Brian Haley wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
diff -puN net/sctp/Kconfig~use-menuconfig-objects-sctp net/sctp/Kconfig
--- a/net/sctp/Kconfig~use-menuconfig-objects-sctp
+++ a/net/sctp/Kconfig
@@ -2,11 +2,9 @@
# SCTP configuration
#
-menu SCTP Configuration (EXPERIMENTAL)
-depends
Hi Yoshifuji-san
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
The fix for emerging security threats was overkill and it broke
basic semantic of IPv6 routing header processing. We should assume
RT0 (or even RT2, depends on configuration) as unknown RH type so
that we
- silently ignore the routing header
Neil Horman wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 02:04:33PM +0930, Anton wrote:
Hi all,
Please excuse me if the following question has already been asked on the
mailing list, I am a little new to this.
I am trying to send IPv6 packets from a kernel module. As far as I
understand, I would have
Paolo Galtieri wrote:
Vlad,
what test suite exists for SCTP? The lksctp-tools code hasn't been
updated since Feb of 2006, and I was wondering whether this version is
still the most useful.
Thanks
Hi Paolo
I have a lksctp-tools tree on git.kernel.org that's up to date. We'll need
to
Paolo Galtieri wrote:
Vlad,
I'm looking for something that exercises the SCTP stack. Something
that can be run against different kernel versions for comparing features
and regression testing.
lksctp-tools git repo is a good start. There 2 different sets of test:
1. Frame tests in
and BIC.
are found in the git repository at:
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vxy/lksctp-dev.git
Vlad Yasevich (6):
[SCTP]: Correctly set daddr for IPv6 sockets during peeloff
[SCTP]: Allow unspecified port in sctp_bindx()
[SCTP] Fix leak in sctp_getsockopt_local_addrs
Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
Hallo David, hello Herbert,
indeed i have some concerns about reverting the patch as i do not see
that the MTU is the right thing to distinguish whether a netdevice is
capable to have IPv4/IPv6. E.g. is decnet able to run IPv6?
IMHO the autoconf (in any case) should
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 03:14:57PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
No, the questions should really be:
1. Is IPV6 supported over this media type.
yes: got to 2
no: stop
2. Is the device MTU = IPV6_MIN_MTU
yes: continue
no: stop
Autoconfiguration is a
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS);
@@ -465,6 +440,8 @@ looped_back:
break;
#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6
case IPV6_SRCRT_TYPE_2:
+ if (accept_source_route 0)
+ goto unknown_rh;
Zach Brown wrote:
I'm not sure that I've gotten either the sctp or lockdep details right,
but with this patch I don't get lockdep yelling at me any more :)
--
sctp: lock_sock_nested in sctp_sock_migrate
sctp_sock_migrate() grabs the socket lock on a newly allocated socket while
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Vlad Yasevich wrote:
Hm... This is another case of of two different sockets taking the same
lock...
Arjan, did this every get fixed, or is the nested locking the right
solution
to this?
for this specific case it's ok and the nested solution is right
Hi David
Please pull the following changes:
The following changes since commit 19e6454ca778e11e81497bd87c930dc0defd03d7:
David Howells (1):
[AF_RXRPC]: Return the number of bytes buffered in rxrpc_send_data()
are found in the git repository at:
Currently if the link is brought down via ip link or ifconfig down,
the inet6addr_chain notifiers are not called even though all
the addresses are removed from the interface. This caused SCTP
to add duplicate addresses to it's list.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
net/ipv6
David Miller wrote:
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index f96ed76..6496e03 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -2472,6 +2472,7 @@ static int addrconf_ifdown(struct net_device *dev, int
how)
write_unlock_bh(idev-lock);
for it.
-vlad
--
Currently if the link is brought down via ip link or ifconfig down,
the inet6addr_chain notifiers are not called even though all
the addresses are removed from the interface. This caused SCTP
to add duplicate addresses to it's list.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED
Ok. I'll hold off on this till the full patch is complete.
Thanks
-vlad
Patrick McHardy wrote:
Vlad Yasevich wrote:
I am trying to teach SCTP about the TOS settings on a per-association
basis. While trying to do that, I was using rt_tos2priority call.
Everything worked great while sctp
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 08:39 -0700, David Stevens wrote:
Alexey Kuznetsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/14/2006 03:30:37 AM:
Hello!
No, it returns 1 (allow) if there are no filters to explicitly
filter it. I wrote that code. :-)
I see. It did not behave this way old
Hi Folks
I was looking at SCTP performance problem that is a result of
receive buffer exhaustion and found the we severely overcharge
the receive buffer when multiple data chunks are bundled together.
