Francois Romieu wrote:
Chris Lalancette [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
Similar to this commit:
http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=d15e9c4d9a75702b30e00cdf95c71c88e3f3f51e
It's not safe in cp_start_xmit to blindly call spin_lock_irq and then
Chris Lalancette [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
Thanks for the comments. While the patch you sent will help, there are
still other places that will have problems. For example, in netpoll_send_skb,
we call local_irq_save(flags), then call dev-hard_start_xmit(), and then call
(trying again, this time to the correct maintainer)
All,
Similar to this commit:
http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=d15e9c4d9a75702b30e00cdf95c71c88e3f3f51e
It's not safe in cp_start_xmit to blindly call spin_lock_irq and then
spin_unlock_irq,
Chris Lalancette [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
Similar to this commit:
http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=d15e9c4d9a75702b30e00cdf95c71c88e3f3f51e
It's not safe in cp_start_xmit to blindly call spin_lock_irq and then
spin_unlock_irq, since it
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 08:56:35PM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote:
As I understand http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/12/239, something like the
patch below should had been sent instead. Herbert, ack/nak ?
Sorry, what I said in that thread is in error. Netpoll may
unfortunately call the transmit
All,
Similar to this commit:
http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=d15e9c4d9a75702b30e00cdf95c71c88e3f3f51e
It's not safe in cp_start_xmit to blindly call spin_lock_irq and then
spin_unlock_irq, since it may very well be the case that cp_start_xmit
