David S. Miller wrote:
From: Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 02:51:40 +0100
I have noticed this warnings
TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer 82.113.55.2:11759/50967 shrinks window
148470938:148470943. Repaired.
TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer 82.113.55.2:11759/50967 shrinks
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 04:57:11PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 22:37:08 +0200
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 01:06:02PM +1100, Peter Chubb wrote:
I see lots of
kernel unaligned access to 0xa001009dbb6f,
This patch makes the needlessly global rhine_set_carrier() static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 4 Apr 2006
--- linux-2.6.17-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/net/via-rhine.c.old 2006-04-04
17:41:16.0 +0200
+++
This patch removes the unused EXPORT_SYMBOL(secure_ipv6_port_ephemeral).
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 5 Apr 2006
--- linux-2.6.17-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/char/random.c.old 2006-04-05
17:00:04.0 +0200
+++
Andy Furniss wrote:
David S. Miller wrote:
From: Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 02:51:40 +0100
I have noticed this warnings
TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer 82.113.55.2:11759/50967 shrinks window
148470938:148470943. Repaired.
TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 05:58:22PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch removes the unused EXPORT_SYMBOL(secure_ipv6_port_ephemeral).
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adrian appears to be correct that this doesn't break modular ipv6.
--
Thanks for the help.
Here is the makefile:
http://rafb.net/paste/results/auchPH75.html
And here is the full errors I receive:
http://rafb.net/paste/results/Qplpqw74.html
Greatly appreciate it
- George
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006 19:18:47 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
Yeah, this module is
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 19:21:40 +0200 Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
Hi,
I'm running Gentoo Linux, a 2.6.16-ck kernel, and udev-0.89-r2, and
have had hard time with network interfaces renaming through udev
rules. The first thing i've tried were rules like this one:
SUBSYSTEM==net,
This patch contains the overdue removal of ip{,6}_queue.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 12
Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt |1
include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_queue.h| 72 --
include/linux/netlink.h
Herbert Xu wrote:
jamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that the broadcast ARP is still valid for any address configured
as a link local addresses to be done in the kernel - for those reasons
described in the RFC (which i didnt find very convincing, but other
people felt strongly about and
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 13:37:25 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
Thanks for the help.
Here is the makefile: http://rafb.net/paste/results/auchPH75.html
And here is the full errors I receive:
http://rafb.net/paste/results/Qplpqw74.html
Greatly appreciate it
- George
[repeat:
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 14:15:32 -0700 (PDT),
David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if this will cause other problems by invoked scripts
seeing the state not advanced yet?
I don't know.
An other way would be to allow reading 'address' also when device is
in NETREG_REGISTERING
Hi,
meanwhile I gathered some information from /proc/net/tcp6 on this
problem - in case anyone is interested :-)
| 1144560959: 8: :1223
:1A0B 01 : 02:00097F82
10000 3188619 8 c1409260 89 10 20 2
I've started creating a new Prism2/2.5/3 driver for the Devicescape
802.11 stack based on the Host AP driver. This allows access point mode
to be tested with the current net/d80211 code in wireless-dev.git
(requires hostapd snapshot from the development branch) and eventually,
will be an example
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 22:05:33 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 13:37:25 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
Thanks for the help.
Here is the makefile: http://rafb.net/paste/results/auchPH75.html
And here is the full errors I receive:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 04:23:47AM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
When I am back home, I will continue at the bcm43xx AP stuff.
Shouldn't be too hard to get it working, actually.
So, there we will have another driver for testing AP mode.
Yes, indeed. As far as I can tell, the main issue is in
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 22:05:33 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 13:37:25 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
Thanks for the help.
Here is the makefile: http://rafb.net/paste/results/auchPH75.html
And here is the full errors I receive:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 22:49:50 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 22:05:33 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 13:37:25 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
Thanks for the help.
Here is the makefile: http://rafb.net/paste/results/auchPH75.html
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 22:49:50 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 22:05:33 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 13:37:25 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
Thanks for the help.
Here is the makefile:
http://rafb.net/paste/results/auchPH75.html
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 23:20:01 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 22:49:50 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 22:05:33 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 13:37:25 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
Thanks for the help.
Since the driver already sets the correct dma_mask, there is no reason
to bail there. In fact if you have an iommu, I think you can have a
address above 1G which will be ok for the device (if it isn't true then
the powerpc dma_alloc_coherent with iommu needs to be fixed because it
doesn't respect
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:07:32AM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Monday 10 April 2006 06:01, you wrote:
Since the driver already sets the correct dma_mask, there is no reason
to bail there. In fact if you have an iommu, I think you can have a
address above 1G which will be ok for the
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 08:29:12PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 23:20:01 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 22:49:50 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 22:05:33 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:28:00AM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Monday 10 April 2006 06:22, you wrote:
Either the ppc code is wrong (it doesn't enforce dma_mask) either the
driver still works without the check.
Maybe ppc should do the same thing as i386:
47 if (dev ==
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 02:39:54AM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c
index 6c969f4..006a7d4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c
+++
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 23:20:01 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 22:49:50 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 22:05:33 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis wrote:
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 13:37:25 -0400 (EDT) George P Nychis
wrote:
Thanks for the help.
From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:47:23 +1000
BTW, for some reason none of your posts seem to be turning up on
netdev. The last message from you that I received through netdev
was dated the 15th of Mrach.
The reason is that the string interg*enia is in our filters
From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 17:58:22 +0200
This patch removes the unused EXPORT_SYMBOL(secure_ipv6_port_ephemeral).
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied, thanks Adrian.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body
From: Thomas de Grenier de Latour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 01:33:33 +0200
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 14:15:32 -0700 (PDT),
David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if this will cause other problems by invoked scripts
seeing the state not advanced yet?
I don't
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 11:32:50 -0700
Begin forwarded message:
...
Lapbether generate an oops, when I try to receive or sends packets over X25.
I think that the problem was introduced by this patch:
From: Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 13:58:10 +0200
Patrick McHardy wrote:
Please try if this patch helps.
+ .hooks = 1 NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING || 1 NF_IP_LOCAL_OUT,
I shouldn't send patches before getting out of bed .. :)
Please try this one
From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 13:46:25 +1000
David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Zach Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 16:59:01 -0700
b) Just calculate the hashes under the lock, we're already doing lots of
work there anyway.
I
32 matches
Mail list logo
