Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Joseph Jezak wrote:
Can you provide the details to the list? I'll look into getting
SoftMAC fixed if you do.
sure
the basic issue is that bcm43xx does it's rx processing in a softirq,
and holds the bcm-irq_lock during that time. The rx processing calls
into the
On Saturday 08 July 2006 19:59, you wrote:
kernel: stack backtrace:
kernel: [c0103d1d] show_trace_log_lvl+0x13d/0x160
kernel: [c010525b] show_trace+0x1b/0x20
kernel: [c0105286] dump_stack+0x26/0x30
kernel: [c0133f7d] check_usage+0x26d/0x280
kernel: [c013536f] __lock_acquire+0x77f/0xdd0
Joseph Jezak wrote:
Can you provide the details to the list? I'll look into getting
SoftMAC fixed if you do.
sure
the basic issue is that bcm43xx does it's rx processing in a softirq, and
holds the bcm-irq_lock during that time. The rx processing calls into the
softmac layer, which in turn
