Well.. before you can finish this work we need to decide upon what the
interface to userspace will be.
- The miscdev isn't appropriate
Why isn't miscdev appropriate?
We just shouldn't use miscdev for networking conventionally?
Yes it's rather odd, especially for networking.
What does the
From: Keiichi KII [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:02:04 +0900
Stephen Hemminger said The configuration of netconsole's looks like the
configuration of routes.
I think so too.
So I think ioctl commands for adding/removing port and the following userland
application like route(8)
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:51:13 +0900
Keiichi KII [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started to do some cleanups and fixups here, but abandoned it when it was
all getting a bit large.
Here are some fixes against this patch:
I'm going to fix my patches by following your reviews and send new patches
on
We don't really have anything that corresponds to netpoll's
connections at higher levels.
I'm tempted to say we should make this work more like the dummy
network device. ie:
modprobe netconsole -o netcon1 [params]
modprobe netconsole -o netcon2 [params]
The configuration of netconsole's looks
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:14:28 +0900 Keiichi KII [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:51:13 +0900
Keiichi KII [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started to do some cleanups and fixups here, but abandoned it when it
was
all getting a bit large.
Here are some fixes against this
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:29:02 -0700
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:14:28 +0900 Keiichi KII [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:51:13 +0900
Keiichi KII [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started to do some cleanups and fixups here, but abandoned it
I started to do some cleanups and fixups here, but abandoned it when it was
all getting a bit large.
Here are some fixes against this patch:
I'm going to fix my patches by following your reviews and send new patches
on the LKML and the netdev ML in a few days.
Thank you for your comments
Please include an update to Documentation/networking/netconsole.txt
OK, I update the documnet for the added functions in next patches.
Thank you for your comments.
--
Keiichi KII
NEC Corporation OSS Promotion Center
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:51:13 +0900
Keiichi KII [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started to do some cleanups and fixups here, but abandoned it when it was
all getting a bit large.
Here are some fixes against this patch:
I'm going to fix my patches by following your reviews and send new
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:15:26AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:51:13 +0900
Keiichi KII [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started to do some cleanups and fixups here, but abandoned it when it
was
all getting a bit large.
Here are some fixes against this patch:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:21:10 -0500
Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:15:26AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:51:13 +0900
Keiichi KII [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started to do some cleanups and fixups here, but abandoned it when it
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:06:41 +0900 Keiichi KII [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Keiichi KII [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch contains the following changes for supporting multiple logging
agents.
1. extend netconsole to multiple netpolls
To send kernel messages to multiple logging agents,
From: Keiichi KII [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch contains the following changes for supporting multiple logging
agents.
1. extend netconsole to multiple netpolls
To send kernel messages to multiple logging agents, extend netcosnole
to be able to use multiple netpolls. Each netpoll sends
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:06:41 +0900
Keiichi KII [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Keiichi KII [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch contains the following changes for supporting multiple logging
agents.
1. extend netconsole to multiple netpolls
To send kernel messages to multiple logging agents,
14 matches
Mail list logo
