From: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
About a dozen drivers that have some form of crc checksumming or offloading
use this constant, warranting a global define for it.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/if_ether.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions
a lot better.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 32 +++-
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
a lot better. All #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI's have been removed.
Compile tested with both CONFIG_PCI_MSI enabled and disabled.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h |4 +---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 39
Our 82571 (first PCI-E hardware) causes P-Series hardware to throw
issues. Disabling PCI-E completion timeouts in our NIC resolves
the issue.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Wen Xiong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 10 ++
1 files changed, 10
From: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pci_enable_msi calls can fail for normal operational reasons. Driver
should not print an error message in that case. Fix a leak that leaves
msi enabled if pci_request_irq fails. We can remove CONFIG_PCI_MSI
ifdefs alltogether
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL
to netif_poll_enable is in e1000_up() which is only
reached after a device reset or resume.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c |4
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b
to netif_poll_enable is in e1000_up() which is only
reached after a device reset or resume.
Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8455
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240339
Tested by Doug Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Herbert Xu
it to be.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Doug Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 11 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
the msg_enable member
of the net_device struct. (3) Ethtool code can just modify the
net_device msg_enable for drivers that do not have custom
msg_enable get/set handlers so converted drivers lose some
code for that as well.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/netdevice.h
With the generic ndev_printk macros, we can now convert network
drivers to use this generic printk family for netdevices.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/e100.c| 121 +++--
drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h | 15
the msg_enable member
of the net_device struct. (3) Ethtool code can just modify the
net_device msg_enable for drivers that do not have custom
msg_enable get/set handlers so converted drivers lose some
code for that as well.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/netdevice.h
With the generic ndev_printk macros, we can now convert network
drivers to use this generic printk family for netdevices.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/e100.c| 135 -
drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h | 15
.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 54 +
net/core/dev.c|5
net/core/ethtool.c| 14 ++--
3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux
Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Kok, Auke wrote:
Deprecate mii-tool SIOCMIIREG ioctl. This ioctl is broken in e1000
and ethtool has this functionality in working order.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This doesn't deprecated
699a71238856b19091503c671bac8abb1e3f9a3a)
Cheers,
Auke
Kok, Auke wrote:
Vasily Averin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e1000: IRQ resources cleanup
e1000: e1000_probe resources cleanup
e1000: ring buffers resources cleanup
Jesse Brandeburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e1000: unify WoL capability
e1000: Typo fix.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/e1000.c b/e1000.c
index 6de27ca..6741323 100644
--- a/e1000.c
+++ b/e1000.c
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ e1000_dump_regs(struct ethtool_drvinfo *
Descriptor minimum threshold size: %s\n
Broadcast accept mode
Paul Aviles wrote:
I am getting e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang
using stock 2.6.17.11, 2.6.17.5 or 2.6.17.4 kernels on centos 4.3.
The server is a Tyan GS10 and is connected to a Netgear GS724T Gig
switch. I can easily reproduce the problem by trying to do a large ftp
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
we have a couple of industrial PCs here with Intel PRO/100 controllers
on board. Most of them work fine with the e100, but today I stumbled
over one box that doesn't: Reception works (RX counter increases, ARP
cache gets filled up), but transmission fails (TX counter is
Shaw Vrana wrote:
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I have a question about the use of the tx_ring-next_to_use variable in
the e1000. Specifically, I'm wondering about a race between the use of
next_to_use in e1000_xmit_frame and the clearing of
From: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
e1000.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/e1000.c b/e1000.c
index 6de27ca..6741323 100644
--- a/e1000.c
+++ b/e1000.c
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ e1000_dump_regs(struct ethtool_drvinfo
registers for read and write
descriptor rings. Ths fix was tested on an 82542 rev3 NIC and newer NICs.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
index 726f43d..98ef9f8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
+++ b
Francois Romieu wrote:
Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
What are good examples of simple/basic ethernet drivers one should
use to model a new driver off of?
tg3/bnx2/sky2/b44/8139cp
Can I add e1000/ixgb to that? ;)
Cheers,
Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 13, 2006, at 3:11 PM, Auke Kok wrote:
Francois Romieu wrote:
Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
What are good examples of simple/basic ethernet drivers one should
use to model a new driver off of?
tg3/bnx2/sky2/b44/8139cp
Can I add e1000/ixgb to that? ;)
What
is no longer enabled. This is
a trivial fix for this problem. Tested.
Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
drivers/net/e100.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: linux-2.6.18-rc7-git1
From: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
e1000.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/e1000.c b/e1000.c
index 6de27ca..6741323 100644
--- a/e1000.c
+++ b/e1000.c
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ e1000_dump_regs(struct ethtool_drvinfo
From: Nicholas Nunley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This adds support for dumping ixgb registers in readable format.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Nunley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Makefile.am|4 +-
ethtool-util.h |3 +
ethtool.c |2 +
ixgb.c
is not set, which
was previously broken.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why does e100_suspend() need to exist even when CONFIG_PM is disabled?
WoL is fundamentally power management.
same as e1000_suspend: we're consolidating shutdown code making 2 different
codepaths exactly
6a9516989f94df10d9a27ba543c6b53b3e69c84a).
This commit reverts commit 673a052fde79ab5e9dce569b0336358812ddba2d and
re-enables 82542rev3 chips completely.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
null patch
hmm, it should look like this:
---
e1000: revert 'e1000
Jeff Garzik wrote:
FYI, note that I killed some OS wrappers from osdep.h in e1000 and ixgb
excellent, I am ashamed I didn't get to that myself yet :)
Thanks!
Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
is not set, which
was previously broken.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why does e100_suspend() need to exist even when CONFIG_PM is disabled?
WoL is fundamentally power management.
okay, I'll fix this for e1000 as well, where we have the same code flow.
Thanks.
Auke
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Kok, Auke wrote:
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.h
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.h
@@ -90,15 +90,6 @@ typedef enum {
e1000_100_full = 3
} e1000_speed_duplex_type;
-/* Flow Control Settings */
-typedef enum {
-e1000_fc_none = 0,
-e1000_fc_rx_pause = 1,
-
Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:40:34PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:28:38AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
+ add_taint(TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK);
I object to this flag being abused this way.
A corrupt EEPROM on
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Kok, Auke wrote:
Refine cb cleaning debug printout and print out all cleaned cbs'
status. Add
debug flag for EEPROM csum failures that were overridden by the user.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACK patch, NAK
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:45:06 -0400
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
looks OK except for the tasklet, which may starve if the lock is being
held upon entry
Why would the tasklet starve anymore than NAPI?
Worst case, the transmitters fill the ring completely and
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Actually, I rescind the ACK.
The code should be inside a spinlock, and therefore not need this
additional check.
If this check were truly needed, then SMP code all over the kernel would
be broken.
I will drop the patch for now. Once Jesse is back next week he gets to
Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 10 +++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
index e81aa03..2ecec51 100644
--- a/drivers/net
: account for NET_IP_ALIGN when calculating bufsiz
Account for NET_IP_ALIGN when requesting buffer sizes from netdev_alloc_skb to
reduce slab allocation by half.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
index bb0d129
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 22:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:50:00 -0700
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:10:36 -0700
Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
e1000: account for NET_IP_ALIGN when
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 10:33:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
The NET_IP_ALIGN existed not just for fun :) There are ramifications
for removing it.
It's still there, isn't it?
For the 9k MTU case, for example, we end up allocating 16384 byte skbs
Amol Lad wrote:
ioremap must be balanced by an iounmap and failing to do so can result
in a memory leak.
Tested (compilation only) with:
- allmodconfig
- Modifying drivers/net/Kconfig to make sure that the changed file is
compiling without warning
Signed-off-by: Amol Lad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Linas Vepstas wrote:
Resending a minor janitorial patch from long ago that seems to have
fallen through the cracks. Its not in 2.6.18-git4 nor in 2.6.18-mm1.
Please apply and forward upstream.
--linas
[PATCH]: e1000: Janitor: Use #defined values for literals
Minor janitorial patch: use
and rx_new) and uses kzalloc instead kmalloc+memset(0)
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jeb Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: John Ronciak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jeff Kirsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL
David Acker wrote:
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:55:34 -0400
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
The mii-tool utility seems to be abandoned and unmaintained?
Here is a version that does standard 1000baseT support.
Rick Jones wrote:
With mii-tool we can do the command below and work with a half duplex
hub and a full duplex switch.
mii-tool -A 10baseT-FD,10baseT-HD eth0
Why, and how often, is that really necessary?
