On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 12:45:50PM -0800, Ulrich Drepper ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
Why do we want to inject _ready_ event, when it is possible to mark
event as ready and wakeup thread parked in syscall?
Going back to this old one:
How do you want to mark an
From: Heiko Carstens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[patch] qeth: fix uaccess handling and get rid of unused variable
drivers/s390/net/qeth_main.c: In function `qeth_process_inbound_buffer':
drivers/s390/net/qeth_main.c:2563: warning: unused variable `vlan_addr'
include/asm/uaccess.h: In function
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 08:16:10AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
...
The system hangs and does not recover (well, a few processes
continue on the other processor for a few minutes before they
too deadlock...)
I am guessing this problem has been around for a while, but it
is only triggered when
On 22-12-2006 15:28, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
hi,
while running my usual stuff on 2.6.20-rc1-git5, sfuzz
(http://www.digitaldwarf.be/products/sfuzz.c)
did the following, to produce the lockdep warning below:
...
Here is the stacktrace:
[ 313.239556]
* Evgeniy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Generic event handling mechanism.
i see it covers alot of event sources, but i cannot see block IO
notifications. Am i missing something?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to
* Evgeniy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Generic event handling mechanism.
it would be /very/ helpful to state against which kernel tree the
patch-queue is. It does not apply to 2.6.20-rc1 nor to -rc2 nor to
2.6.19. At which point i gave up ...
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this
Great! At last glance, only gianfar, fs_enet, and au1000_eth. There
are one or two others that haven't gone in, yet. My hope is that
your changes will not require any changes to the drivers, but I'll
leave that to your discretion.
Unfortunately, it will probably have an impact on
Re-sending as a plain text to reach netdev.
Sorry for the extra traffic, please ignore the earlier html version of
this e-mail...
Jeff/Roland/all,
What is the preferred submission driver model for an iWARP-capable
Ethernet NIC -
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc2 compared to 2.6.19
with patches available
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc2 compared to 2.6.19.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way possibly
On Dec 21, 2006, at 22:07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Hi Andy !
I've been looking at porting various drivers (EMAC, sungem,
spider_net, ...) to the generic PHY stuff. However, I have one
significant problem here.
One of the things I've been trying to do lately with EMAC and that I
plan to
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, jamal wrote:
On Wed, 2006-27-12 at 09:09 +0200, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
My scenario is treatment of RTP packets in kernel space with a single network
card (both Rx and Tx). The default of the Intel 5000 series chipset is
affinity of each
network card to a certain
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:07:24 +1100
tg3 says
tg3: eth0: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full duplex.
tg3: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX.
but sungem says
eth0: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full-duplex.
eth0: Pause is disabled
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:44:12 +1100
I stumbled accross what might be a bug on out of order architecture:
netif_poll_enable() only does a clear_bit(). However,
netif_poll_disable/enable pairs are often used as simili-spinlocks.
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 21:09 -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:44:12 +1100
I stumbled accross what might be a bug on out of order architecture:
netif_poll_enable() only does a clear_bit(). However,
Hello,
I fixed the compile issue when we configure IPv6 as a module.
[1/3] exporting xfrm_state_afinfo
[2/3] supporting IPv6 over IPv4 IPsec
[3/3] supporting IPv4 over IPv6 IPsec
These patches can be applied to linux-2.6.20-rc2.
Thank you,
--
Kazunori Miyazawa
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
This is the patch to support IPv4 over IPv6 IPsec.
Signed-off-by: Miika Komu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Diego Beltrami [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Kazunori Miyazawa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
index fb9f69c..011136a 100644
---
This patch exports xfrm_state_afinfo.
Signed-off-by: Miika Komu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Diego Beltrami [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Kazunori Miyazawa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
index e476541..bf91d63 100644
--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++
This is the patch to support IPv6 over IPv4 IPsec
Signed-off-by: Miika Komu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Diego Beltrami [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Kazunori Miyazawa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_mode_tunnel.c b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_mode_tunnel.c
index e23c21d..e54c549 100644
19 matches
Mail list logo