This bundling usually happens at retransmit time which penalizes us
even more.
Here is what
Ben Woodard wrote:
diff -ru linux-2.6.18/include/net/tcp.h linux-2.6.18.new/include/net/tcp.h
--- linux-2.6.18/include/net/tcp.h2006-09-19 20:42:06.0 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.18.new/include/net/tcp.h
Steve Hill wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
Sorry for the delay in replying.
No. lksctp-developers mailing list is still the best place for SCTP related
discussions. You can subscribe and look in the archives at
Hi Neil
I don't this is still right...
@@ -746,6 +772,7 @@ static void ndisc_recv_ns(struct sk_buff *skb)
int dad = ipv6_addr_any(saddr);
int inc;
int is_router;
+ int type;
if (ipv6_addr_is_multicast(msg-target)) {
ND_PRINTK2(KERN_WARNING
@@
Hi Neil
Neil Horman wrote:
+ /*
+ * This is not a dad solicitation, meaning we
may
+ * need to respond to it, if we are
+ * an optimistic node, go ahead, otherwise
+
chunk to be retransmitted as well.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
net/sctp/outqueue.c | 27 ++-
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/outqueue.c b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
index fba567a..54d1b7f 100644
--- a/net/sctp
BTW, if anyone needs a reproducer, I can provide one.
-vlad
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Neil Horman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 05:54:47PM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
Sec 2.1 of RFC 4429 says
Unless noted otherwise, components of the IPv6 protocol stack should
treat addresses in the Optimistic state equivalently to those in the
Deprecated state, indicating that
Hi Neil
@@ -1027,15 +1029,17 @@ int ipv6_dev_get_saddr(struct net_device *daddr_dev,
}
}
- /* Rule 3: Avoid deprecated address */
+ /* Rule 3: Avoid deprecated and optimistic address */
Hi Neil
I went through the RFC again it seems like the following is missing:
Section 3.3:
* (modifies section 5.4.2) The host MUST join the all-nodes multicast
address and the solicited-node multicast address of the
Tentative address. The host SHOULD NOT delay before sending
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:45:00 -0500), Neil
Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 2a7e461..46f91ee 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -830,7 +830,8
Hi Neil
Neil Horman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 09:13:31AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:45:00 -0500), Neil
Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
New patch attached with most of your suggestions incorporated. I've a few
comments
Neil Horman wrote:
Ok, I'm still testing it, but heres a new patch for review. Significant
changes
include the addition of a CONFIG_IPV6_OPTIMISTIC_DAD option that is dependent
on
the inclusion of both IPPV6 and EXPERIMENTAL options, as well as a new method
for redirecting packets from
Brian Haley wrote:
Hi Neil,
@@ -830,7 +836,8 @@ retry:
ift = !max_addresses ||
ipv6_count_addresses(idev) max_addresses ?
ipv6_add_addr(idev, addr, tmp_plen,
- ipv6_addr_type(addr)IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_MASK,
IFA_F_TEMPORARY) : NULL;
+
Neil Horman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:46:08AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Neil Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 14:06:34 -0500
Ok, I'm still testing it, but heres a new patch for review.
Significant changes include the addition of a
CONFIG_IPV6_OPTIMISTIC_DAD
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 14:04 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Paul P Komkoff Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I have a userspace application, which talks WCCP2 with cisco routers.
It sends and receives UDP packets on port 2048. After I've updated my
server to 2.6.16, it stopped working.
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 11:48 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
IP id is set to 0 on unconnected sockets when the DF bit is set (path
mtu discovery is enabled). Try issuing a connect() in your application
and see if the ids are increasing again.
ID of zero again? I thought that went away years
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 00:21 +0400, Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote:
Replying to Vlad Yasevich:
/* This is only to work around buggy Windows95/2000
* VJ compression implementations. If the ID field
* does not change, they drop every other packet in
* a TCP stream using header
Herbert Xu wrote:
Hi Sridhar:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 05:31:24PM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
I think we currently assume atleast the SCTP header and the data
chunk header to be in the skb head.
But we do handle skbs with data in the frag_list.
Not sure about skb's with paged fragments.
Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 09:36 -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
Herbert Xu wrote:
Hi Sridhar:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 05:31:24PM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
I think we currently assume atleast the SCTP header and the data
chunk header to be in the skb head.
But we do
in it
(digest being embedded in the struct, not a pointer). Make digest a pointer to
fix this warning.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
index c6d93bb..5596f5d 100644
--- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
+++ b/include/net
Nicolas DICHTEL wrote:
Hello,
Suppose that a host has autoconfiguration enabled. It will take RA to
autoconfigure an IPv6 address. For example,
2001:0db8:3008:c1ca:2d0:b7ff:febb:4aee/64.