This is a bit of a hypothetical discussion of course, but I can imagine a lot
of users
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Rick Jones wrote:
Another scenario: forcing the NIC to negotiate only full-duplex speeds. Not
only fun if you try it against a hub, but possibly useful.
[...]
I'm just worried (as in Fear Uncertainty and Doubt) that having people set the
allowed
dean gaudet wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
The mii-tool utility seems to be abandoned and unmaintained?
Here is a version that does standard 1000baseT support.
http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/prototypes/mii-tool.tar.bz2
Not really. I
: Jeff Kirsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Several hardware bits were set all over the driver and have been
consolidated into a single function.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.c | 155
-by: Mitch Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c | 32 ++--
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.h |4 +++-
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c|9 -
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions
files changed, 1108 insertions(+), 1488 deletions(-)
---
Summary:
---
Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
e100, e1000, ixgb: update copyright header and remove LICENSE
e100, e1000, ixgb: Fix an impossible memory overwrite bug
e1000: keep .suspend and .resume driver methods in CONFIG_PM
Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
I am unable to get networking to work with 2.6.18-mm1 on my system.
But 2.6.18 kernel on same system works fine. Here is some info about
the system/debug attempts. Attached are the lspci output and config.
Appreciate any help. Please let me know if you need more
Andrew Morton wrote:
Enable netconsole-over-e100, and `reboot -f' hangs. Disabling netconsole
prevents that from happening.
I assume what's happening is that the driver gets shut down and then
something tries to do a printk through it, and things hang.
For some reason sysrq-B still reboots
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
There is no reason to not allow non-admin users to query network
statistics and settings.
--- linux-2.6.orig/net/core/ethtool.c
+++ linux-2.6/net/core/ethtool.c
@@ -806,13 +806,6 @@ int dev_ethtool(struct ifreq *ifr)
int rc;
unsigned long old_features;
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Auke Kok wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
Delete the minimally-useful IXGB_DBG() macro and call pr_debug()
directly from the main routine.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb.h b/drivers/net/ixgb
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Auke Kok wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
... snip ...
if someone wants to tell me what, in the context of ixgb_main.c,
i would use as that dev argument [for dev_dbg], i'm all for
that.
(CC netdev since it's a network driver topic).
all our
://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
For the e1000 parts, but in general too:
Acked-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
e100: FIX: fix netconsole fast reboot attached to e100
When rebooting with netconsole over e100, the driver shutdown code
would deadlock with netpoll. Reduce shutdown code to a bare minimum
while retaining WoL and suspend functionality.
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off
jamal wrote:
On Mon, 2006-16-10 at 11:55 -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
jamal wrote:
I think when the e1000 says via ethtool rx is on - it means that it
is _advertising_ flow control as opposed to detecting partner has flow
control capability.
Auke, can you also check this as well?
Just found
jamal wrote:
On Mon, 2006-16-10 at 11:55 -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
jamal wrote:
I think when the e1000 says via ethtool rx is on - it means that it
is _advertising_ flow control as opposed to detecting partner has flow
control capability.
Auke, can you also check this as well?
Just found
jamal wrote:
On Tue, 2006-17-10 at 14:02 -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
For now, we should really report the FC status in e1000 at link up time. Jamal: this
should help you out for now, I'll send something like this upstream later on.
Thanks - this puts you at par with the tg3 at least.
On Tue
Yan Burman wrote:
Replace kmalloc+memset with kcalloc
ACK, fine with me.
Signed-off-by: Yan Burman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -rubp linux-2.6.19-rc5_orig/drivers/net/e100.c
linux-2.6.19-rc5_kzalloc/drivers/net/e100.c
--- linux-2.6.19-rc5_orig/drivers/net/e100.c2006-11-09 12:16:21.0
insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev
quad
port adapter (device 0x10a5). MTU changes on a downed interface require
a phy commit to enact the new size immediately.
Signed-off-by: Jeb Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/e1000/Makefile
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:36:29 -0800
Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew, All,
This patch contains a major rewrite to the e1000 driver that groups and separates e1000
hardware by chipset family. It abstracts the hardware specific code into an API that
will allow
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:36:29 -0800
Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
git-pull git://lost.foo-projects.org/~ahkok/git/linux-2.6 e1000
That tree appears to be based on the -mm git tree?
