A following integer conversion corresponds to a
Since my Linksys WRT54G V1 died and was replaced with a V5 (Yes, I know it was a mistake.), I have
been unable to authenticate using WPA-PSK TKIP with bcm43xx-softmac. I'm sure that my wpa_supplicant
setup is OK as it has not been changed since the AP was changed, and the system works if I use
20 matches
Mail list logo