This host will create a route entry for this onlink prefix (dst:
2001:0db8:3008:c1ca::/64)
in the MAIN
Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Brian Haley wrote:
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
I think for cases across network socket namespaces it should
be a matter for the rules, to decide if the connection should
happen and what error code to return if the connection does not
happen.
There is a potential in this
[For SCTP questions, please use netdev or lksctp-developers list]
Hi Oscar
Isaula Oscar-QOI000 wrote:
I ran into a problem where LKSCTP is reporting a SCTM_COMM_UP indication
to the User application but is giving back a value of zero for the
assoc_id.
Attached are the SCTP debugs for the
Hi Paolo
Paolo Galtieri wrote:
What is happening is that the check for IPV6_ADDR_MAPPED that occurs
during the add is missing when you do the remove and hence the IPv6
address is never mapped to the IPv4 address causing the lookup to
fail. Below is the patch to add the necessary checks to do
Hi Dave
Please consider applying the following two patches. They resolve some
interesting bugs.
Thanks
-vlad
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Sorry, now with the patches that follow...
-vlad
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
fails. This
patch unmaps the addresses on during the remove operation as well.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Galtieri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
net/sctp/socket.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net
and lobby queue in
structure sctp_ulpq.
When there are date in these queue, assertion failed message is printed
in inet_sock_destruct because sk_rmem_alloc of oldsk does not become 0
when socket is destroyed.
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Fujii [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Oscar
Isaula Oscar-QOI000 wrote:
I ran into a problem where LKSCTP is reporting a SCTM_COMM_UP indication
to the User application but is giving back a value of zero for the
assoc_id.
Attached are the SCTP debugs for the period in question.
A couple of things that I would like to note
check the stream-id and flags which it may not
be doing.
2. this clears partial delivery state from the association and results
in app communication hanging.
This patch is a band-aid over a much bigger problem in that we
don't do stream interleave.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED
David Miller wrote:
From: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:38:15 -0400
This is a bug fix, but done on top of 2.6.22 tree. I am trying
to minimize the amount of conflict this would cause during merge
by doing it this way. However, if you would rather keep all
holding the lock is
also problematic as it calls copy_to_user()
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
net/sctp/socket.c | 96 +
1 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index
to multiple different ports
at once. This was reported on the sctp-impl list.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
net/sctp/socket.c |8
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 536298c..6bfae12 100644
Hi All
To support a piece of custom functionality, we needed to add
2 member to the struct inet_sock. During testing, we started
seeing an interesting corruption. Following a hunch, we've
completely ripped out all of our code with the exception of
5 lines that do this:
diff --git
Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
The corruption is triggered after about 10 minutes of running the following
script:
nfspath = $1
localpath = $2
while true; do
mount $nfspath $localpath
sleep 5
cp /boot/vmlinuz $localpath
sleep 5
rm $localpath/vmlinuz
sleep 5
Olaf Kirch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 23:03, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
It looks like someone is stepping all over the inet_sock.
We'll continue looking, but if anyone has any ideas of what might
be going on, I'd appreciate it.
This could be a socket in TIME_WAIT. A socket entering
David Miller wrote:
From: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:43:35 -0400
[PATCH] [SCTP] Fix sctp_getsockopt_local_addrs_old() to use local storage
sctp_getsockopt_local_addrs_old() in net/sctp/socket.c calls copy_to_user()
while the spinlock addr_lock is held
Of Vlad Yasevich
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:45 AM
To: Isaula Oscar-QOI000
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SCTP] Initialization collision problem
Hi Oscar
Isaula Oscar-QOI000 wrote:
I ran into a problem where LKSCTP is reporting a SCTM_COMM_UP
indication
Topher Fischer wrote:
Does the kernel have any protection against ARP spoofing? If not, does
anybody know why not? (As in, nobody has done anything, or because of A,
B, and C).
Thanks,
If by arp spoofing you mean receiving arp replies from multiple sources and
trusting all of them, then
Chris Friesen wrote:
Vlad Yasevich wrote:
If by arp spoofing you mean receiving arp replies from multiple
sources and
trusting all of them, then I haven't seen anything.
I don't know the history as to why nothing has has been done.
This concept is a valuable tool to allow for fast
Hi David
This is a set of recent bufixes to SCTP. Please apply.
Thanks
-vlad
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Sridhar Samudrala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/net/sctp/sctp.h |4 ++
net/sctp/ipv6.c | 49
net/sctp/protocol.c | 79
We need to make sure that all destination ports are the same, since
the association really must not connect to multiple different ports
at once. This was reported on the sctp-impl list.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
net/sctp/socket.c |8
1 files changed, 8
[ sory for possible duplicates, mail server problems ]
Hi David
This a set of 4 bug fixes for SCTP. Please apply.
