On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 05:44 pm, Geert Lovink wrote:
(posted to nettime with the permission of the authors. this proposal tries
to get rid of lawyers altogether, including lessig. the bad thing about
creative commons: it's still a legal document and thus feeds the
evergrowing hegemony of the
The main problem here is the assumption that copyright has much to do with
author, performer or artist. It is nominally attached to one, but its purpose
is to enable cashing in on the work, and there is a large number of people and
entities involved in that cashing in. The initial author gets just
A few days ago Jon Ippolito posted a sort of manifesto positing
Internet2 as a threat to the kind of internet artists and academics
would like to continue to use.
I know Jon a bit from my MARCEL involvement and elsewhere. Jon's a
really smart guy with a keen gift for deft rhetoric, and I am
Re: Schijndel Smiers: IMAGINING A WORLD WITHOUT COPYRIGHT
Benjamin Geer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
salucofagos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005