That's a somewhat unusual thing to do - a tree which is based on current
Linus
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:16:27 +0100 Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
drivers/net/e1000/Makefile| 19
drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h | 95
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.c | 1330 +
drivers/net/e1000
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:36:29 -0800
Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
git-pull git://lost.foo-projects.org/~ahkok/git/linux-2.6 e1000
That tree appears to be based on the -mm git tree?
That's a somewhat unusual thing to do - a tree which is based on current
Linus
know if this also fixes the problem for you. I will most likely push this
patch to the netdev tree in any case.
Cheers,
Auke
---
From: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e1000: Don't do PHY reads in watchdog unless link status is down
The watchdog runs code that every 2 seconds performs several PHY
Mark Ryden wrote:
Hello,
I have a machine with 2 dual core CPUs. This machine runs Fedora Core 6.
I have two Intel e1000 GigaBit network cards on this machine; I use
bonding so
that the machine assigns the same IP address to both NICs ;
It seems to me that bonding is configured OK, bacuse
Harry Coin wrote:
Hello from Iowa.
Below please find a fix to the Wake On Lan function in the e100.c (intel
10/100) driver. With the original driver distributed in kernel 2.6.18
in debian etch, wake on lan did not work. This was tested on 14 dell
optiplexes with built-in ethernet chips
Harry Coin wrote:
At 10:19 AM 1/15/2007 -0800, Auke Kok wrote:
Have you tried the version in 2.6.19?
I even tried copying and pasting the e100_down and the latest PM stuff
from the newest e100.c version on sourceforge. I admit to being
defeated as to how to join a sourceforge group. Too
Allen Parker wrote:
Allen Parker wrote:
I have a PCI-E pro/1000 MT Quad Port adapter, which works quite well
under 2.6.19.2 but fails to see link under 2.6.20-rc5. Earlier today I
reported this to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but thought I should get
the word out in case someone else is testing this
-by: Jesse Brandeburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Jeb Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.c | 90 -
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82540.c | 86
Adam Kropelin wrote:
Allen Parker wrote:
Allen Parker wrote:
From what I've been able to gather, other Intel Pro/1000 chipsets
work fine in 2.6.20-rc5. If the e1000 guys need any assistance
testing, I'll be more than happy to volunteer myself as a guinea pig
for patches.
I wasn't aware that
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Kok, Auke wrote:
Hi,
This patch series contains exclusively fixes for e1000. Some of these
patches were
already sent in december, but didn't make it into any usptream tree
yet. Most
importantly, it addresses two issues in the recently merged msi interrupt
handler and
Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
I get following panic on 2.6.20-rc4-mm1 on a 2-cpu AMD Opteron system.
Same basic config file seems to work with 2.6.20-rc2-mm1 on this same
system. Have not tried -rc3-mm1 yet.
Attached are config file and lspci -vv output. Let me know if you need
more info.
Suka
e1000: update device ID table for register dumps with new devices
From: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The register dump routine of e1000 was missing several newer chipsets. I
reimported the mac detection code from the linux e1000 driver. This fixes
newer NIC's reporting that their bus type is PCI
Auke Kok wrote:
e1000: update device ID table for register dumps with new devices
From: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The register dump routine of e1000 was missing several newer chipsets. I
reimported the mac detection code from the linux e1000 driver. This fixes
newer NIC's reporting
Adam Kropelin wrote:
Auke Kok wrote:
Adam Kropelin wrote:
I am experiencing the no-link issue on a 82572EI single port copper
PCI-E card. I've only tried 2.6.20-rc5, so I cannot tell if this is a
regression or not yet. Will test older kernel soon.
Can provide details/logs if you want 'em
Adam Kropelin wrote:
Auke Kok wrote:
Adam Kropelin wrote:
I haven't been able to test rc5-mm yet because it won't boot on this
box. Applying git-e1000 directly to -rc4 or -rc5 results in a number
of rejects that I'm not sure how to fix. Some are obvious, but the
others I'm unsure
Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Andrei Popa wrote:
It's the 10th resume and in /proc/interrupts eth0 appers 10 times.
The e100_resume() function should be calling netif_device_detach and
free_irq. Could you try the following (compile tested) patch?
I just
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
upstream-linus
Jeff,
is there a reason that you didn't pull the e1000 tree from us? I send you all
the information 5 days ago, WITH the changes that you
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Auke Kok wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
upstream-linus
Jeff,
is there a reason that you didn't pull the e1000 tree from us? I send
you all the information 5 days
Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 01:45:27PM -0800, Auke Kok wrote:
Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Andrei Popa wrote:
It's the 10th resume and in /proc/interrupts eth0 appers 10 times.