Thanks
-vlad
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
During the INIT/COOKIE-ACK collision cases, it's possible to get
into a situation where the association id is not yet set at the time
of the user event generation. As a result, user events have an
association id set to 0 which will confuse applications.
This happens if we hit case B of duplicate
Update the SO_REUSEADDR handling to also check for listen state. This
was muliple listening server sockets can't be created and they will
not steal packets from each other.
Reported by Paolo Galtieri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
net/sctp/socket.c | 32
end up trying to update the
association that was created on A as a result of the (lost) INIT,
but that association doesn't have the ID set yet.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/net/sctp/command.h |2 ++
include/net/sctp/structs.h |1 +
net/sctp/associola.c
The socket API draft is unclear about whether to include the
chunk header or not. Recent discussion on the sctp implementors
mailing list clarified that the chunk header shouldn't be included,
but the error parameter header still needs to be there.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED
I broke the non-wildcard case recently. This is to fixes it.
Now, explictitly bound addresses can ge retrieved using the API.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
net/sctp/socket.c | 12
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp
Hi David
This is yet more bugfixes for SCTP:
[SCTP] Prevent OOPS if hmac modules didn't load
[SCTP] Correctly copy addresses in sctp_copy_laddrs
[SCTP] Do not include ABORT chunk header in the notification.
Please apply.
Thanks
-vlad
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
SCTP was checking for NULL when trying to detect hmac
allocation failure where it should have been using IS_ERR.
Also, print a rate limited warning to the log telling the
user what happend.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
net/sctp/socket.c |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6
Rick Jones wrote:
It is the reverse - GSO will segment one super-packet just before calling
the driver so that the stack is traversed only once. In my case, I am
trying to send out multiple skbs, possibly small packets, in one shot.
GSO will not help for small packets.
If there are small
Rick Jones wrote:
Vlad Yasevich wrote:
Rick Jones wrote:
It is the reverse - GSO will segment one super-packet just before
calling
the driver so that the stack is traversed only once. In my case, I am
trying to send out multiple skbs, possibly small packets, in one shot.
GSO will not help
Ian McDonald wrote:
On 5/11/07, Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May be for TCP? What about other protocols?
There are other protocols?-) True, UDP, and I suppose certain modes of
SCTP might be sending streams of small packets, as might TCP with
TCP_NODELAY set.
Do
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 17:40 -0600, Mark Butler wrote:
Rick Jones wrote:
Again from RFC 791:
snip
Every internet destination must be able to receive a datagram of 576
octets either in one piece or in fragments to be reassembled.
Hence the minimum IPv4 MTU of 68 bytes.
Hi All
I am trying to understand if it is a good idea to have cloned skbs
reside on a frag_list?
I've ran into a situation with SCTP, where it is possible to create
infinite recursion loops by having cloned skbs reside on a frag_list.
We end up in a situation where have two clones skb1 and skb2
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 10:38 -0600, Mark Butler wrote:
Vlad Yasevich wrote:
Hi All
I am trying to understand if it is a good idea to have cloned skbs
reside on a frag_list?
I've ran into a situation with SCTP, where it is possible to create
infinite recursion loops by having cloned skbs
Steve Hill wrote:
Vlad Yasevich wrote on 25 January 2007 16:33:
Can you try the attached patch and let me know if the problem is
fixed. You can try reducing rto_max or path_max_retrans to get the
failover to happen a little faster.
Sorry for the delay - I've been on vacation for the past
Hi Steve
Steve Hill wrote:
Vlad Yasevich wrote on 05 February 2007 16:39:
Once you start simulating the network failure, how long do you wait?
If you have not changed rto_max and path_max_retrans, you can end up
waiting quite a while for the full path switchover. This will also
severely
not 100% sure. In my
case, the sender if running 2.6.10-rc7 and receiver is running
Ubuntu 2.6.17-10.
I'll try running against a different receiver as well.
-vlad
Steve Hill wrote:
Vlad Yasevich wrote on 05 February 2007 17:08:
1. What did you set the sinfo_timetolive to?
I presume you
Steve Hill wrote:
Vlad Yasevich wrote on 05 February 2007 20:35:
would you mind terribly, changing the -d $net to the
-i $net, and run the script with the interface name instead?
