On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:26:46AM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 3:43 am, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
... But if you consider this code will probably become classical
and will be read, quoted and teached next 1000 years, then the style
could matter...
This from the guy
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 5:01 am, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:26:46AM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 3:43 am, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
... But if you consider this code will probably become classical
and will be read, quoted and teached next
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 08:13:57AM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 5:01 am, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:26:46AM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 3:43 am, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
... But if you consider this code will probably
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:47:29AM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
...
I guess it all depends on who is reading it ;)
Sure! I only had a feeling your way is maybe slightly
less often used so I wanted some opinion.
Personally, I don't care too
much either way as long as it is fixed.
Yes, you've
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 3:43 am, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
... But if you consider this code will probably become classical
and will be read, quoted and teached next 1000 years, then the style
could matter...
This from the guy who believes Justin Timberlake rocks! ;)
All right, you convinced
On 1/9/07, Paul Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 3:43 am, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
... But if you consider this code will probably become classical
and will be read, quoted and teached next 1000 years, then the style
could matter...
This from the guy who believes
On 04-01-2007 21:04, Paul Moore wrote:
...
+++ net-2.6.20_bugfix_2/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ lookup_protocol:
sk-sk_reuse = 1;
inet = inet_sk(sk);
- inet-is_icsk = INET_PROTOSW_ICSK answer_flags;
+ inet-is_icsk = (INET_PROTOSW_ICSK answer_flags)
On Monday, January 8 2007 8:25 am, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 04-01-2007 21:04, Paul Moore wrote:
+++ net-2.6.20_bugfix_2/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ lookup_protocol:
sk-sk_reuse = 1;
inet = inet_sk(sk);
- inet-is_icsk = INET_PROTOSW_ICSK answer_flags;
+
From: Paul Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:04:31 -0500
From: Paul Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The inet_create() and inet6_create() functions incorrectly set the
inet_sock-is_icsk field. Both functions assume that the is_icsk field is
large enough to hold at least a
On 1/4/07, David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Paul Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:04:31 -0500
From: Paul Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The inet_create() and inet6_create() functions incorrectly set the
inet_sock-is_icsk field. Both functions assume that the is_icsk
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 00:32:31 -0200
I expected a warning since the and operation clearly could yield a
value that would overflow, just like in the constant case...
It sounds stupid, but once you introduce variables and not
everything is
11 matches
Mail list logo