The e100_resume() function should be calling
[added netdev to CC]
Roger Heflin wrote:
I have a machine (actually 2 machines) that upon loading
the intel 10GBe driver (ixgb) the machine reboots, I am
using a RHAS4.4 based distribution with Vanilla 2.6.19.2
(the RHAS 4.4.03 kernel also reboots with the ixgb load),
I don't see any messages
-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/e1000/Makefile| 19
drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h | 97
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.c | 1377 +
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_80003es2lan.h | 89
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_82540.c | 670 ++
drivers/net/e1000
e100: fix irq leak on suspend/resume
From: Frederik Deweerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The e100_resume() function should be calling netif_device_detach and
free_irq. This fixes multiple irq's being allocated after resume.
Signed-off-by: Frederik Deweerdt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL
: Allen Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adam Kropelin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Handled-By : Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status : problem is being debugged
I probably can't fix this bug. Not only do I doubt that the e1000 driver is at
fault here, I don't have a system with this particular
Adam Kropelin wrote:
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
None of the MSI code in e1000 has changed significantly either. as
far as I can see, the msi code in e1000 has not changed since
2.6.18. Nonetheless there's no way I can debug any of this without a
system
Adam Kropelin wrote:
Auke Kok wrote:
Adam Kropelin wrote:
I've never had this device work 100% with MSI on any kernel version
I've tested so far. But I'm not the original reporter of the
problem, and I believe for him it was a true regression where a
previous kernel wored correctly.
maybe
David S. Miller wrote:
From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:22:54 +1000
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
05/10: [PATCH] Update truesize with the length of the packet for
packet split
These 10 patches look OK, but since the current kernel
Ingo Oeser wrote:
On Saturday, 22. April 2006 15:49, Jörn Engel wrote:
That was another main point, yes. And the endpoints should be as
little burden on the bottlenecks as possible. One bottleneck is the
receive interrupt, which shouldn't wait for cachelines from other cpus
too much.
Thats
linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Auke Kok wrote:
Ingo Oeser wrote:
On Saturday, 22. April 2006 15:49, Jörn Engel wrote:
That was another main point, yes. And the endpoints should be as
little burden on the bottlenecks as possible. One bottleneck is the
receive interrupt
Shaw wrote:
On 4/21/06, Andy Gospodarek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/21/06, Michael Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 16:01 -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
I just hate to see extra resources used to solve problems that good
coding can solve (not that my suggestion is
Dave Jones wrote:
With 2.6.17-rc3, my E1000 won't get a dhcp lease.
Looking at tcpdump and ifconfig output, it's easy to see why.
It's recieving packets, but the packets transmitted field
of ifconfig never increases.
The last version I have built that worked ok was 2.6.17rc2-git3
*puzzled*
Ben Greear wrote:
I'm running a slightly modified 2.6.16.13 kernel on FC5-amd64. The
motherboard
is SuperMicro H8SSL dual-core AMD system. According to super-micro web
site,
the PCI-X slot is 133Mhz. I'm using a 4-port pro/1000 NIC.
dmesg shows a listing of 120Mhz:
Intel(R) PRO/1000
Francois Romieu wrote:
Jeff Kirsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
@@ -486,8 +495,7 @@ ixgb_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
netif_carrier_off(netdev);
netif_stop_queue(netdev);
- printk(KERN_INFO %s: Intel(R) PRO/10GbE Network Connection\n,
- netdev-name);
+
PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
index fb8cef6..b224e40 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
@@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ static void e1000_restore_vlan(struct e1
static
Ben Greear wrote:
Kernel is 2.6.16.16 with my patches, including a patch to the
e1000.
what patch? I don't see it anywhere.
Cheers,
Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Wed, 31 May 2006 14:31:05 +0530, Amit K Arora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am wondering why this patch e1000: Remove PM warning DPRINTKs
breaking 2.4.x kernels
(http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg10803.html) was
meant only for 2.4 kernels, and _not_ for 2.6
Amit Arora wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 16:30, Auke Kok wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2006 14:31:05 +0530, Amit K Arora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should these DPRINTKs be removed from the 2.6.x e1000 code as well ?
they already are. the patch was merged in 7.0.38-k2 or so which is over a month ago
1 - 100 of 358 matches
Mail list logo