I seem to get the same failure when dropping traffic based on interface
as I do when dropping based on address
Hi Neil
a few comments. sorry, just can't resist... :)
@@ -2627,6 +2673,9 @@ static void addrconf_dad_completed(struct inet6_ifaddr
*ifp)
* Configure the address for reception. Now it is valid.
*/
+ if (ifp-flags IFA_F_OPTIMISTIC)
+
:00 2001
From: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:58:25 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [SCTP] Strike the transport before updating rto
Once we reach a poing where we exceed the max.path.retrans
strike the trasport before updating the rto. This will force
transport switch at the right
Darn... and it was looking so good...
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
index 7b7bd44..8a1ea96 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
@@ -859,6 +859,34 @@ static int ip6_dst_lookup_tail(struct sock *sk,
err =
Steve Hill wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
I think I've tracked this down. Can you apply the attached patch on top
of the one I posted before and re-run your test.
Using the 2.6.20 kernel on the sending side with both patches applied, the
problem seems to be fixed
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:29:04 +0200
Hasso Tepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is long standing issue in kernel which makes using /etc/sysctl.conf
useless for boottime configuration of specific interface properties and
breaks probably any software relying on
Neil Horman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 03:29:04PM +0200, Hasso Tepper wrote:
There is long standing issue in kernel which makes using /etc/sysctl.conf
useless for boottime configuration of specific interface properties and
breaks probably any software relying on unconditional existence of
Hi Yoshifuji-san
I have a question:
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
commit bd292ad1ccbf15c72351f79d4a130dd50da81613
Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu Feb 15 02:07:27 2007 +0900
[IPV6] ADDRCONF: Register inet6_dev earlier.
Allocate inet6_dev earlier to allow
David Miller wrote:
From: weidong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:30:57 -0500
when I use linux TCP socket, and find there is a bug in function
sk_acceptq_is_full().
...
Consider an example:
After listen(sockfd, 1) system call, sk-sk_max_ack_backlog is set to
1. As we
David Miller wrote:
From: Rick Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:54:00 -0800
So we're not disallowing a backlog argument of zero to
listen(). We'll accept that just fine, the only thing that
happens is that you'll get what you ask for, that being
no connections :-)
I'm
Reset ssthresh to the correct value (peer's a_rwnd) when restarting
association.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
net/sctp/transport.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/transport.c b/net/sctp/transport.c
index c4699f5..4d8c2ab
This patch series implements additional SCTP socket options. This
was originally submitted too late for 2.6.21, so I am re-submitting
for 2.6.22.
Please consider applying.
Thanks
-vlad
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
This option induces partial delivery to run as soon
as the specified amount of data has been accumulated on
the association. However, we give preference to fully
reassembled messages over PD messages. In any case,
window and buffer is freed up.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED
ABORT chunks into the sac_info field and pass that
to the user.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/net/sctp/ulpevent.h |1 +
include/net/sctp/user.h |1 +
net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c| 11 +++--
net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 14 ++--
net/sctp
Parameters only take effect when a corresponding flag bit is set
and a value is specified. This means we need to check the flags
in addition to checking for non-zero value.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/net/sctp/user.h | 15 +++--
net/sctp/socket.c
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/net/sctp/user.h |1 +
net/sctp/associola.c| 10 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sctp/user.h b/include/net/sctp/user.h
index 9a83527..4ed7521 100644
--- a/include/net/sctp
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/net/sctp/constants.h |2 +-
include/net/sctp/structs.h |1 +
include/net/sctp/user.h |2 +
net/sctp/associola.c |2 +-
net/sctp/protocol.c |2 +-
net/sctp/socket.c| 61
Jørgensen.
Additionally, this functionality now permits multiple associations
on the same endpoint to enter Partial Delivery. Applications should
be extra careful, when using this functionality, to track EOR indicators.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/net/sctp/structs.h
On Tue August 22 2006 03:22, David Miller wrote:
From: Sridhar Samudrala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:22:37 -0700
[SCTP]: Remove multiple levels of msecs to jiffies conversions.
The SCTP sysctl entries are displayed in milliseconds, but stored
internally in jiffies. This
David Miller wrote:
From: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:16:29 -0400
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / wrote:
IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS);
@@ -465,6 +440,8 @@ looped_back:
break;
#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6
Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 15:29:16 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Tue, 10 Jul 2007
21:11:17 +0300), Remi Denis-Courmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
ICMPv6 Router Advertisements may now contain informations that is
mostly of interest to
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
Hello.
This patch is just a tentative implementation of RFC3542 IPV6_PKTINFO
sticky option, and is NOT intended to be applied so far.
We need to check if this is okay in RFC POV, anyway.
ok. comments from just the RFC pov.
diff --git
1 - 100 of 366 matches
Mail list logo
