Hi Tobias, On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Tobias Klauser <tklau...@distanz.ch> wrote: > On 2016-12-13 at 02:36:00 +0100, Vadim Kochan <vadi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Add proc_find_by_inode(...) to find pid & it's command line by inode. >> The main motivation for this is to have process specific function located >> in proc.c and only call it from flowtop.c. >> >> proc_find_by_inode(...) its just a refactored version of walk_processes(...) >> from the flowtop.c. >> >> Vadim Kochan (2): >> proc: Add function for find process by inode >> flowtop: Replace walk_processes(...) by proc_find_by_inode(...) > > IMO, these could be combined into one patch as this makes it easier to > immediately verify that the logic of the function wasn't changed. > Splitting it up into two patches makes this verification unnecessarily > cumbersome. > > Further comments will follows as replies to the individual patches.
Thanks for the review, I will fix comments and squash patches into one. It is still not easy to learn zen of patch splitting:) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "netsniff-ng" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to netsniff-ng+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
